CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 7850-7860

  Pao, Hsiao Tien ^a   Tsai, Chung Ming ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

BRIC; Carbon dioxide emission; Error correction model

Indexed keywords

BRIC; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; ENERGY CONSERVATION POLICY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY DEPENDENT; ENERGY SUPPLIES; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; EQUILIBRIUM ENERGY; ERROR CORRECTION MODEL; LONG TERM; PANEL CAUSALITY; POLLUTANT EMISSION; SHAPE PATTERNS; SHORT TERM; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS;

ALGEBRA; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING; IMAGE RECORDING;

INVESTMENTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY USE; ERROR CORRECTION; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; KUZNETS CURVE; NUMERICAL MODEL;

BRAZIL; CHINA; INDIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION;

EID: 78049435912     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Akbostanci E., Turut-Asik S., Tunc G.I. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?. Energy Policy 2009, 37:861-867.
2. Al-Iriani M.A. Energy-GDP relationship revisited: an example from GCC countries using panel causality. Energy Policy 2006, 34:3342-3350.
3. Alves D.C.O., Bueno R.D. Short-run, long-run and cross elasticities of gasoline demand in Brazil. Energy Economics 2003, 25:191-199.
4. Ang J.B. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4772-4778.
5. Ang J.B. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling 2008, 30:271-278.
6. Apergis N., Payne J.E. CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3282-3286.
7. Asafa-Adjaye J. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics 2000, 22:615-625.
8. Belloumi M. Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2745-2753.
9. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics 2000, 15:161-177.
10. Brown R., Durbin J., Evans J. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 1975, 37:149-172.
11. Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 2001, 20:249-272.
12. Coondoo D., Dinda S. The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:375-385.
13. Dinda S. A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 2004, 53:403-413.
14. Dinda S., Coondoo D. Income and emission: a panel data based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics 2006, 57:167-181.
15. Douglas, J. 2006. India claims its emissions cause no harm to world's atmosphere. Natural News.
16. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2007. International Energy Statistics.
17. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
18. 2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics 2003, 45:133-148.
19. Goldman Sachs, 2003. Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050. Global Economics Paper no. 99.
20. Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194, NBER, Cambridge.
21. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1156-1164.
22. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 2003, 115:53-74.
23. Inman, M., 2008. China CO2 emissions growing faster than anticipated. National Geographic News.
24. Jarque C.M., Bera A.K. Efficient tests for normality, homoskedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters 1980, 6:255-259.
25. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with approach. Oxford Bullentin of Economics and Statistics 1990, 52:169-209.
26. Kao C. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 1999, 90:1-44.
27. Kraft J., Kraft A. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 1978, 3:401-403.
28. La Rovere, E.L., Pereira, A.S., 2007. Brazil & climate change: a country profile. Science and Development Network.
29. 2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 2009, 37:413-423.
30. Levine A., Lin C.F., Chu C.S. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 108:1-24.
31. Maddala G.S., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:631-652.
32. Mahadevan R., Asafu-Adjaye J. Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2481-2490.
33. Managi S., Jena P.R. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:432-440.
34. 2. Economics Letters 2004, 82:121-126.
35. Masih A.M.M., Masih R. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics 1996, 18:165-183.
36. Mehrara M. Energy consumption and economic growth: the case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2939-2945.
37. Murray, J. 2009. Medvedev: Russian emissions could increase under new target. BusinessGreen.
38. Narayan P.K., Narayan S., Prasad A. A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: evidence from the G7 countries. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2765-2769.
39. Oh W., Lee K. Energy consumption and economic growth in Korea: testing the causality relation. Journal of Policy Modeling 2004, 26:973-981.
40. Oxley, L., Greasley, D., 1998. Vector autoregression, cointegration and causality: testing for causes of the British industrial revolution, Applied Economics 30, 1387-1397.
41. Pao H.T. Forecast of electricity consumption and economic growth in Taiwan by state space modeling. Energy 2009, 34:1779-1791.
42. Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1999, 61:653-670.
43. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 2004, 20:597-625.
44. Phillips P.C., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 75:335-346.
45. Shiu A., Lam P.L. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy policy 2004, 32:47-54.
46. Soytas U., Sari R. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2706-2712.
47. Soytas U., Sari R., Ewing B.T. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 2007, 62:482-489.
48. Stern D.I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 2004, 32:1419-1439.
49. Tamazian A., Chousa J.P., Vadlamannati K.C. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 2009, 37:246-253.
50. The World Bank, 2007a. Growth and CO2 emissions: how do different countries fare. Environment Department, Washington, DC.
51. The World Bank The Little Green Data Book 2007 2007, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
52. Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 1995, 66:225-250.
53. Wagner M. The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics?. Resource and Energy Economics 2008, 30:388-408.
54. Yoo S.H. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1627-1632.
55. Yuan J., Zhao C., Yu S., Hu Z. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics 2007, 29:1179-1191.
56. Zapata H.O., Rambaldi A.N. Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1997, 59:285-298.
57. Zhang X.P., Cheng X.M. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:2706-2712.