The development of mathematical competencies sources of individual differences and their developmental trajectories

Human Development from Early Childhood to Early Adulthood: Findings from a 20 Year Longitudinal Study

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 221-237

  Stern, Elsbeth ^a  

^a Research on Learning and Instruction   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921350829     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203888544     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Baroody, A. J., & Lai, M-L. (2007). Preschoolers’ understanding of the addition-subtraction inverse principle: A Taiwanese sample. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9, 131-171.
2. Baumert, J., Artelt, C., Klieme, E., & Stanat, P. (2002). PISA-Programme for International Student Assessment: Zielsetzung, theoretische Konzeption und Entwicklung von MeBverfahren. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessungen in Schulen (2nd ed., pp. 285-310). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
3. Baumert, J., Lehmann, R., Lehrke, M., Schmitz, B., Clausen, M., Hosenfeld, I., et al. (1997). TIMMS-Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich: Deskriptive Befunde [TIMMS: Mathematical-scientific lessons in international comparison: Descriptive findings]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
4. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307-314.
5. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1990). Teacher belief scale: Cognitively guided instruction project. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
6. Fuson, K., Stigler, J. W., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 449-456.
7. Geary, D. C. (2005). Folk knowledge and academic learning. In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind (pp. 493-519). New York: Guilford.
8. Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276-295). New York: Macmillan.
9. Hannula, M. M., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and mathematical skills of young children. Learning and Instruction, 15(3), 237-256.
10. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592.
11. Jager, A. O., SUB, H-M., & Beauducel, A. (1997). Berliner Intelligenzstruktur-Test. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
12. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. (2006). Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 1, 316-343.
13. Schneider, W., & Stefanek, J. (2004). Entwicklungsveranderungen allgemeiner kognitiver Fahigkeiten und schulbezogener Fertigkeiten: Evidenz fur einen Schereneffekt? [Developmental changes in cognitive abilities and school-related skills in children and adolescents: Evidence for a widening gap?]. Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 36, 147-159.
14. Spelke, E. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for science and mathematics? American Psychologist, 60, 950-958.
15. Staub, F., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 144-155.
16. Stern, E. (1993). What makes certain arithmetic word problems involving the comparison of sets so hard for children? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 7-23.
17. Stern, E. (1998). Die Entwicklung des mathematischen Verstandnisses im Kindesalter [The development of mathematical understanding in childhood]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
18. Stern, E. (1999). Development of mathematical competencies. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3-12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study (pp. 154-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Stern, E. (2005). Knowledge restructuring as a powerful mechanism of cognitive development: How to lay an early foundation for conceptual understanding in formal domains. In P. D. Tomlinson, J. Dockrell, & P. Winne (Eds.), Pedagogy: Teaching for learning (British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series 2, No. 3; pp. 153-169). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
20. Stern, E., & Lehrndorfer, A. (1992). The role of situational context in solving word problems. Cognitive Development, 7, 259-268.