Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 29, Issue 9 SUPPL., 2014, Pages 169-172

  Taunton, Michael J ^a   Mason, J Bohannon ^b   Odum, Susan M ^b   Springer, Bryan D ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Direct anterior approach; Outcomes; Posterior approach; Primary total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERCLAGE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRUTCH; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEBRIDEMENT; DIRECT ANTERIOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINI POSTERIOR APPROACH TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT FORM 12; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKER; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX; WOUND COMPLICATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOSIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; EARLY AMBULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 84921683483     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1153.
2. Inaba Y., Dorr L., Wan Z., et al. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:104.
3. Pagnano M.W., et al. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(5):1000.
4. Berger R.A. The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 2004, 53:149.
5. Bertin K.C., Rattinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:248.
6. Chimento G.F., Pavone V, Sharrock N, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(2):139.
7. Howell J.R., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin N Am 2004, 35(2):153.
8. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:115.
9. O'Brien D.A., Rorabeck C.H. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:99.
10. Ogonda L., Wilson R, Archbold P, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg A 2005, 87(4):701.
11. Sculco T.P. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(4 Suppl 1):78.
12. Siguier T., Siguier M., Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 426:164.
13. Vail T.P., Callaghan J.J. Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15(12):707.
14. Woolson S.T., Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg A 2004, 86(7):1353.
15. Wright J.M., Crockett HC, Delgado S, et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(5):538.
16. Gore D.R., Murray MP, Sepic SB, et al. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982, 165:180.
17. Mayr E., Nogler M., Benedetti M.G., et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech 2009, 24.
18. Nakata K., Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach. Two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(5):698.
19. Meneghini R.M., Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Peterson versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:293.