Assessing the significance of wetland restoration scenarios on sediment mitigation plan

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 77, Issue , 2015, Pages 103-113

  Martinez Martinez, Edwin ^a   Nejadhashemi, A Pouyan ^a,b   Woznicki, Sean A ^b   Adhikari, Umesh ^b   Giri, Subhasis ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Sediment; SUSTAIN; SWAT; Wetland restoration

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; ECONOMICS; LAND USE; REDUCTION; RESTORATION; SEDIMENTS; WATERSHEDS;

ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE; SEDIMENT REDUCTION; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SUSTAIN; SWAT; WATERSHED MODELING; WETLAND FUNCTIONS; WETLAND RESTORATION;

WETLANDS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; INSTALLATION; MITIGATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIVER BASIN; SEDIMENT; STREAMFLOW; WATER TREATMENT; WATERSHED; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

MICHIGAN; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84921521782     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.031     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Alvi K., Zhen J.X., Paul S., Rafi T. SUSTAIN a Framework for Placement of Best Management Practices in Urban Watersheds to Protect Water Quality. EPA/600/R-09/095 2009, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory-Water Supply and Water Resources Division, Cincinnati, OH.
2. Arheimer B., Torstensson G., Wittgren H.B. Landscape planning to reduce coastal eutrophication: agricultural practices and constructed wetlands. Landsc. Urban Plan 2004, 67:205-215.
3. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34(1):73-89.
4. Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Srinivasan R., Williams J.R., Haney E.B., Neitsch S.L. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Input/Output File Documentation, Version 2009 2011, Agrilife Blackland Research Center, Temple, TX.
5. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., Donigian A.S., Johanson R.C. Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran, Users manual for version 11 1997, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.
6. Biebighauser T.R. Wetland Drainage, Restoration, and Repair 2007, University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
7. Biebighauser T.R. Wetland Restoration and Construction: A Technical Guide 2011, Upper Susquehanna Coalition, Owego, NY.
8. Biswas S., Vacik H., Swanson M.E., Haque S.S. Evaluating integrated watershed management using multiple criteria analysis-a case study at Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184(5):2741-2761.
9. Brix H. Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: system design, removal processes, and treatment performance. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement 1993, 9-22. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL. G.A. Moshiri (Ed.).
10. Caldwell P.V., Vepraskas M.J., Skaggs R.W., Gregory J.D. Simulating the water budgets of natural Carolina bay wetlands. Wetlands 2007, 27(4):1112-1123.
11. Carter V. Wetland hydrology, water quality, and associated functions. National Water Summary on Wetland Resources. Water-Supply Paper 2425 1996, 35-48. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. J.D. Fretwell, J.S. Williams, P.J. Redman (Eds.).
12. CDL, 2012. USDA national agricultural statistics service cropland data layer. Published crop-specific data layer. Available online at: (assessed 20.07.13.). http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape//.
13. Chang C.L., Chao Y.C. Using the analytical hierarchy process to assess the environmental vulnerabilities of basins in Taiwan. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184(5):2939-2945.
14. Chen Y., Yu J., Khan S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25(12):1582-1591.
15. Comin F.A., Romero J.A., Astorga V., Garcia C. Nitrogen removal and cycling in restored wetlands used as filters of nutrients for agricultural runoff. Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference 1997, 255-261.
16. Dai Z., Li C., Trettin C., Sun G., Amatya D., Li H. Bi-criteria evaluation of MIKE SHE model for a forested watershed on South Carolina coastal plain. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2010, 7(1):179-219.
17. De Laney T.A. Benefits to downstream flood attenuation and water quality as a result of constructed wetlands in agricultural landscapes. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1995, 50(6):620-626.
18. Dodge, K.E., 1998. River Raisin assessment, in: Fisheries Special Report No. 23. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Ann Arbor, MI. eWater, 2012. Appendix G: Selecting Appropriate k and C* Values. eWater, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Available online at: . http://training.ewater.com.au/mod/resource/view.php%3Fid=41.
