Utilization rates of lower extremity prostheses in Germany and Switzerland : A comparison of the years 2005-2008;Verwendungsraten von Prothesen der unteren Extremität in Deutschland und der Schweiz : Ein Vergleich der Jahre 2005-2008

Orthopade

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 793-801

  Falbrede, I ^a   Widmer, M ^b   Kurtz, S ^c   Schneidmuller D ^d   Dudda, M ^e   Roder C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b OBSAN Schweizerisches Gesundheitsobservatorium   (Switzerland)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^e RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ankle prosthesis; Hip prosthesis; Knee prosthesis; Revision burden; Utilization rate

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GERMANY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; STATISTICS; SWITZERLAND; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, ANKLE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SWITZERLAND; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 80054930644     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1787-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sculco T, Martucci E (eds) (2002) Total knee arthroplasty, chapter 16. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
2. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME et al(2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A:171-177
3. Crowninshield RD, Rosenberg AG, Sporer SM (2006) Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:266-272
4. Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ et al (2010) Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92:130-135
5. Foran JR, Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD et al (2004) Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: a comparison with a matched control group. J Arthroplasty 19:817-824
6. Katz JN, Mahomed NN, Baron JA et al (2007) Association of hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient-centered outcomes of total knee replacement in a population-based cohort of patients age 65 years and older. Arthritis Rheum 56:568-574
7. Kelly MP, Bozic KJ (2009) Cost drivers in total hip arthroplasty: effects of procedure volume and implant selling price. Am J Orthop 38:E1-E4
8. Khatod M, Inacio M, Paxton EW et al (2008) Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004. Acta Orthop 79:812-819
9. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:1487-1497
10. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89:780-785
11. Kurtz S, Röder C, Lau E et al (2010) International survey of primary and revision total hip replacement. 56th annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society. New Orleans, USA
12. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J et al (2007) Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89(Suppl3):144-151
13. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN et al (2003) Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85-A:27-32
14. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T et al (2002) The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84-A(Suppl 2):2-20
15. Manley M, Ong K, Lau E et al (2008) Effect of volume on total hip arthroplasty revision rates in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:2446-2451
16. Münger P, Röder C, Ackermann-Liebrich U et al (2006) Patient-related riskfactors leading to aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study of 5,035 patients. Acta Orthop 77:567-574
17. Röder C, Bach B, Berry DJ et al (2010) Obesity, age, sex, diagnosis, and fixation mode differently affect early cup failure in total hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 4420 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1954-1963
18. Schräder P, Grouven U, Bender R (2007) Is it possible to calculate minimum provider volumes for total knee replacement using routine data? Results of a threshold value analysis of German quality assurance data for inpatient treatment. Orthopade 36:570-576
19. Schräder P, Rath T (2007) Volume-outcome-relationship in total hip replacement-literature review and model calculation of the health care situation. ZOrthop Unfall 145:281-290
20. Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN (2007) Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:35-41
21. Young NL, Cheah D,Waddell JP et al (1998) Patient characteristics that affect the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: a review. Can J Surg 41:188-195