Predicting novel herbivore-plant interactions

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1554-1564

  Pearse, Ian S ^a,b   Harris, David J ^b   Karban, Richard ^b   Sih, Andrew ^b  

^a Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DIGESTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERBIVORE; HOST PLANT; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION; RANGE EXPANSION; WEED;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84886289232     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00527.x     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Agosta S. J. 2006. On ecological fitting, plant-insect associations, herbivore host shifts and host plant selection. Oikos 114: 556-565.
2. Agrawal A. A. and Karban R. 1997. Domatia mediate plant- arthropod mutualism. Nature 387: 562-563.
3. Agrawal A. A. and Kotanen P. M. 2003. Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol. Lett. 6: 712-715.
4. Agrawal A. A. and Fishbein M. 2006. Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87: S132-S149.
5. Agrawal A. A. et al. 2005. Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86: 2979-2989.
6. Ahn H. J. 2008. A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Info. Sci. 178: 37-51.
7. Aide T. M. 1992. Dry season leaf production - an excape from herbivory. Biotropica 24: 532-537.
8. Altermatt F. 2010. Tell me what you eat and I'll tell you when you fly: diet can predict phenological changes in response to climate change. Ecol. Lett. 13: 1475-1484.
9. Barrett L. G. and Heil M. 2012. Unifying concepts and mechanisms in the specificity of plant-enemy interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 17: 282-292.
10. Beaton L. L. et al. 2011. Comparison of the herbivore defense and competitive ability of ancestral and modern genotypes of an invasive plant, Lespedeza cuneata. Oikos 120: 1413-1419.
11. Becerra J. X. 1997. Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science 276: 253-256.
12. Bertheau C. et al. 2010. Novel insect-tree associations resulting from accidental and intentional biological 'invasions': a meta-analysis of effects on insect fitness. Ecol. Lett. 13: 506-515.
13. Blossey B. and Notzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants - a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83: 887-889.
14. Brandle M. et al. 2008. Species richness of herbivores on exotic host-plants increases with time since introduction of the host. Divers. Distrib. 14: 905-912.
15. Brunet J.-P. et al. 2004. Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 4164-4169.
16. Campbell S. A. and Borden J. H. 2009. Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-hosts during host selection by woodboring insects. Oikos 118: 553-563.
17. Carmona D. et al. 2011. Plant traits that predict resistance to herbivores. Funct. Ecol. 25: 358-367.
18. Carroll S. P. and Boyd C. 1992. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug - natural history with the history. Evolution 46: 1052-1069.
19. Carroll S. P. et al. 1997. Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51: 1182-1188.
20. Carroll S. P. et al. 1998. Rapidly evolving adaptations to host ecology and nutrition in the soapberry bug. Evol. Ecol. 12: 955-968.
21. Colautti R. I. et al. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol. Lett. 7: 721-733.
22. Connor E. F. et al. 1980. Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a copmarison of introduced and native trees. Ecol. Entomol. 5: 205-211.
23. Courant A. V. et al. 1994. Native pierine butterfly (Pieridae) adapting to naturalized crucifer? J. Lepidopt. Soc. 48: 168-170.
24. Dawkins R. and Krebs J. R. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. B 205: 489-511.
25. Dawson W. et al. 2009. Herbivory is related to taxonomic isolation, but not to invasiveness of tropical alien plants. Divers. Distrib. 15: 141-147.
26. Egan S. P. and Funk D. J. 2006. Individual advantages to ecological specialization: insights on cognitive constraints from three conspecific taxa. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 843-848.
27. Ehrlich P. R. and Raven P. H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608.
28. Feeny P. P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10: 1-40.
29. Fine P. V. A. et al. 2006. The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. Ecology 87: S150-S162.
30. Forister M. L. and Wilson J. S. 2013. The population ecology of novel plant-herbivore interactions. Oikos 122: 657-666.
31. Forister M. L. et al. 2009. Host range evolution is not driven by the optimization of larval performance: the case of Lycaeides melissa (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the colonization of alfalfa. Oecologia 160: 551-561.
32. Gilbert G. S. et al. 2012. Evolutionary tools for phytosanitary risk analysis: phylogenetic signal as a predictor of host range of plant pests and pathogens. Evol. Appl. 5: 869-878.
33. Gilroy J. J. and Sutherland W. J. 2007. Beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 351-356.
34. Gripenberg S. et al. 2010. A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 13: 383-393.
35. Harvey J. A. et al. 2010a. Ecological fits, mis-fits and lotteries involving insect herbivores on the invasive plant, Bunias orientalis. Biol. Invas. 12: 3045-3059.
36. Harvey J. A. et al. 2010b. Interactions between invasive plants and insect herbivores: a plea for a multitrophic perspective. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2251-2259.
37. Harvey K. et al. 2012. Australian family ties: does a lack of relatives help invasive plants escape natural enemies? Biol. Invas. 14: 2423-2434.
38. Heil M. 2008. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol. 178: 41-61.
39. Hill S. B. and Kotanen P. M. 2009. Evidence that phylogene tically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory. Oecologia 161: 581-590.
40. Hill S. B. and Kotanen P. M. 2010. Phylogenetically structured damage to Asteraceae: susceptibility of native and exotic species to foliar herbivores. Biol. Invas. 12: 3333-3342.
41. Hill S. B. and Kotanen P. M. 2011. Phylogenetic structure predicts capitular damage to Asteraceae better than origin or phylogenetic distance to natives. Oecologia 166: 843-851.
42. Hinton G. E. and Salakhutdinov R. R. 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313: 504-507.
43. Janz N. et al. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55: 783-796.
44. Janzen D. H. 1985. On ecological fitting. Oikos 45: 308-310.
45. Johnson M. T. J. and Agrawal A. A. 2007. Covariation and composition of arthropod species across plant genotypes of evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Oikos 116: 941-956.
