Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer

JAMA Surgery

Volumn 150, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 9-16

  Kummerow, Kristy L ^a,b   Du, Liping ^b   Penson, David F ^a,b   Shyr, Yu ^b   Hooks, Mary A ^b  

^a GERIATRIC RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CLINICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVATION SURGERY; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; AGE; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER STAGING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TRENDS; TUMOR INVASION; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; ODDS RATIO; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921666565     PISSN: 21686254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312(11):665-673.
2. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del VecchioM, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(1):6-11.
3. NIH Consensus Conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265(3):391-395.
4. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. 2013 Breast Cancer Standards Manual. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2013.
5. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177-4181.
6. Dragun AE, Pan J, Riley EC, et al. Increasing use of elective mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic surgery among breast conservation candidates: a 14-year report from a comprehensive cancer center. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;36(4):375-380.
7. Dragun AE, Huang B, Tucker TC, SpanosWJ. Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice. Breast J. 2012;18(4):318-325.
8. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at theMayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperativemagnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082-4088.
9. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? a 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2682-2690.
10. Mahmood U, Hanlon AL, KoshyM, et al. Increasing national mastectomy rates for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1436-1443.
11. Showalter SL, Grover S, Sharma S, Lin L, Czerniecki BJ. Factors influencing surgical and adjuvant therapy in stage I breast cancer: a SEER 18 database analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1287-1294.
12. RavalMV, Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY. Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(8):488-490.
13. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5203-5209.
14. Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(6):546-552.
15. Hawley ST, Jagsi R, MorrowM, et al. Social and clinical determinants of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):582-589.
16. Rosenberg SM, TracyMS, MeyerME, et al. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(6):373-381.
17. Yang RL, Newman AS, Lin IC, et al. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation. Cancer. 2013;119(13):2462-2468.
18. Garcia-Etienne CA, Tomatis M, Heil J, et al; eusomaDB Working Group. Mastectomy trends for early-stage breast cancer: a report from the EUSOMA multi-institutional European database. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(13):1947-1956.
19. Nelson HD, Fu R, Goddard K, et al. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: Systematic Review to Update the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
20. Lee CN, Chang Y, Adimorah N, et al. Decision making about surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J AmColl Surg. 2012;214(1):1-10.