Micropatterning strategies to engineer controlled cell and tissue architecture in vitro

BioTechniques

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 13-23

  D'Arcangelo, Elisa ^a   McGuigan, Alison P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Co culture; In vitro culture platforms; Micropatterning; Soft lithography; Tissue architecture; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

DIMETICONE; MACROGOL; SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOPRINTING; CELL ADHESION; CELL POPULATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOARCHITECTURE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MICROCONTACT PRINTING; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; MICROPATTERNING TECHNIQUE; POLARIZATION; PROCEDURES CONCERNING CELLS; ROBOTICS; SOFT LITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELL; ADHESION; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; DEVICES; PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADHESIVENESS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84921780965     PISSN: 07366205     EISSN: 19409818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2144/000114245     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
2. Armitage, S., & Marston, C. (2008). Corporate disclosure, cost of capital and reputation: Evidence from finance directors. The British Accounting Review, 40(4), 314-336.
3. Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K., & Warfield, T. (1999). Corporate reporting on the internet. Accounting Horizons, 13(3), 241-257.
4. Belkaoui, A., & AlNajjar, F. (2006). Earnings opacity internationally and elements of social, economic and accounting order. Review of Accounting and Finance, 3(3), 130-144.
5. Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2009). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296-343.
6. Bonson, E., Cortijo, V., & Escobar, T. (2009). A Delphi investigation to explain the voluntary adoption of XBRL. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 9(15), 193-205.
7. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (2001). Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information System Research, 12(3), 304-321.
8. Compliance week. (2008). Views on XBRL adoption. Boston, USA: Wilmington Group Plc. Accessed from http://www. complianceweek. com/article/4415/vews-on-xbrl-adoption.
9. Cordery, C. J., Fowler, C. J., & Mustafa, K. (2011). A solution looking for a problem: Factors associated with the non-adoption of XBRL. Pacific Accounting Review, 23(1), 69-88.
10. Crook, C. W., & Kumar, R. L. (1998). Electronic data interchange: A multi-industry investigation using grounded theory. Information & Management, 34(2), 75-89.
11. Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37.
12. Debreceny, R., Farewell, S., Piechocki, M., Falden, C., & Graning, A. (2010). Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(3), 296-306.
13. Debreceny, R., & Gray, G. L. (1999). Financial reporting on the internet and the external audit. European Accounting Review, 8(2), 335-350.
14. Delmas, M. A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 91-119.
15. DePietro, R., Wiarda, E., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology, and environment. In L. G. Tornatzky & M. Fleischer (Eds.), The Processes of Technological Innovation (pp. 151-75). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433.
17. DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Dong, Y., Xu, K., & Dresner, M. (2007). Environmental determinants of VMI adoption: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Research, 43(4), 355-369.
19. Doolin, B., & Troshani, I. (2007). Organizational adoption of XBRL. Electronic Markets, 17(3), 199-209.
20. Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., & Mousa, R. (2009). XBRL: Views of stakeholders. ACCA Research Report No. 111. Retrieved from http://www, accaglobal. com (accessed on 25 October 2011).
21. Elsayed, M. O., & Hoque, Z. (2010). Perceived environmental factors and corporate voluntary disclosure practices: An empirical study. The British Accounting Review, 42(1), 17-35.
22. Elliot, S. (2002). Research model and theoretical implications. In S. Elliot (Ed.), Electronic Commerce B2C Strategies and Models (pp. 291-326). Brisbane: Wiley.
23. Ellis, J., & Belle, J. V. (2009). Open source software adoption by South African MSEs: Barriers and enablers. Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers' Association (pp. 41-49). Eastern Cape, South Africa. New York: ACM, 29 June-1 July.
24. Erickson, B. H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99-121). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2000). Electronic distribution of business reporting information. Steering Committee Report Series. Business Reporting Research Project. http://www. fasb. org.
26. Fosso, S., Keating, T., & Michael, C. K. (2009). RFID adoption issues: Analysis of organizational benefits and risks. Retrieved from http://www. autoidlabs. org/single-view/dir/article/1/326/page. html. (accessed on 31 March 2011).
27. Frambach, R. T. (1993). An integrated model of organizational adoption and diffusion of innovations. European Journal of Marketing, 27(5), 22-41.
28. Gharavi, H., Love, P. E. D., & Cheng, W. W. L. (2004). Information and communication technology in the stockbroking industry: An evolutionary approach to the diffusion of innovation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(9), 756-765.
29. Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 938-951.
30. Grover, V. (1993). An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603-640.
31. Haniffa, R., & Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317-349.
32. Henderson, D., Sheetz, S. D., & Trinkle, B. S. (2012). The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 109-140.
33. Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. D., & Mumford, K. D. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality and over determination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202-226.
34. Hovav, A., & Kim, Y. J. (2006). Determinants of IP Version 6 adoption. Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology (ICCGI'06), Bucharest, Romania, 1-3 August 2006.
