Host range expansion of native insects to exotic trees increases with area of introduction and the presence of congeneric native trees

Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 69-77

  Branco, Manuela ^a   Brockerhoff, Eckehard G ^b,c   Castagneyrol, Bastien ^d,e,f   Orazio, Christophe ^g   Jactel, Hervé ^d,e  

^a Universidade de Lisboa   (Portugal)

^b SCION   (New Zealand)

^c Better Border Biosecurity Collaboration   (New Zealand)

^d UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^g European Forest Institute EFI   (France)

Author keywords

Damage; Exotic trees; Host expansion; Host range; Native insects; Phylogenetic relatedness; Plantation forest

Indexed keywords

HABITAT SELECTION; HERBIVORE; HOST RANGE; INSECT; NATIVE SPECIES; RELATEDNESS; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TREE;

EUROPE;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84921481606     PISSN: 00218901     EISSN: 13652664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12362     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 105-121.
2. Bertheau, C., Salle, A., Roux-Morabito, G., Garcia, J., Certain, G. & Lieutier, F. (2009) Preference-performance relationship and influence of plant relatedness on host use by Pityogenes chalcographus L. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 11, 389-396.
3. Bertheau, C., Brockerhoff, E.G., Roux-Morabito, G., Lieutier, F. & Jactel, H. (2010) Novel insect-tree associations resulting from accidental and intentional biological 'invasions': a meta-analysis of effects on insect fitness. Ecology Letters, 13, 506-515.
4. Branco, M., Brockerhoff, E.G., Castagneyrol, B., Orazio, C. & Jactel, H. (2015) Data from: Host range expansion of native insects to exotic trees increases with area of introduction and presence of congeneric native trees. Dryad Digital Repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tr61n.
5. Brändle, M., Kühn, I., Klotz, S., Belle, C. & Brandl, R. (2008) Species richness of herbivores on exotic host plants increases with time since introduction of the host. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 905-912.
6. Brockerhoff, E.G., Liebhold, A.M. & Jactel, H. (2006) The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 263-268.
7. Brockerhoff, E.G., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J.A. & Ferraz, S.F.B. (2013) Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management, 301, 43-50.
8. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., USA.
9. Canadell, J.G. & Raupach, M.R. (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science, 320, 1456-1457.
10. Carrillo-Gavilán, A., Moreira, X., Zas, R., Vilà, M. & Sampedro, L. (2012) Early resistance of alien and native pines against two native generalist insect herbivores: no support for the natural enemy hypothesis. Functional Ecology, 26, 283-293.
11. Castagneyrol, B., Jactel, H., Vacher, C., Brockerhoff, E.G. & Koricheva, J. (2014) Effects of plant phylogenetic diversity on herbivory depend on herbivore specialization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 134-141.
12. Chun, Y.J., van Kleunen, M. & Dawson, W. (2010) The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecology Letters, 13, 937-946.
13. Colautti, R.I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters, 7, 721-733.
14. Connor, E.F., Faeth, S.H., Simberloff, D. & Opler, P.A. (2008) Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees. Ecological Entomology, 5, 205-211.
15. Crisp, M.D. & Cook, L.G. (2011) Cenozoic extinctions account for the low diversity of extant gymnosperms compared with angiosperms. New Phytologist, 192, 997-1009.
16. Dajoz, R. (1998) Les insectes et la fôret: rôle et diversité des insectes dans le milieu forestier. Lavoisier Technique et Documentation. Paris, France.
17. FAO (2001) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2001. FAO Forestry Paper 140.
18. FAO (2006) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2006. FAO Forestry Paper 147.
19. FAO (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, 378 pp. FAO Forestry paper 163. FAO, Rome, Italy.
20. Fraser, S.M. & Lawton, J.H. (1994) Host range expansion by British moths onto introduced conifers. Ecological Entomology, 19, 127-137.
21. Goßner, M.M., Chao, A., Bailey, R.I. & Prinzing, A. (2009) Native fauna on exotic trees: phylogenetic conservatism and geographic contingency in two lineages of phytophages on two lineages of trees. The American Naturalist, 173, 599-614.
22. Harvey, K.J., Nipperess, D.A., Britton, D.R. & Hughes, L. (2012) Australian family ties: does a lack of relatives help invasive plants escape natural enemies? Biological Invasions, 14, 2423-2434.
23. Keane, R.M. & Crawley, M.J. (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 164-170.
24. Kennedy, C.E.J. & Southwood, T.R.E. (1984) The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a re-analysis. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 53, 455-478.
