A semantic-based approach to attain reproducibility of computational environments in scientific workflows: A case study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8805, Issue , 2014, Pages 452-463

  Santana Perez, Idafen ^a   da Silva, Rafael Ferreira ^b   Rynge, Mats ^b   Deelman, Ewa ^b   Pérez Hernández, María S ^a   Corcho, Oscar ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

COMPUTATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS; COMPUTING PLATFORM; EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; WORKFLOW APPLICATIONS; WORKFLOW EXECUTION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84921625018     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14325-5_39     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud: Amazon EC2, http://aws. amazon. com/ec2.
2. Azarnoosh, S., Mats, Rynge, o.: Introducing precip: an api for managing repeatable experiments in the cloud. In: 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science. CloudCom, vol. 2, pp. 19-26 (2013).
3. Belhajjame, K., Corcho, O., et al.: Workflow-centric research objects: First class citizens in scholarly discourse. In: Proc. Workshop on the Semantic Publishing (SePublica), Crete, Greece (2012).
4. Berriman, G. B., Deelman, E., et al.: Montage: a grid-enabled engine for delivering custom science-grade mosaics on demand. In: SPIE Conference on Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation, vol. 5493, pp. 221-232 (2004).
5. Bonnet, P., Manegold, S., et al.: Repeatability and workability evaluation of sigmod. SIGMOD Rec. 40(2), 45-48 (2011).
6. Brammer, G. R., Crosby, R. W., et al.: Paper mache: Creating dynamic reproducible science. Procedia Computer Science 4(0), 658-667 (2011); Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science.
7. Chirigati, F., Shasha, D., Freire, J.: Reprozip: Using provenance to support computational reproducibility (2013).
8. Deelman, E., Gurmeet, Singh, o.: Pegasus: A framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming 13(3) (2005).
9. Drummond, C.: Replicability is not reproducibility: Nor is it good science. In: Proceedings of the Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning Workshop at the 26th ICML (2009).
10. Executable paper grand challenge (2011), http://www. executablepapers. com/.
11. Futuregrid, http://portal. futuregrid. org.
12. Gavish, M., Donoho, D.: A universal identifier for computational results. Procedia Computer Science 4, 637-647 (2011); Proceedings of the ICCS 2011.
13. Van Gorp, P., Mazanek, S.: Share: a web portal for creating and sharing executable research papers. Procedia Computer Science 4, 589-597 (2011); Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS 2011.
14. Howe, B.: Virtual appliances, cloud computing, and reproducible research. Computing in Science Engineering 14(4), 36-41 (2012).
15. Mao, B., Hong, Jiang, o.: Read-performance optimization for deduplication-based storage systems in the cloud. Trans. Storage 10(2) (2014).
16. Matthews, B., Shaon, A., et al.: Towards a methodology for software preservation (2009).
17. Owl 2 web ontology language, http://www. w3. org/TR/owl2-overview/.
18. Reproducible research: Addressing the need for data and code sharing in computational science (2009), http://www. stanford. edu/~vcs/Conferences/RoundtableNov212009/RoundtableOutputDeclaration. pdf.
19. De Roure, D., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: Designing the myexperiment virtual research environment for the social sharing of workflows. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, pp. 603-610 (2007).
20. Stodden, V., Leisch, F., Peng, R. D.: Implementing Reproducible Research. Chapman and Hall (2014).
21. Strodl, S., Mayer, R., Antunes, G., Draws, D., Rauber, A.: Digital preservation of a process and its application to e-science experiments (2013).
22. Taylor, I., Deelman, E., et al.: Workflows for e-Science. Springer (2007).
23. Thain, D., Tannenbaum, T., Livny, M.: Distributed computing in practice: The condor experience: Research articles. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exper. 17(2-4), 323-356 (2005).
24. Zhao, J., Gomez-Perez, J. M., et al.: Why workflows break-understanding and combating decay in taverna workflows. In: 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science, pp. 1-9 (2012).
25. Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., et al.: Liquid: A scalable deduplication file system for virtual machine images. IEEE Trans. on Paral. and Distr. Syst. (99) (2013).