35. Huang, Z., Janz, B. D., & Frolick, M. N. (2008). A comprehensive examination of internet-EDI adoption. Information Systems Management, 25(3), 273-286.
36. Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 465-485.
37. Jeyaraj, A., Joseph, R. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.
38. Johnston, K. A., & Seymour, L. (2005). Why South Africans don't FLOSS? Proceedings IBIMA, 2005 International Conference on Information Management in Modern Enterprise: Issues & Solutions (pp. 438-436). Lisbon: IBIMA Publishing, 5-7 July.
39. Jones, A., & Willis, M. (2003). The challenge for XBRL: Business reporting for the investor. Balance Sheet, 11(3), 29-37.
40. Khanna, T., Palepu, K., & Srinivasan, S. (2004). Disclosure practices of foreign companies interacting with US markets. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 475-508.
41. Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small business using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information and Management, 38(8), 507-521.
42. Li, Y., Roge' J. N., Rydl, L., & Crews, M. (2006). Information technology addressing transparency: The potential effects of XBRL on financial disclosure. Issues in Information System, 7(2), 241-245.
43. Lin, C. Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of technological innovations by logistics service providers in China. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 19-38.
44. Lippert, S. K., & Govindarajulu, C. (2006). Technological, organizational, and environmental antecedents to web services adoption. Communications of the IIMA, 6(1), 146-158.
45. Locke, J., & Lowe, A. (2007). XBRL: An (open) source of enlightenment or disillusion? European Accounting Review, 16(3), 585-623.
46. Lopes, P. T., & Rodrigues, L. I. (2007). Accounting for financial instruments: An analysis of the determinants of disclosure in the Portuguese stock exchange. The International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 25-56.
47. Lybaert, N. (2002). On-line financial reporting: An analysis of the Dutch listed firms. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 2(4), 195-234.
48. Lymer, A., Debreceny, R., Gray, G. L., & Rahman, A. (1999). Business Reporting on the Internet. A report prepared for the International Accounting Standards Committee. London: International Accounting Standards Committee.
49. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
50. Madden, P. (2009). Standard Business Reporting: An Idea Whose Time Starts Now. Retrieved 25 February 2011 from http://www. treasury. gov. au/documents/1633/PDF/1_SBR. pdf.
51. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods and Research, 22(1), 127-151.
52. Nilakanta, S., & Scameel, R. W. (1990). The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment. Management Science, 36(4), 24-40.
53. Oyelere, P., Lasward, F., & Fisher, R. (2003). Determinants of internet financial reporting by New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 14(1), 26-63.
54. Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160.
55. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S. (1994). Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 157-186.
56. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
57. Russel, J., & Brown, I. (2007). Radio frequency identification technology: An exploratory study on adoption in the South African retail sector. International Journal of Information Management, 27(4), 250-265.
58. Schweikart, J. A. (1985). Contingency theory as a framework for research in international accounting. The International Journal of Accounting, 21(1), 89-98.
59. Silveira, C., Abreu, R., & Fatima, D. (2007). From an object-oriented approach to the financial reporting: An open architecture. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 7(13-14), 1-25.
60. Songpol, K., Burner, G. C., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2009). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of business Research, 62(7), 706-712.
61. Sutton, S. G. (2010). The fundamental role of technology in accounting: Researching reality. Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research, 13, 1-11.
62. Tan, S., & Tower, G. (1999). The influence of selected contingent variables on half yearly reproting compliance by listed companies in Australia and Singapore. Asian Review of Accounting, 7(2), 66-83.
63. Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (1995). Innovation diffusion theory as a predictor of adoption intention for financial EDI. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 155-165). Amsterdam, Netherlands, 10-13 December 1995. Amsterdam: The Association for Information Systems.
64. Thomas, A. P. (1986). The contingency of corporate reporting: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(3), 253-270.
65. Troshani, I., & Doolin, B. (2005). Drivers and inhibitors impacting technology adoption: A qualitative investigation into the Australian experience with XBRL. 16th Bled eConference, eIntegration in Action. Bled, Slovenia, 6-8 June 2005.
66. Wang, Y. M., Wang, Y. S., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting & Change, 77(5), 803-815.
67. Webster, J., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1544-1573.
68. Xu, S., Zhu, K., & Gibbs, J. (2004). Global technology, local adoption: A cross-country investigation of internet adoption by companies in the United States and China. Electronic Markets, 14(1), 13-24.
69. Yoon, H., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2011). Does XBRL adoption reduces information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 157-163.
70. Zhang, C., Cui, L., Huang, L., & Zhang, C. (2007). Organizational dynamics of technology-based innovation: Diversifying the research agenda. In T. McMaster, D. Wastell, E. Femeley & J. DeGross (Eds.), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (pp. 393-408). Boston, USA: Springer.
71. Zhu, K. & Weyant, J. P. (2003). Strategic decisions of new technology adoption under asymmetric information: A game-theoretic model. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 643-675.