19. Fan X., Cui B., Zhao H., Zhang Z. The changes of wetland network pattern associated with water quality in the Pearl River Delta, China. Clean-Soil Air Water 2012, 40(10):1064-1075.
20. Feng X.Q., Zhang G.X., Xu Y.J. Simulation of hydrological processes in the Zhalong wetland within a river basin, Northeast China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17:2797-2807.
21. Gassman P.W., Sadeghi A.M., Srinivasan R. Applications of the SWAT model special section: overview and insights. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43(1):1-8.
22. Giri S., Nejadhashemi A.P. Application of analytical hierarchy process for effective selection of agricultural best management practices. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 132(2014):165-177.
23. Hart R.A. Mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) Habitat Suitability Criteria for the Otter Tail River, Minnesota. MS Thesis 1995, North Dakota State University, Department of Agriculture and Applied Science, Fargo, ND.
24. Huber W.C., Dickinson R.E. Storm Water Management Model: User's Manual Version IV 1988, US Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
25. James W., Huber W.C., Pitt R.E., Dickinson R.E., Rosener L.A., Aldrich J.A., James W.R. SWMM 4 User's Manual (User's Guide to the EPA Stormwater Management Model and to PCSWMM) 2002, University of Guelph and CHAI, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
26. Jia Z., Luo W. A modified climate diagram displaying net water requirements of wetlands in arid and semi-arid regions. Agri. Water Manage. 2009, 96(9):1339-1343.
27. Jordan T.E., Whigham D.F., Hofmockel K.H., Pittek M.A. Nutrient and sediment removal by a restored wetland receiving agricultural runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:1534-1547.
28. Kadlec R.H., Knight R.L. Treatment Wetlands 1996, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
29. Keddy P.A. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
30. Kadlec R.H. The effects of wetland vegetation and morphology on nitrogen processing. Ecol. Eng. 2008, 33(2):126-141.
31. Knutilla R.L., Allen W.B. Water Resources of the River Raisin Basin, Southeastern Michigan 1975, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
32. Koo B.H., Byeon Y.C., Park M. Analyzing the landscape ecological and hydraulic values of inland type small wetlands in the same watershed using eco-hydraulic model. Adv. Mat. Res. 2013, 726:4922-4928.
33. Liu Y., Yang W., Wang X. Development of a SWAT extension module to simulate riparian wetland hydrologic processes at a watershed scale. Hydrol. Processes 2008, 22(16):2901-2915.
34. Linkov, I., Steevens, J., 2013. A detailed analysis of the theoretical foundation of different MCDA (Chapter 35). Appendix A: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. (Online) . http://www.epa.gov/cyano_habs_symposium/monograph/Ch35_AppA.pdf.
35. Linsley R.K., Franzini J.B., Freyberg D.L., Tchobanoglous G. Water-Resources Engineering 1992, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 4th ed.
36. Luecke D.F. Commentary on the Mississippi flood. Environment 1993, 35:4.
37. Maidment D. Handbook of Hydrology 1993, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
38. Martinez-Martinez E., Nejadhashemi A.P., Woznicki S.A., Love B.J. Modeling the hydrological significance of wetland restoration scenarios. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 133:121-134.
39. Mitsch W.J. The nonpoint source pollution control function of natural and constructed riparian wetlands. Global Wetlands: Old World and New 1994, 351-361. Elsevier Science and Technology Books, New York, NY. W.J. Mitsch (Ed.).
40. MNFI Vegetation Circa 1800 2014, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Lansing, Michigan.
41. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Blingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
42. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406. Retrieved from: . http://twri.tamu.edu/reports/2011/tr406.pdf.
43. Nilsson, E., Sha, L., Qian, W., Leedo, M., 2011. Constructed Wetland: Wastewater treatment. VVAN01 Decentralized Water and Wastewater Treatment, 1-13.
44. NLCD National Land Cover Database 2001, U.S. Geological Survey, Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC), Sioux Falls, SD, Available at: www.mrlc.gov/nlcd.php. (accessed 10.04.14.).
45. Obropta C., Kallin P., Mak M., Ravit B. Modeling urban wetland hydrology for the restoration of a forested riparian. Wetland Ecosyst. 2008, 5(1):183-198.
46. Park D., Roesner L.A. Modeling performances of detention basins with uncertainty analysis. Proceedings of the World Environment and Water Resources Congress 2009.
47. Perez-Vega S., Salmeron-Ochoa I., Nieva-de la Hidalga A., Sharratt P.N. Analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) for the selection of solvents in early stages of pharmaceutical process development. Process Saf. Environ. 2011, 89(4):261-267.
48. Persson J., Somes N.L.G., Wong T.H.F. Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40(3):291-300.
