Theories and control models and motor learning: Clinical applications in neuro-rehabilitation;Teorías y modelos de control y aprendizaje motor. Aplicaciones clínicas en neurorrehabilitación

Neurologia

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 32-41

  Cano de la Cuerda, R ^a   Molero Sanchez A ^a,b   Carratala Tejada M ^a   Alguacil Diego, I M ^a   Molina Rueda, F ^a   Miangolarra Page, J C ^a,c   Torricelli, D ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE FUENLABRADA   (Spain)

^d CENTRE FOR AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Models; Motor control; Motor learning; Neuro rehabilitation; Neurological diseases; Theories

Indexed keywords

BRAIN FUNCTION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROSCIENCE; REHABILITATION CARE; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEMS THEORY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEUROREHABILITATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BRAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION;

EID: 84921728574     PISSN: 02134853     EISSN: 15781968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.12.010     Document Type: Short Survey

References (97)

1. Abernethy B. The biophysical foundations of human movement 1997, Human Kinetics, Illinois.
2. Nicolsky G. Teorías de control motor ¿nuevos conceptos en rehabilitación neuropediátrica kinésica del niño con parálisis cerebral?. Arch Neurol Neuroc Neuropsiquiatr 2007, 14:41-47.
3. Shumway-Cook A., Wollacott M.H. Motor Control: Theory and practical applications 2000, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
4. Sherrington C.S. The integrative action of the nervous system 1906, Yale University Press, New Haven.
5. Brunnstrom S. Movement theory in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach 1970, Harper & Row, New York.
6. Sherrington C.S. Flexion-reflex of the limb, crossed extension-reflex, and reflex stepping and standing. J Physiol 1910, 40:28-121.
7. Sherrington C.S. Strychnine and reflex inhibition of skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1907, 36:185-204.
8. Sherrington C.S. Observations on the scratch reflex in the spinal dog. J Physiol 1906, 34:1-50.
9. Woodworth R.S., Sherrington C.S. A pseudaffective reflex and its spinal path. J Physiol 1904, 31:234-243.
10. Sherrington C.S. Qualitative difference of spinal reflex corresponding with qualitative difference of cutaneous stimulus. J Physiol 1903, 30:39-46.
11. Sherrington C.S. Decerebrate rigidity and reflex coordination of movements. J Physiol 1898, 22:319-332.
12. Burke R.E. Sir Charles Sherrington's the integrative action of the nervous system: a centenary appreciation. Brain 2007, 130:887-894.
13. Bobath K. The normal postural reflex mechanism and its deviation in children with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy 1971, 57:515-525.
14. Graham J.V., Eustace C., Brock K., Swain E., Irwin-Carruthers S. The Bobath concept in contemporary clinical practice. Top Stroke Rehabilil 2009, 16:57-68.
15. Gesell. Developmental pediatrics. J Pediatr 1947, 30:188-194.
16. McGraw M. Neuromuscular maturation of the human infant 1945, Hafner, New York.
17. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning: a behavioural emphasis 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign.
18. Smith J.L., Smith R.F., Zernicke Hay M. Locomotion in exercised and nonexercised cats cordotomized at two or twelve weeks of age. Exp Neurol 1982, 16:394-413.
19. Aruin A.S., Bernstein N.A. The biomechanical foundations of a safe labour environment: Bernstein's vision in 1930. Engine Control 2002, 6:3-18.
20. Barbeau H., Wainberg M., Finch L. Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1987, 25:341-344.
21. Barbeau H., Danakas M., Arsenault B. Effects of locomotor training in spinal cord injured subjects: a preliminary study. ReSTOR Neurol Neurosci 1993, 5:81-84.
22. Rossignol I.S., Barbeau H. New approaches to locomotor rehabilitation in spinal cord injury [editorial]. Ann Neurol 1995, 37:555-556.
23. Edgerton V.R., De Leon R.D., Tillakaratne N., Recktenwald M.R, Hodgson J.A., Roy R.R. Use-dependent plasticity in spinal stepping and standing. ADV Neurol 1997, 72:233-247.
24. Barbeau H. Locomotive training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003, 17:3-11.
25. Bernstein N. The coordination and regulation of movement 1967, Pergamon, London.
26. Edelman G.M., Sporns O. Solving Bernstein's problem: a proposal for the development of coordinated movement by selection. Child Development 1993, 64:960-981.
27. Kamm K., Thelen, Jensen J. A dynamical systems approach to motor development. Movement science 1991, Suitable, Alexandria. J.M. Rothstein (Ed.).
28. Perry S.B. Clinical implications of a dynamical systems theory. Neurol Report 1998, 22:4-10.
29. León-Carrión J. Artificial neural networks and Luria neuropsychological theory. Spanish Journal of Neuropsychology 2002, 4:168-178.
30. Baron R.J. The brain computer 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum, London.
31. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart J.L. DCs memory and representation of general and specific information. Q J Exp Psychol 1996, 114:159-188.
32. Greene P.H. Why is it easy to control your arms. J Mot Behav 1982, 14:260-286.
33. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
34. Latash M.L. Evolution of motor control: from reflexes and motor programs to the equilibrium-point hypothesis. J Hum Kinet 2008, 19:3-24.
35. Strap M. Functional neuroanatomy of implicit learning: associative, motor, and habit. Rev Neurol 2007, 44:234-242.
36. Morgado I. Psychology of learning and memory: basics and recent advances. Rev Neurol 2005, 40:289-297.
37. Abernethy B., Hanrahan S., Kippers V., MacKinnon L., Pandy M. The biophysical foundations of human movement 1997, Human Kinetics, Illinois.
38. Magill R.A. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications 2007, McGraw-Hill, Hardcover.
39. Schmidt R.A., Wrisberg C.A. Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-based Learning Approach 2004, Human Kinetics, Champaign.
40. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning. A behavioral emphasis 2005, Human Kinetics, Champaign.
41. Molina-Rueda F., Perez-Cruz S. Reflections on physiotherapy: motor learning, how to learn our patients. Issues of physiotherapy 2010, 39:211-218.
42. Greenwood R., Barnes M.P., McMillan T.M., Ward C.D. Handbook of neurological rehabilitation 2003, Psychology Press, London.
43. Gallahue D.L., Ozmun J.C. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents and adults 2006, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
44. Umphred D.A., Carlson C. Neurorehabilitation for the physical therapist assistant 2006, Ed Slack, London.
45. Lee T.D., Genovese E.D. Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1988, 59:277-287.
46. Read T.D. On the dynamics of motor learning research. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 1998, 69:334-337.
47. Shumway-Cook A., Wollacott M. Motor Control: Theory and practical applications 2000, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
48. Shumway-Cook A., Wollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol 2000, 55:10-16.
49. George A., Fitzpatrick D., Hall W.C., Lamantia A.S., Mcnamara J.O., Purves D., et al. Neuroscience 2008, Panamerican Medical Publishing, Madrid.
50. Flores A. Feedback and motor learning: influence of actions taken prior to the receipt of the knowledge of the results in the learning and retention of motor skills [doctoral thesis] 2005, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.
51. Sullivan J.K., Kantak S.S., Burtner A.P. Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition. Physical Therapy 2008, 88:720-732.
52. Whipple R. Improving balance in older adults: identifying the significant training stimuli. Gait disorders in aging. Falls and therapeutic strategies 1997, Lipincott-Raven, Philadelphia. J.C. Masdeu, L. Sudarsky, L. Wolfson (Eds.).
53. Duncan P., Richards L., Wallace D. A randomized controlled pilot study of home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke 1998, 29:2055-2060.
54. Lamb Robertson M.C., Gillespie W.J., Gillespie L.D., Cumming R.G., Rowe B.H. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, 4:CD000340.
55. Suzuki T., Kim H., Yoshida H., Ishizaki T. Randomized controlled trial of exercise intervention for the prevention of falls in community-dwelling elderly Japanese women. J Bone Mineral Metabol 2004, 22:602-611.
56. DeBolt L.S., McCubbin J.A. The effects of home-based resistance exercise on balance, power and mobility in adult with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2004, 85:290-297.
57. Shumway-Cook A., Woollacott M.H. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice 2007, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
58. Lelard T., Doutrellot P.L., David P., Ahmaidi S. Effects of a 12-week tai chi chuan program versus a balance training program on postural control and walking ability in older people. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2010, 91:9-14.
59. Hackney I., Earhart G.M. Tai Chi improves balance and mobility in people with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 2008, 28:456-460.
60. Lin S.I., Woollacott M. Association between sensorimotor function and functional and reactive balance control in the elderly. Age & Ageing 2005, 34:358-363.
61. Silsupadol P., Siu K.C., Shumway-Cook A., Woollacott M.H. Training of balance under single - and dual-task conditions in older adults with balance impairment. Physical Therapy 2006, 86:269-281.
62. Genthon N., Gissot A.S., Froger J., Rougier P., Pérennou D. Posturography in patients with stroke: estimating the percentage of body weight on each foot from a single force platform. Stroke 2008, 39:489.
63. Leroux A., Pinet H. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke: changes in clinical and laboratory measures of balance and mobility. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2006, 85:820-830.
64. Paeth B. Experiences with the Bobath concept 2006, Panamericana, Madrid.
