Does globalization impede environmental quality in India?

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 379-393

  Shahbaz, Muhammad ^a   Mallick, Hrushikesh ^b   Mahalik, Mantu Kumar ^c   Loganathan, Nanthakumar ^d  

^a Process and Energy Systems Engineering Center PRESTIGE   (Pakistan)

^b CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (India)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^d UNIVERSITI SULTAN ZAINAL ABIDIN   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Co2 emissions; Economic growth; Energy consumption; Globalization

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMICS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; PUBLIC POLICY;

BOUNDS TESTING APPROACHES; CO2 EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; GLOBALIZATION; STATIONARY PROPERTIES;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

ANNUAL VARIATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COINTEGRATION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; GLOBALIZATION;

INDIA;

EID: 84921758894     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. 2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35, 5412L 20.
2. Agenor, P.R., 2003. Does globalization hurt the poor? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2922, Washington, DC.
3. Akbostanci, E., Asik, S.T., Tunc, G.I., 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37, 861-867.
4. 2 emissions and economic growth in India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 3243-3251.
5. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., 2001. Is free trade good for the environment? Am. Econ. Rev. 91 (4), 877-908.
6. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., Mestre, R., 1998. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegrationin: a single-equation framework. J. Time Ser. Anal. 19 (3), 267-283.
7. Bayer, C., Hanck, C., 2013. Combining non-cointegration tests. J. Time Ser. Anal. 34 (1), 83-95.
8. 2 emissions. Environ. Dev. Sustain., http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-009-9187-2.
9. Boswijk, H.P., 1994. Testing for an unstable root in conditional and unconditional error correction models. J. Econ. 63 (1), 37-60.
10. Boutabba, M.A., 2014. The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ. Model. 40, 33-41.
11. Brown, R., Durbin, L.J., Evans, J.M., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J. R. Stat. Soc. 37, 149-192.
12. Chang, N., 2012. The empirical relationship between openness and environmental pollution in China. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 55 (6), 783-796.
13. Chaudhuri, S., Pfaff, A., 2002. Economic growth and the environment: what can we learn from household data? Working Paper. Columbia University, USA.
14. 2 emission and sustainable development in Chinese industry. Econ. Res. J. 4, 1-5.
15. Cole, M.A., 2006. Does trade liberalisation increase national energy use? Econ. Lett. 92, 108-112.
16. Cole, M.A., Elliott, R.J.R., 2003. Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 46 (3), 363-383.
17. Cole, M.A., Elliot, R.J.R., Zhang, J., 2011. Growth, foreign direct investment and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J. Reg. Sci. 51 (1), 121-138.
18. Copeland, B., Taylor, M., 1995. Trade and environment: a partial synthesis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77, 765-771.
19. Copeland, B., Taylor, M., 2004. Trade, growth and the environment. J. Econ. Lit. 42 (1), 7-71.
20. Dietzenbacher, E., Mukhopadhyay, K., 2007. An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green Leontief paradox? Environ. Resour. Econ. 36 (4), 427-449.
21. Dreher, A., 2006. Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl. Econ. 38, 1091-1110.
22. EIA, 2011. Country Analysis Briefs: India, http://www.eia.doe.gov
23. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276.
24. Engle, R.F., Yoo, B.S., 1991. Cointegrated economic time series: an overview with new results. In: Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. (Eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Fisher, R., 1932. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, London.
26. Ghosh, S., 2010. Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38, 3008-3014.
27. 2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Appl. Energy 104, 310-318.
28. Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1991. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914.
29. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37, 1156-1164.
30. Heckscher, E., 1919. The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekon. Tidskr., 497-512 (Translated as chapter 13 in American Economic Association, Readings in the Theory of International Trade, Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1949, 272-300, and a new translation is provided in Flam and Flanders).
31. Helpman, E., 1998. Explaining the structure of foreign trade: where do we stand. Rev. World Econ. 134, 573L 89.
32. Hoffmann, R., Lee, C.-G., Ramasamy, B., Yeung, B., 2005. FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. J. Int. Dev. 17, 311L 7.
33. Inder, B., 1993. Estimating long-run relationships in economics: a comparison of different approaches. J. Econom. 57 (1), 53-68.
34. Jalil, A., Feridun, M., 2011. The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ. 33, 284-291.
35. Joberta, T., Karanfil, K., 2007. Sectoral energy consumption by source and economic growth in Turkey. Energy Policy 35, 5447-5456.
36. Johansen, S., 1991. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59 (6), 1551-1580.
37. Johansen, S., 1995. A stastistical analysis of cointegration for I(2) variables. Econ. Theory 11 (01), 25-59.
38. Johansen, S., Juselius, K., 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 52 (2), 169-210.