49. Ramsar, 2004. Wetland Values and functions fact sheet. http://www.ramsar.org.
50. Ryan J.A., Bell R.M., Davidson J.M., O'Connor G.A. Plant uptake of non-inorganic chemicals from spills. Chemosphere 1988, 17:2299-2323.
51. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
52. Schwar M.T. Restoration of rivers and wetlands: advancing the State of Hydrologic Design. Proceedings of the ASCE Wetlands Engineering River Restoration Conference New Jersey 1998, 6.
53. Schröder P., Navarro-Avino J., Azaizeh H., Goldhirsh A.G., DiGregorio S., Komives T., Langergraber G., Lenz A., Maestri E., Memon A.R., Ranallill A., Sebastiani L., Smrcek S., Vanek T., Vuilleumier S., Wissing F. Using phytoremediation technologies to upgrade waste water treatment in Europe. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2007, 14:490-497.
54. Şener Ş., Şener E., Nas B., Karagüzel R. Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beyşehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey). Waste Manage. 2010, 30(11):2037-2046.
55. Shoemaker L., Riverson J., Alvi K., Zhen J.X., Paul S., Rafi T. SUSTAIN: a Framework for Placement of Best Management Practices in Urban Watersheds to Protect Water Quality 2009, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/sustain/.
56. Skaggs R.W., Breve M.A., Mohammad A.T., Parsons J.E., Gilliam J.W. Simulation of drainage water quality with DRAINMOD. Irrig. Drain. Syst. 1995, 9(3):259-277.
57. Skagen S.K., Melcher C.P., Haukos D.A. Reducing sedimentation of depressional wetlands in agricultural landscapes. Wetlands 2008, 28:594-604.
58. Srinivasan R., Ramanarayanan T.S., Arnold J.G., Bednarz S.T. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part II: Model application. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 1998, 34:91-101.
59. Thompson J.R., Sorenson H.R., Gavin H., Refsgaard A. Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. J. Hydrol. 2004, 293(1):151-179.
60. Tsihrintzis V.A., John D.L., Tremblay P.J. Hydrodynamic modeling of wetlands for flood detention. Water Resour. Manage. 1998, 12(4):251-269.
61. USEPA Constructed Wetlands Treatment of Municipal Wastewaters 2000, 152. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
62. USDA-NRCS, 2003. Wetland restoration and enhancement techniques. Wetland restoration, enhancement and management. Indiana Biology Technical Note No. 1. Available online at: . http://www.parcplace.org/images/stories/pdfs/indianatechnote1.pdf.
63. USDA-NRCS, 2009. Constructed Wetlands. National Engineering Handbook. 210-VI-NEH, amend.33 (Chapter 3). Available online at: . http://ftp://ftp.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/wntsc/H&H/NEHhydrology/ch3.pdf.
64. USDA-NRCS, 2011. Farmable Wetlands Program. Michigan Conservation Reserve Program CRP-CP 27 and 28. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online at: . http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_007884.pdf.
65. USDA-NRCS, 2013. Web soil survey. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available online at: (assessed 15.02.13.). http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.
66. USDA-NRCS, 2013. Field Office Technical Guide- Statewide Conservation Practice: Typical Installation Cost Information. Michigan USDA/NRCS State Office, East Lansing, MI. Available at: , (assessed 10.04.13.). http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/treemenuFS.aspx.
67. Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 380(1):48-65.
68. Wang X., Yang W., Melesse A.M. Using hydrologic equivalent wetland concept within SWAT to estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. Trans. ASABE 2008, 51(1):55e72.
69. Wang X., Shang S., Zhongy Q., Tingzi L., Melesse A.M., Wanhong Y. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91:1511-1525.
70. Wong T.H., Fletcher T.D., Duncan H.P., Coleman J.R., Jenkins G.A. A model for urban stormwater improvement conceptualization. Global Solutions Urban Drainage 2002, 8-13.
71. Wu K.S., Johnston C.A. Hydrologic comparison between a forested and a wetland/lake dominated watershed using SWAT. Hydrol. Processes 2008, 22:1431-1442.
72. Young K.D., Kibler D.F., Benham B.L., Loganathan G.V. Application of the analytical hierarchical process for improved selection of storm-water BMPs. J. Water Res. Plan Manage. 2009, 135(4):264-275.
73. Young K.D., Dymond R.L., Kibler D.F. Development of an improved approach for selecting storm-water best management practices. J. Water Res. Plan Manage. 2011, 137(3):268-275.
74. Zacharias I., Dimitriou E., Koussouris T. Integrated water management scenarios for wetland protection: application in Trichonis Lake. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20(2):177-185.
75. Zhang J., Ross M., Trout K., Zhou D. Calibration of the HSPF model with a new coupled FTABLE generation method. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2009, 19(12):1747-1755.