65. Moors JS, F, Ballero, Jáuregui S, Float MP. Rehabilitation in stroke [consultado 23/11/2011]. Disponible en:. http://www.cfnavarra.es/salud/anales/textos/vol23/suple3/suple19.html.
66. Carr J.H., Shepherd R.B. Neurological rehabilitation optimizing motor performance 1998, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
67. Moseley AM, Stark, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke (Traducida Cochrane review). En: The Cochrane Library Plus 2007, number 4.
68. Jöbges E.M., Spittler-Schneiders H., Renner C.I.E., Hummelsheim H. Clinical relevance of rehabilitation programs for patients with idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome (II): Tool-specific therapeutic approaches. Parkinsonism Rel Res 2007, 13:203-213.
69. Lindquist A., Prado C., Ricardo M.L. Gait training combining partial body-weight support and functional electrical stimulation: effects on poststroke gait. Phys Ther 2007, 87:1144-1154.
70. Eng J.J., Tang P.F. Gait retraining strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 2007, 7:1417-1436.
71. Lynch E.A., Hillier S.L., Stiller K., Campanella R.R., Fisher P.H. Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke: a randomized controller pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2007, 88:1101-1107.
72. Woodford H, Price C. EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke (revision prophylaxis). En: The Cochrane Library Plus 2007, number 4.
73. Lünenburger L., Colombo G., Riener R. Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehab 2007, 4:1.
74. Engardt M., Knutsson Jonsson M., Sternhag M. Dynamic muscle strength training in stroke patients: effects of knee extension torque, electromyographic activity and motor function. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1995, 76:419-425.
75. Morris S.L., Dodd K.J., Morris M.E. Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehab 2004, 18:27-39.
76. Manheim C.J., Lavett D.K. The myofascial release manual 1989, Slack, Parsippany.
77. Byl N. Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity stable poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004, 17:176-191.
78. Rosen B., Lundborg G. Early use of artificial sensibility to improve sensory recovery after repair of the median and ulnar nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 2003, 37:54-57.
79. Stoykov M., Stojakovich M., Stevens J.A. Beneficial effects of posture intervention on prehensile action for an individual with ataxia resulting from brainstem stroke. Nerorehabilitation 2005, 20:85-89.
80. Herdman S. Vestibular rehabilitation 2000, FA Davis, Philadelphia.
81. Levin M.F., Michaelsen S.M, Tie C.M., Brami R. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemparesis. Exp Brain Res 2002, 143:171-180.
82. Duff S.V., Gordon A.M. Learning of grasp control in children with cerebral palsy hemiparetic. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003, 45:404-412.
83. Exner E.C., Henderson A. Cognition and motor skill. Hand function in the child: foundations for remediation 1995, Mosby, Philadelphia. A. Henderson, C. Pehoski (Eds.).
84. Erhart M.O.P. Developmental dysfunction hand: theory, assessment and treatment 1982, Therapi Skill Builders, Tucson.
85. Dunn W., Brown C., McGuigan A. The ecology of human performance: a framework for considering the effect of the context. Am J Occup Ter 1994, 48:595-607.
86. Case-Smith J. Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on hand-writing. Am J Occup Ter 2002, 56:17-25.
87. Ma H.I., Trombly C.A. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, Part II: Remediation of impairments. Am J Occup Ter 2002, 56:260-274.
88. Charles J., Gordon A.M. A critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy and forced use in children with hemiplegia. Neural Plast 2005, 12:245-261.
89. Langhorne P., Coupar F., Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009, 8:741-754.
90. Combe-Waller S., Whitall J. Fine motor control in adults with and without chronic hemiparesis: baseline comparison to nondisabled adults and effects of bilateral arm training. Arch Phys Med Rehabilil 2004, 85:1076-1083.
91. Wetter S., Poole J.L., Haaland K.Y. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabilil 2005, 86:776-781.
92. Scheffler L.R., Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve 2007, 35:562-590.
93. Huang H., Wolf S.L., He J. Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. Neuroengineering Rehab 2006, 3:11.
94. Leuthardt E.C., Schalk G., Roland J., Rouse Moran D.W. Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology. Neurosurg Focus 2009, 27:4.
95. Kwakkel G., Krebs B.J., Kollen H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb after stroke recovery: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:111-121.
96. Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabili Med 2009, 41:955-960.
97. Swinnen E., Duerinck S., Baeyens J.P., Meeusen R., Kerckhofs E. Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehab Med 2010, 42:520-526.