The development of gaze behaviors in response to biological motion displays

Infant Behavior and Development

Volumn 38, Issue , 2015, Pages 97-106

  Furuhata, Naoki ^a   Shirai, Nobu ^b  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

12 month old infants; 9 month old infants; Attention direction; Biological motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BIOLOGICAL MOTION; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GAZE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LIGHT EXPOSURE; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; VISUAL STIMULATION; WALKING; AWARENESS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN RELATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGY, CHILD;

EID: 84921760124     PISSN: 01636383     EISSN: 19348800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allison T., Puce A., McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:267-278.
2. Bertenthal B.I., Proffitt D.R., Cutting J.E. Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1984, 37:213-230.
3. Bertenthal B.I., Proffitt D.R., Spetner N.B., Thomas M.A. The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. Child Development 1985, 56:531-543.
4. Blake R., Turner L.M., Smoski M.J., Pozdol S.L., Stone W.L. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological Science 2003, 14:151-157.
5. Corkum V., Moore C. Development of joint visual attention in infants. Joint attention: Its origins and role in development 1995, 61-83. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. C. Moore, P. Dunham (Eds.).
6. Cutting J.E., Kozlowski L.T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1977, 9:353-356.
7. D'Entremont B. A perceptual-attentional explanation of gaze following in 3- and 6-month-olds. Developmental Science 2000, 3:302-311.
8. Dittrich W.H., Troscianko T., Lea S.E., Morgan D. Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 1996, 25:727-738.
9. Fox R., McDaniel C. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 1982, 218:486-487.
10. Freire A., Lewis T.L., Maurer D., Blake R. The development of sensitivity to biological motion in noise. Perception 2006, 35:647-657.
11. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research 2001, 41:1475-1482.
12. Grossman E.D., Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 2002, 35:1167-1175.
13. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:711-720.
14. Hirai M., Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 22:301-304.
15. Hirai M., Watanabe S., Honda Y., Kakigi R. Developmental changes in point-light walker processing during childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience 2009, 161:311-325.
16. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:201-211.
17. Klin A., Lin D.J., Gorrindo P., Ramsay G., Jones W. Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature 2009, 459:257-261.
18. Kozlowski L., Cutting J. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 1977, 21:575-580.
19. Kuhlmeier V.A., Troje N.F., Lee V. Young infants detect the direction of biological motion in point-light displays. Infancy 2010, 15:83-93.
20. Mather G., Murdoch L. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1994, 258:273-279.
21. Pavlova M., Krägeloh-Mann I., Sokolov A., Birbaumer N. Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception 2001, 30:925-933.
22. Pavlova M., Sokolov A. Orientation specificity in biological motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:889-899.
23. Pollick F.E., Paterson H.M., Bruderlin A., Sanford A.J. Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 2001, 82:B51-B61.
24. Shi J., Weng X., He S., Jiang Y. Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting. Cognition 2010, 117:348-354.
25. Simion F., Regolin L., Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:809-813.
26. Sumi S. Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception 1984, 13:283-286.
27. Swettenham J., Remington A., Laing K., Fletcher R., Coleman M., Gomez J.C. Perception of pointing from biological motion point-light displays in typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2013, 43:1437-1446.
28. Tomasello M. Joint attention as social cognition. Joint attention: Its origin and role in development 1995, 103-130. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Moore, P.J. Dunham (Eds.).
29. Troje N.F., Westhoff C., Lavrov M. Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:667-675.
30. Yoon J.M.D., Johnson S.C. Biological motion displays elicit social behavior in 12-month-olds. Child Development 2009, 80:1069-1075.