Psychometric properties of the Nottwil environmental factors inventory short form

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 233-240

  Ballert, Carolina S ^a,b   Post, Marcel W ^a,c   Brinkhof, Martin W ^a,b   Reinhardt, Jan D ^a,b,d  

^a SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Environment; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Social participation; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; ITEM TOTAL CORRELATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOTTWIL ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INVENTORY SHORT FORM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAPLEGIA; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RASCH ANALYSIS; RESIDENT; SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SWISS; AGED; ATTITUDE; DISABLED PERSON; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SWITZERLAND; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABLED PERSONS; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84921342360     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. G. Whiteneck, M.A. Meade, M. Dijkers, D.G. Tate, T. Bushnik, and M.B. Forchheimer Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 2004 1793 1803
2. World Health Organization Chapter 7: spinal cord injury and enabling environments J. Bickenbach, A. Officer, T. Shakespeare, P. von Groote, WHO international perspectives on spinal cord injury 2013 World Health Organization Geneva 147 166
3. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) 2001 World Health Organization Geneva
4. R. Escorpizo, S. Graf, and A. Marti Domain sets and measurement instruments on participation and environmental factors in spinal cord injury research Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90 11 Suppl 2 2011 S66 S78
5. J. Reinhardt, and M. Post Measurement and evidence of environmental determinants of participation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 15 2010 26 48
6. G.G. Whiteneck, C.L. Harrison-Felix, D.C. Mellick, C.A. Brooks, S.B. Charlifue, and K.A. Gerhart Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 2004 1324 1335
7. A. Cieza, I. Kirchberger, and F. Biering-Sorensen ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context Spinal Cord 48 2010 305 312
8. I. Kirchberger, A. Cieza, and F. Biering-Sorensen ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the early post-acute context Spinal Cord 48 2010 297 304
9. F. Biering-Sorensen, M. Scheuringer, and M. Baumberger Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning Spinal Cord 44 2006 541 546
10. M.W. Post, M.W. Brinkhof, and E. von Elm Design of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Am J Phys Med Rehabil 90 11 Suppl 2 2011 S5 S16
11. R.J.A. Little, and D.B. Rubin Statistical analysis with missing data 2nd ed. 2002 Wiley Hoboken
12. C. Strobl, J. Malley, and G. Tutz An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests Psychol Methods 14 2009 323 348
13. G. Rasch An item analysis which takes individual differences into account Br J Math Stat Psychol 19 1966 49 57
14. M.L. Nering, and R. Ostini Handbook of polytomous item response theory models 2010 Routledge London
15. E.V. Smith Jr. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals J Appl Meas 3 2002 205 231
16. G. Raîche Critical eigenvalue sizes (variances) in standardized residual principal components analysis Rasch Measurement Transactions 19 2005 1012
17. W.C. Wang, and M. Wilson The Rasch testlet model Appl Psychol Meas 29 2005 126 149
18. C.A. McHorney, and A.R. Tarlov Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4 1995 293 307
19. A.B. Smith, R. Rush, L.J. Fallowfield, G. Velikova, and M. Sharpe Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data BMC Med Res Methodol 8 2008 33
20. J. Linacre What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions 16 2002 878
21. B.D. Wright, J.M. Linacre, J.E. Gustafson, and P. Martin-Löf Reasonable mean-square fit values Rasch Measurement Transactions 8 1994 370
22. J.C. Nunnally, and I.H. Bernstein Psychometric theory 3rd ed. 1994 McGraw-Hill New York
23. D. Andrich Rasch models for measurement 1988 Sage Newbury Park
24. A. Tennant, and P.G. Conaghan The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 57 2007 1358 1362
25. P. Mair, and R. Hatzinger Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R J Stat Softw 20 2007 1 20
26. D. Rizopoulos An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses J Stat Softw 17 2006 7 25
27. J.A. Teresi, M. Ramirez, J.S. Lai, and S. Silver Occurrences and sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in patient-reported outcome measures: description of DIF methods, and review of measures of depression, quality of life and general health Psychol Sci Q 50 2008 538
28. G. Whiteneck, and M.P. Dijkers Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 11 Suppl 2009 S22 S35