Developmental changes in point-light walker processing during childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study

Neuroscience

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 311-325

  Hirai, M ^a,b   Watanabe, S ^a   Honda, Y ^a   Kakigi, R ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

biological motion; cross sectional study; developmental change; ERP; event related potential; point light walker

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WALKING;

EID: 67349195013     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.026     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allison T., Puce A., and McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4 (2000) 267-278
2. Allison T., Puce A., Spencer D.D., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb Cortex 9 (1999) 415-430
3. Arroyo S., Lesser R.P., Poon W.T., Webber W.R., and Gordon B. Neuronal generators of visual evoked potentials in humans: visual processing in the human cortex. Epilepsia 38 (1997) 600-610
4. Bach M., and Ullrich D. Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials. Vision Res 34 (1994) 1541-1547
5. Bertenthal B.I., Proffitt D.R., and Cutting J.E. Infant sensitivity to figural coherence in biomechanical motions. J Exp Child Psychol 37 (1984) 213-230
6. Bertenthal B.I., Proffitt D.R., Kramer S.J., and Spetner N.B. Infants' encoding of kinetic displays varying in relative coherence. Dev Psychol 23 (1987) 171-178
7. Blake R., Turner L.M., Smoski M.J., Pozdol S.L., and Stone W.L. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol Sci 14 (2003) 151-157
8. Bonda E., Petrides M., Ostry D., and Evans A. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci 16 (1996) 3737-3744
9. Carter E.J., and Pelphrey K.A. School-aged children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion. Soc Neurosci 1 (2006) 396-411
10. Coch D., Skendzel W., Grossi G., and Neville H. Motion and color processing in school-age children and adults: an ERP study. Dev Sci 8 (2005) 372-386
11. Courchesne E. Chronology of postnatal human brain development: event-related potential, positron emission tomography, myelogenesis, and synaptogenesis studies. In: Rohrbaugh J.W., et al. (Ed). Event-related potentials basic issues and applications (1990), Oxford University Press, New York 210-241
12. Cutting J.E. A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 10 (1978) 91-94
13. Cutting J.E., and Kozlowski L.T. Recognition of friends by their walk. Bull Psychonom Soc 9 (1977) 353-356
14. Dittrich W.H. Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22 (1993) 15-22
15. Ellemberg D., Lewis T.L., Dirks M., Maurer D., Ledgeway T., Guillemot J.P., and Lepore F. Putting order into the development of sensitivity to global motion. Vision Res 44 (2004) 2403-2411
16. Foucher J.R., Otzenberger H., and Gounot D. The BOLD response and the gamma oscillations respond differently than evoked potentials: an interleaved EEG-fMRI study. BMC Neurosci 4 (2003) 22
17. Fox R., and McDaniel C. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218 (1982) 486-487
18. Freire A., Lewis T.L., Maurer D., and Blake R. The development of sensitivity to biological motion in noise. Perception 35 (2006) 647-657
19. Giaschi D., and Regan D. Development of motion-defined figure-ground segregation in preschool and older children, using a letter-identification task. Optom Vis Sci 74 (1997) 761-767
20. Gliga T., and Dehaene-Lambertz G. Structural encoding of body and face in human infants and adults. J Cogn Neurosci 17 (2005) 1328-1340
21. Gogtay N., Giedd J.N., Lusk L., Hayashi K.M., Greenstein D., Vaituzis A.C., Nugent III T.F., Herman D.H., Clasen L.S., Toga A.W., Rapoport J.L., and Thompson P.M. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 (2004) 8174-8179
22. Grezes J., Fonlupt P., Bertenthal B., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., and Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions?. Neuroimage 13 (2001) 775-785
23. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., and Blake R. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci 12 (2000) 711-720
24. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Res 41 (2001) 1475-1482
25. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 35 (2002) 1167-1175
26. Grossman E.D., Blake R., and Kim C.Y. Learning to see biological motion: brain activity parallels behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 16 (2004) 1669-1679
27. Gunn A., Cory E., Atkinson J., Braddick O., Wattam-Bell J., Guzzetta A., and Cioni G. Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia. Neuroreport 13 (2002) 843-847
28. Heinrich S.P., van der Smagt M.J., Bach M., and Hoffmann M.B. Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing. J Vis 4 (2004) 469-475
29. Hirai M., Fukushima H., and Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in humans. Neurosci Lett 344 (2003) 41-44
30. Hirai M., and Hiraki K. An event-related potentials study of biological motion perception in human infants. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 22 (2005) 301-304
31. Hirai M., and Kakigi R. Differential cortical processing of local and global motion information in biological motion: an event-related potential study. J Vis 8 16 (2008) 1-17