39. Johansson, P.-O., Kriström, B., 2007. On a clear day you might see an environmental Kuznets curve. Environ. Resour. Econ. 37, 77-90.
40. Kanzilal, K., Ghosh, S., 2013. Environmental Kuznets curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unkown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56, 509-515.
41. Kaplan, M., Ozturk, I., Kalyoncu, H., 2011. Energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey: cointegration and causality analysis. Rom. J. Econ. Forecast. 2, 31-41.
42. Kaygusuz, K., 2009. Energy and environmental issues relating to greenhouse gas emissions for sustainable development in Turkey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 253-270.
43. Khanna, M., Zilberman, D., 2001. Adoption of energy efficient technologies and carbon abatement: the electricity generating sector in India. Energy Econ. 23, 637-658.
44. Kuznets, S., 1995. Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45, 1L 28.
45. Lee, J., Strazicich, M., 2013. Minimum LM unit root test with two structural break. Econ. Bull. 33 (4), 2483-2492.
46. Lütkepohl, H., 2006. Structural vector autoregressive analysis for cointegrated variables. AStA Adv. Stat. Anal. 90, 75-88.
47. 2 emissions and foreign trade: an IO approach applied to the Brazilian case. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques.
48. Mallick, H., Mahalik, M.K., 2014. Energy consumption, economic growth and financial development: a comparative perspective on India and China. Bull. Energy Econ. 2 (3), 72-84.
49. Managi, S., Hibiki, A., Tetsuya, T., 2008. Does trade liberalization reduce pollution emissions? Discussion Papers 08013. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
50. Mani, M., Wheeler, D., 1998. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy: 1960-1995. J. Environ. Dev. 7 (3), 215-247.
51. McCarney, G., Adamowicz, V.,2006. The effects of trade liberalization of the environment: an empirical study. In: 2006 Annual Meeting. International Association of Agricultural Economists.
52. McGuire, M., 1982. Regulation, factor rewards, the international trade. J. Public Econ. 17, 335-354.
53. Mongelli, I., Tassielli, G., Notarnicola, B., 2006. Global warming agreements, international trade and energy/carbon embodiments: an input-output approach to the Italian case. Energy Policy 34, 88L 100.
54. Mukhopadhyay, K., Chakraborty, D., 2005. Environmental impacts of trade in India. Int. Trade J. 29 (2), 135-163.
55. Narayan, P.K., 2005. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl. Econ. 37 (17), 1979-1990.
56. Nasir, M., Rehman, F.-U., 2011. Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39, 1857L 64.
57. Ohlin, B., 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge University Press, Harvard, MA.
58. 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 3220-3225.
59. Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A., 2013. The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ. 36 (3), 262-267.
60. 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38, 7850-7860.
61. Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 16, 289-326.
62. Pesavento, E., 2004. Analytical evaluation of the power of tests for the absence of cointegration. J. Econom. 122 (2), 349-384.
63. Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E., 1990. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 57 (1), 99-125.
64. Porter, M., Van Der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9 (4), 97-118.
65. Runge, C.F., 1994. Freer Trade, Protected Environment. Council on Foreign Relations Press, New York.
66. Schmalensee, R., Stoker, T.M., Judson, R.A., 1998. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80, 15-27.
67. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H.H., Shabbier, M.M., 2012. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and granger causality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 2947-2953.
68. Shahbaz, M., Ozturk, I., Afza, T., Ali, A., 2013a. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25, 494-502.
69. Shahbaz, M., Mutascu, M., Azim, P., 2013b. Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18, 165-173.
70. 2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25, 109-121.
71. 2 emissions in Bangladesh. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 31 (3), 575-586.
72. Siebert, H., 1977. Environmental quality and the gains from trade. Kyklos 30, 657-673.
73. Soytasa, U., Saria, R., 2009. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol. Econ. 68, 1667-1675.
74. Stern, D.I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32, 1419-1439.
75. Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W., 1993. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61 (4), 783-820.
76. Tamazian, A., Chousaa, J.P., Vadlamannatia, K.C., 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37, 246-253.
77. 2 emissions, and economic growth: a revisit of the evidence from India. Appl. Econom. Int. Dev. 11 (2), 165-189.
78. 2 emissions, and economics growth: evidence from India. Indian Econ. Rev. 47 (1), 57-87.
79. Tiwari, A.K., Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q.M.A., 2013. The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18, 519-527.
80. Wagner, M., 2008. The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resour. Energy Econ. 30, 388-408.
81. Yang, Z., Zhao, Y., 2014. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in India: evidence from directed acyclic graphs. Econ. Model. 38, 533-540.
82. Zhang, Y.-J., 2011. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39, 2197-2203.
83. Zhang, X.P., Cheng, X.-M., 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in China. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2706L 12.