PH stable thin film composite polyamine nanofiltration membranes by interfacial polymerisation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 478, Issue , 2015, Pages 75-84

  Lee, Kah P ^a   Zheng, Jumeng ^a,b   Bargeman, Gerrald ^c   Kemperman, Antoine J B ^a   Benes, Nieck E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b PWN Technologies   (Netherlands)

^c AKZO NOBEL CENTRAL RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Extreme pH; Hydrolysis; Interfacial polymerisation; Polyamine; Thin film composite

Indexed keywords

HYDROLYSIS; NANOCOMPOSITE FILMS; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PH; POLYAMIDES; POLYMERIZATION; SODIUM CHLORIDE; THIN FILMS;

ISO-ELECTRIC POINTS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; NUCLEOPHILIC ATTACK; POLYAMIDE MEMBRANES; POLYAMINES; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; THIN FILM COMPOSITES; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES;

AMIDE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CHLORIDE; POLYAMIDE; POLYAMINE; POLYETHERSULFONE; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; FILM; HYDROLYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; IONIC STRENGTH; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR SIZE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; NUCLEOPHILICITY; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PH; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84921502124     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Luo J., Wan Y. Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration - a critical review. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 438:18-28.
2. Vandezande P., Gevers L.E.M., Vankelecom I.F.J. Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37:365-405.
3. Trägårdh G., Johansson D. Purification of alkaline cleaning solutions from the dairy industry using membrane separation technology. Desalination 1998, 119:21-29.
4. Bargeman G., Steensma M., ten Kate A., Westerink J.B., Demmer R.L.M., Bakkenes H., Manuhutu C.F.H. Nanofiltration as energy-efficient solution for sulfate waste in vacuum salt production. Desalination 2009, 245:460-468.
5. Nyström M., Kaipia L., Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 98:249-262.
6. Bes-Piá A., Iborra-Clar M.I., Iborra-Clar A., Mendoza-Roca J.A., Cuartas-Uribe B., Alcaina-Miranda M.I. Nanofiltration of textile industry wastewater using a physicochemical process as a pre-treatment. Desalination 2005, 178:343-349.
7. Schlesinger R., Götzinger G., Sixta H., Friedl A., Harasek M. Evaluation of alkali resistant nanofiltration membranes for the separation of hemicellulose from concentrated alkaline process liquors. Desalination 2006, 192:303-314.
8. Jakobs D., Baumgarten G. Nanofiltration of nitric acidic solutions from picture tube production. Desalination 2002, 145:65-68.
9. Blöcher C., Niewersch C., Melin T. Phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge with a hybrid process of low pressure wet oxidation and nanofiltration. Water Res. 2012, 46:2009-2019.
10. Platt S., Nyström M., Bottino A., Capannelli G. Stability of NF membranes under extreme acidic conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 239:91-103.
11. Visser T.J.K., Modise S.J., Krieg H.M., Keizer K. The removal of acid sulphate pollution by nanofiltration. Desalination 2001, 140:79-86.
12. Lee K.P., Arnot T.C., Mattia D. A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination-development to date and future potential. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 370:1-22.
13. Yao C.W., Burford R.P., Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D., McDonogh R.M. Hydrolysis and other phenomena affecting structure and performance of polyamide 6 membrane. J. Appl. Polym. 1987, 34:2399-2408.
14. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. Effect of pH on the performance of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:228-238.
15. Dalwani M., Bargeman G., Hosseiny S.S., Boerrigter M., Wessling M., Benes N.E. Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) based composite membranes for nanofiltration of acidic and alkaline media. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 381:81-89.
16. Han R. Formation and characterization of (melamine-TMC) based thin film composite NF membranes for improved thermal and chlorine resistances. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425-426:176-181.
17. Freger V., Bottino A., Capannelli G., Perry M., Gitis V., Belfer S. Characterization of novel acid-stable NF membranes before and after exposure to acid using ATR-FTIR, TEM and AFM. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 256:134-142.
18. A. Wait, T. Cath, N. Hancock, X. Mayer, K. Dahm, D. Heil, P. Xu, J. Drewes, Novel thermally/chemically resistant nanofiltration membranes for sustainable reclamation of CBM produced water, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Petroleum and Biofuels Environmental Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2010.
19. Kovács Z., Samhaber W. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes with uncharged solutes. Membrántechnika 2008, 12:22-36.
20. W.C. Rice, J.P. Puglia, High performance composite membrane, US Patent 6536605.
21. M. Perry, V. Ginzburg, B. Ginzburg, P. Lapido, Solvent and acid stable membranes, methods of manufacture thereof and methods of use thereof inter alia for separating metal ions from liquid process streams, WIPO Patent Application WO/2010/082194.
22. C. Linder, G. Aviv, M. Perry, R. Kotraro, Chemically modified semipermeable polysulfone membranes and their use in reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration, US Patent 4690766.
23. J. E. Cadotte, Reverse osmosis membrane, US Patent 4039440.
24. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. A method for characterizing membranes during nanofiltration at extreme pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:188-194.
25. Jahanshahi M., Rahimpour A., Peyravi M. Developing thin film composite poly(piperazine-amide) and poly(vinyl-alcohol) nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2010, 257:129-136.
26. Freger V. Nanoscale heterogeneity of polyamide membranes formed by interfacial polymerisation. Langmuir 2003, 19:4791-4797.
27. Mänttäri M., Pihlajamäki A., Nyström M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:311-320.
28. Bargeman G., Vollenbroek J.M., Straatsma J., Schroën C.G.P.H., Boom R.M. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:11-20.
29. Feng C., Xu J., Li M., Tang Y., Gao C. Studies on a novel nanofiltration membrane prepared by cross-linking of polyethyleneimine on polyacrylonitrile substrate. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 451:103-110.
30. Chiang Y.C., Hsub Y.Z., Ruaan R.C., Chuang C.J., Tung K.L. Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:19-26.
31. Dražević E., Košutić K., Freger V. Permeability and selectivity of reverse osmosis membranes: correlation to swelling revisited. Water Res. 2014, 49:444-452.
32. Wijmans J.G., Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107:1-21.
33. Wang T., Yang Y., Zheng J., Zhang Q., Zhang S. A novel highly permeable positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on a nanoporous hyper-crosslinked polyamide barrier layer. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 448:180-189.
34. R.A. Larson, E.J. Weber, Hydrolysis, in: Reaction mechanisms in environmental organic chemistry, CRC Press, Florida, 1994, p. 131.