25. Langström, B., Lieutier, F., Hellqvist, C. & Vouland, G. (1995) North American pines as hosts for Tomicus piniperda L. (Col. Scolytidae) in France and in Sweden. Behaviour, Population Dynamics and Control of Forest Insects (eds F.P. Hain, S.M. Salom, W. Ravlin, T.L. Payne & K.F. Raffa), pp. 547-558. Ohio State University, OARDC, Wooster, OH, USA.
26. Leather, S.R. (1986) Insect species richness of the British Rosaceae: the importance of host range, plant architecture, age of establishment, taxonomic isolation and species-area relationships. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 841-860.
27. Ledgard, N. (2001) The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Dougl.) in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 141, 43-57.
28. Liu, H. & Stiling, P. (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Invasions, 8, 1535-1545.
29. Lombardero, M.J., Alonso-Rodríguez, M. & Roca-Posada, E.P. (2012) Tree insects and pathogens display opposite tendencies to attack native vs. non-native pines. Forest Ecology and Management, 281, 121-129.
30. Mooney, H.A. & Cleland, E.E. (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 5446-5451.
31. Morrison, W.E. & Hay, M.E. (2011) Herbivore preference for native vs. exotic plants: generalist herbivores from multiple continents prefer exotic plants that are evolutionarily naïve. PLoS One, 6, e17227.
32. Neuvonen, S. & Niemelä, P. (1981) Species richness of macrolepidoptera on Finnish deciduous trees and shrubs. Oecologia, 51, 364-370.
33. Niemelä, P. & Mattson, W.J. (1996) Invasion of North American forests by European phytophagous insects. BioScience, 46, 741-753.
34. Novotny, V. & Basset, Y. (2005) Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proceedings. Biological sciences/The Royal Society, 272, 1083-1090.
35. Orians, C.M. & Ward, D. (2010) Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments. Annual Review of Entomology, 55, 439-459.
36. Parker, J.D., Burkepile, D.E. & Hay, M.E. (2006) Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science, 311, 1459-1461.
37. Parker, J.D., Burkepile, D.E., Lajeunesse, M.J. & Lind, E.M. (2012) Phylogenetic isolation increases plant success despite increasing susceptibility to generalist herbivores. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 1-9.
38. Pearse, I.S. & Hipp, A.L. (2009) Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 18097-18102.
39. Pearse, I.S., Harris, D.J., Karban, R. & Sih, A. (2013) Predicting novel herbivore-plant interactions. Oikos, 122, 1554-1564.
40. Price, P.W., Fernandes, G.W. & Waring, G.L. (1987) Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environmental Entomology, 16, 15-24.
41. Pullin, A.S. & Stewart, G.B. (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology, 20, 1647-1656.
42. Ricciardi, A. & Ward, J.M. (2006) Comment on "Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions". Science, 313, 298.
43. Roques, A., Auger-Rozenberg, M.-A. & Boivin, S. (2006) A lack of native congeners may limit colonization of introduced conifers by indigenous insects in Europe. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 299-313.
44. Schelhaas, M.J., Varis, S., Schuck, A. & Nabuurs, G.J. (2006) EFISCEN Inventory Database. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland. http://www.efi.int/portal/virtual_library/databases/efiscen/inventory_database/.
45. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.V. (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 12, 1-20.
46. Sims, R.E.H. (2003) Bioenergy Options for a Cleaner Environment: In Developed and Developing Countries, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK.
47. Strong, D.R., McCoy, E.D. & Rey, J.R. (1977) Time and number of herbivore species: the pests of sugarcane. Ecology, 58, 167-175.
48. Tahvanainen, J. & Niemelä, P. (1987) Biogeographical and evolutionary aspects of insect herbivory. Annales Botanici Fennici, 24, 239-247.
49. Thompson, J.N. (1999) Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. The American Naturalist, 153, S1-S14.
50. Ward, J.R. & Lafferty, K.D. (2004) The elusive baseline of marine disease: are diseases in ocean ecosystems increasing? PLoS Biology, 2, e120.
51. Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D. & Kembel, S.W. (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics, 24, 2098-2100.
52. Webb, C.O. & Donoghue, M.J. (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 181-183.
53. White, E.P., Adler, P.B., Lauenroth, W.K., Gill, R.A., Greenberg, D., Kaufman, D.M. et al. (2006) A comparison of the species-time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups. Oikos, 112, 185-195.
54. Wikström, N., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M.W. (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings. Biological sciences/The Royal Society, 268, 2211-2220.
55. Zas, R., Moreira, X. & Sampedro, L. (2011) Tolerance and induced resistance in a native and an exotic pine species: relevant traits for invasion ecology. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1316-1326.
56. Zhang, Y., Chen, H.Y. & Reich, P.B. (2012) Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology, 100, 742-749.
57. Zobel, B.G., Van Wyk, G. & Stahl, P. (1987) Growing Exotic Forests, p. 508. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.