46. Karowe D. N. 1990. Predicting host range evolution - colonization of Coronilla varia by Colias philodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Evolution 44: 1637-1647.
47. Keane R. M. and Crawley M. J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 164-170.
48. Keeler M. S. and Chew F. S. 2008. Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host. Oecologia 156: 559-568.
49. Koren Y. et al. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Comput. 42: 30-37.
50. Kursar T. A. and Coley P. D. 2003. Convergence in defense syndromes of young leaves in tropical rainforests. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31: 929-949.
51. Lach L. et al. 2010. Contrasting effects of an invasive ant on a native and an invasive plant. Biol. Invas. 12: 3123-3133.
52. Lee C. E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 386-391.
53. Louda S. M. et al. 2003. Nontarget effects - the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48: 365-396.
54. Mack R. N. et al. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl. 10: 689-710.
55. Maron J. L. and Vilá M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95: 361-373.
56. McBride C. S. and Singer M. C. 2010. Field studies reveal strong postmating isolation between ecologically divergent butterfly populations. PloS Biol. 8: 17.
57. McEvoy P. B. 2002. Insect-plant interactions on a planet of weeds. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 165-179.
58. McEvoy P. B. and Coombs E. M. 1999. Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments and structured population models. Ecol. Appl. 9: 387-401.
59. Morrison W. E. and Hay M. E. 2011. Herbivore preference for native vs exotic plants: generalist herbivores from multiple continents prefer exotic plants that are evolutionarily naive. PloS ONE 6: 7.
60. NAS 2002. Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. - National Academy Press.
61. Ness J. H. et al. 2011. Phylogenetic distance can predict susceptibility to attack by natural enemies. Oikos 120: 1327-1334.
62. Nielsen D. G. et al. 2011. Interspecific variation in resistance of Asian, European and North American birches (Betula spp.) to bronze birch borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environ. Entomol. 40: 648-653.
63. Odegaard F. et al. 2005. The importance of plant relatedness for host utilization among phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 8: 612-617.
64. Orians C. M. and Ward D. 2010. Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55: 439-459.
65. Pagel M. D. and Harvey P. H. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
66. Parker J. D. et al. 2006. Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311: 1459-1461.
67. Parker J. D. et al. 2012. Phylogenetic isolation increases plant success despite increasing susceptibility to generalist herbivores. Divers. Distrib. 18: 1-9.
68. Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 637-669.
69. Pearse I. S. 2011. Leaf defensive traits in oaks and their role in both preference and performance of a polyphagous herbivore, Orgyia vetusta. Ecol. Entomol. 36: 635-642.
70. Pearse I. S. and Hipp A. L. 2009. Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 18097-18102.
71. Pearse I. S. and Hipp A. L. 2012. Global patterns of leaf defenses in oak species are predicted by seasonality, precipitation and temperature. Evolution 66: 2272-2286.
72. Peterson A. T. et al. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. - Princeton Univ. Press.
73. Raffa K. F. and Berryman A. A. 1983. The role of host-plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 53: 27-49.
74. Rasmann S. et al. 2005. Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature 434: 732-737.
75. Ricklefs R. E. 2008. Foliage chemistry and the distribution of Lepidoptera larvae on broad-leaved trees in southern Ontario. Oecologia 157: 53-67.
76. Salakhutdinov R. R. and Hinton G. E. 2007. Learning a nonlinear embedding by preserving class neighbourhood structure. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Omnipress.
77. Schein A. I. et al. 2002. Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. Proceeding SIGIR '02. Proc. 25th Annu. Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and development in information retrieval.
78. Schlaepfer M. A. et al. 2005. Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol. Lett. 8: 241-246.
79. Siemann E. and Rogers W. E. 2003. Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecol. Appl. 13: 1503-1507.
80. Sih A. et al. 1985. Predation, competition, and prey communities - a review of field experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 269-311.
81. Sih A. et al. 2010. Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119: 610-621.
82. Simberloff D. and Stiling P. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology 77: 1965-1974.
83. Simberloff D. et al. 2005. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3: 12-20.
84. Singer M. C. and McBride C. S. 2010. Multitrait, host-associated divergence among sets of butterfly populations: implications fot reproductive isolation and ecological speciation. Evolution 64: 921-933.
85. Singer M. C. et al. 1993. Rapid human-induced evolution of insect host associations. Nature 366: 681-683.
86. Stamp N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 23-55.
87. Strauss S. Y. et al. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 9: 357-374.
88. Templeton A. R. 2006. Population genetics and microevolutionary theory. - Wiley.
89. Turlings T. C. J. et al. 1990. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250: 1251-1253.
90. Van Zandt P. A. and Mopper S. 1998. A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. Am. Nat. 152: 595-604.
91. Verhoeven K. J. F. et al. 2009. Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naïve? Ecol. Lett. 12: 107-117.
92. Vourc'h G. et al. 2002. Disentangling the causes of damage variation by deer browsing on young Thuja plicata. Oikos 98: 271-283.
93. Webster B. et al. 2010. Volatiles functioning as host cues in a blend become nonhost cues when presented alone to the black bean aphid. Anim. Behav. 79: 451-457.
94. Weiblen G. D. et al. 2006. Phylogenetic dispersion of host use in a tropical insect herbivore community. Ecology 87: S62-S75.
95. Zangerl A. R. and Berenbaum M. R. 2003. Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution 57: 806-815.
96. Zangerl A. R. and Berenbaum M. R. 2005. Increase in toxicity of an invasive weed after reassociation with its coevolved herbivore. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 15529-15532.