32. Hirai M., Senju A., Fukushima H., and Hiraki K. Active processing of biological motion perception: an ERP study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23 (2005) 387-396
33. Hoffmann M., Dorn T.J., and Bach M. Time course of motion adaptation: motion-onset visual evoked potentials and subjective estimates. Vision Res 39 (1999) 437-444
34. Howard R.J., Brammer M., Wright I., Woodruff P.W., Bullmore E.T., and Zeki S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr Biol 6 (1996) 1015-1019
35. Huttenlocher P.R. Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 517-527
36. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. J Cogn Neurosci 16 (2004) 487-502
37. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14 (1973) 201-211
38. Johansson G. Spatiotemporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception. An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychol Res 38 (1976) 379-393
39. Jokisch D., Daum I., Suchan B., and Troje N.F. Structural encoding and recognition of biological motion: evidence from event-related potentials and source analysis. Behav Brain Res 157 (2005) 195-204
40. Jordan H., Reiss J.E., Hoffman J.E., and Landau B. Intact perception of biological motion in the face of profound spatial deficits: Williams syndrome. Psychol Sci 13 (2002) 162-167
41. Kozlowski L.T., and Cutting J.E. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Percept Psychophys 21 (1977) 575-580
42. Kubova Z., Kuba M., Spekreijse H., and Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 35 (1995) 197-205
43. Langrova J., Kuba M., Kremlacek J., Kubova Z., and Vit F. Motion-onset VEPs reflect long maturation and early aging of visual motion-processing system. Vision Res 46 (2006) 536-544
44. Michels L., Lappe M., and Vaina L.M. Visual areas involved in the perception of human movement from dynamic form analysis. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 1037-1041
45. Mitchell T.V., and Neville H.J. Asynchronies in the development of electrophysiological responses to motion and color. J Cogn Neurosci 16 (2004) 1363-1374
46. Parrish E.E., Giaschi D.E., Boden C., and Dougherty R. The maturation of form and motion perception in school age children. Vision Res 45 (2005) 827-837
47. Passarotti A.M., Paul B.M., Bussiere J.R., Buxton R.B., Wong E.C., and Stiles J. The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study. Dev Sci 6 (2003) 100-117
48. Pavlova M., Krageloh-Mann I., Sokolov A., and Birbaumer N. Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception 30 (2001) 925-933
49. Pavlova M., Lutzenberger W., Sokolov A., and Birbaumer N. Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity. Cereb Cortex 14 (2004) 181-188
50. Pavlova M., Marconato F., Sokolov A., Braun C., Birbaumer N., and Krageloh-Mann I. Periventricular leukomalacia specifically affects cortical MEG response to biological motion. Ann Neurol 59 (2006) 415-419
51. Peelen M.V., and Downing P.E. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 8 (2007) 636-648
52. Peuskens H., Vanrie J., Verfaillie K., and Orban G.A. Specificity of regions processing biological motion. Eur J Neurosci 21 (2005) 2864-2875
53. Probst T., Plendl H., Paulus W., Wist E.R., and Scherg M. Identification of the visual motion area (area V5) in the human brain by dipole source analysis. Exp Brain Res 93 (1993) 345-351
54. Reid V.M., Hoehl S., and Striano T. The perception of biological motion by infants: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett 395 (2006) 211-214
55. Santi A., Servos P., Vatikiotis-Bateson E., Kuratate T., and Munhall K. Perceiving biological motion: dissociating visible speech from walking. J Cogn Neurosci 15 (2003) 800-809
56. Saygin A.P., Wilson S.M., Hagler Jr. D.J., Bates E., and Sereno M.I. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 6181-6188
57. Scherf K.S., Behrmann M., Humphreys K., and Luna B. Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. Dev Sci 10 (2007) F15-F30
58. Servos P., Osu R., Santi A., and Kawato M. The neural substrates of biological motion perception: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 12 (2002) 772-782
59. Simion F., Regolin L., and Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 (2008) 809-813
60. Stekelenburg J.J., and de Gelder B. The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: an ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport 15 (2004) 777-780
61. Taylor M.J. Non-spatial attentional effects on P1. Clin Neurophysiol 113 (2002) 1903-1908
62. Taylor M.J., Batty M., and Itier R.J. The faces of development: a review of early face processing over childhood. J Cogn Neurosci 16 (2004) 1426-1442
63. Taylor M.J., Edmonds G.E., McCarthy G., and Allison T. Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children. Neuroreport 12 (2001) 1671-1676
64. Taylor M.J., McCarthy G., Saliba E., and Degiovanni E. ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clin Neurophysiol 110 (1999) 910-915
65. Thierry G., Pegna A.J., Dodds C., Roberts M., Basan S., and Downing P. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 871-879
66. Vaina L.M., Solomon J., Chowdhury S., Sinha P., and Belliveau J.W. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 (2001) 11656-11661
67. Watanabe S., Kakigi R., and Puce A. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: a magneto- and electroencephalographic study. Neuroscience 116 (2003) 879-895