Fouling mechanisms of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with whey model solutions

Desalination

Volumn 360, Issue , 2015, Pages 87-96

  Corbatón Báguena, María osé ^a   Álvarez Blanco, Silvia ^a   Vincent Vela, María Cinta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fouling mechanisms; Mathematical models; Ultrafiltration; Whey model solutions

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; CERAMIC MEMBRANES; FOULING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; FOULING MECHANISMS; MODEL SOLUTION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; RESISTANCE-IN-SERIES MODEL; TOTAL PROTEIN CONTENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES; WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE;

MEMBRANES;

FOULING; MEMBRANE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROTEIN; SERUM; SOLUTION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

BOVINAE;

EID: 84921312337     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Nigam M.O., Bansal B., Chen X.D. Fouling and cleaning of whey protein concentrate fouled ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2008, 218:313-322.
2. Kazemimoghadam M., Mohammadi T. Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes in the milk industry. Desalination 2007, 204:213-218.
3. Argüello M.A., Álvarez S., Riera F.A., Álvarez R. Enzymatic cleaning of inorganic ultrafiltration membranes used for whey protein fractionation. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 216:121-134.
4. Wang C., Li Q., Tang H., Yan D., Zhou W., Xing J., Wan Y. Membrane fouling mechanism in ultrafiltration of succinic acid fermentation broth. Biores. Technol. 2012, 116:366-371.
5. Salahi A., Abbasi M., Mohammadi T. Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: experimental and modelling. Desalination 2010, 251:153-160.
6. Ruby Figueroa R.A., Cassano A., Drioli E. Ultrafiltration of orange press liquor: optimization for permeate flux and fouling index by response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80:1-10.
7. Tien C., Ramarao B.V. On analysis of cake formation and growth in cake filtration. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2006, 37:81-94.
8. Kim J., DiGiano F.A. Fouling models for low-pressure membrane systems. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 68:293-304.
9. Ho C.-C., Zydney L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 232:389-399.
10. Bhattacharya P.K., Agarwal S., De S., Rama Gopal U.V.S. Ultrafiltration of sugar cane juice for recovery of sugar: analysis of flux and retention. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 21:247-259.
11. Duclos-Orsello C., Li W., Ho C.-C. A three mechanism model to describe fouling of microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:856-866.
12. Peterson R., Geeting J., Daniel R. Estimation of ultrafilter performance based on characterization data. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2007, 30:1050-1054.
13. Yee K.W.K., Wiley D.E., Bao J. A unified model of the time dependence flux decline for the ultrafiltration of whey. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 332:69-80.
14. Baranyi J., Ross T., McMeekin T.A., Roberts T.A. Effects of parameterization on the performance of empirical models used in "predictive microbiology". Food Microbiol. 1996, 13:83-91.
15. Vincent Vela M.C., Álvarez Blanco S., Lora García J., Bergatiños Rodríguez E. Analysis of membrane pore blocking models adapted to crossflow ultrafiltration in the ultrafiltration of PEG. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149:232-241.
16. Mah S.-K., Chuah C.-K., Cathie Lee W.P., Cahi S.-P. Ultrafiltration of palm oil-oleic acid-glycerin solutions: fouling mechanism identification, fouling mechanism analysis and membrane characterizations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98:419-431.
17. Bhattacharjee C., Datta S. Analysis of polarized layer resistance during ultrafiltration of PEG-6000: an approach based on filtration theory. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 33:115-126.
18. Peng H., Tremblay A.Y. Membrane regeneration and filtration modeling in treating oily wastewaters. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:59-66.
19. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws - application to power-law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. IChemE 1982, 60:183-187.
20. Mohammadi T., Esmaeelifar A. Wastewater treatment of a vegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafiltration-activated carbon process. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 254:129-137.
21. Kaya Y., Gonder Z.B., Vergili I., Barlas H. The effect of transmembrane pressure and pH on treatment of paper machine process waters by using a two-step nanofiltration process. Desalination 2010, 250:150-157.
22. de la Casa E.J., Guadix A., Ibáñez R., Camacho F., Guadix E.M. A combined fouling model to describe the influence of the electrostatic environment on the cross-flow microfiltration of BSA. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:247-254.
23. Choi S.-W., Yoon J.-Y., Haam S., Jung J.-K., Kim J.-H., Kim W.-S. Modeling of the permeate flux during microfiltration of BSA-adsorbed microspheres in a stirred cell. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 228:270-278.
24. Carrère H., Blaszkow F., Roux de Balmann H. Modelling the clarification of lactic acid fermentation broths by cross-flow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 186:219-230.
25. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
26. de Barros S.T.D., Andrade C.M.G., Mendes E.S., Peres L. Study of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification by ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 215:213-224.
27. Jarusutthirak C., Mattaraj S., Jiraratananon R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287:138-145.
28. Smith P.K., Krohn R.I., Hermanson G.T., Mallia A.K., Gartner F.H., Provenzano M.D., Fujimoto E.K., Goeke N.M., Olson B.J., Klenk D.C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 150:76-85.
29. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
30. AOAC Official Method 930.30 Ash of Dried Milk, First Action 1930 1930.
31. Wang Y.-N., Tang C.Y. Protein fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes - the role of hydrodynamic conditions, solution chemistry and membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376:275-282.
32. Afonso A., Miranda J.M., Campos J.B.L.M. Numerical study of BSA ultrafiltration in the limiting flux regime - effect of variable physical properties. Desalination 2009, 249:1139-1150.
33. Almécija M.C., Martínez-Férez A., Guadix A., Páez M.P., Guadix E.M. Influence of the cleaning temperature on the permeability of ceramic membranes. Desalination 2009, 245:708-713.
34. Ang W.S., Elimelech M. Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 296:83-92.
35. Mo H., Tay K.G., Ng H.Y. Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 315:28-35.
36. Kawiecka-Skowron J., Majewska-Nowak K. Effect of dye content in a treated solution on performance of the UF ceramic membrane. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2011, 37:5-12.
37. Zhang Y., Cao C.-Y., Hou Q.-X., Feng W.-Y., Xu M., Su Z.-H., Lin Q.-Y., Zhuang J.-F., Lv W.-J. Using a membrane filtration process to concentrate the effluent from alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping plants. BioResources 2010, 5:780-795.
38. Kabsch-Korbutowicz M., Urbanowska A. Water treatment in integrated process using ceramic membranes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2010, 19:731-737.
39. Karagündüz A., Dizge N. Investigation of membrane biofouling in cross-flow ultrafiltration of biological suspension. J. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3:1-5.
40. Corbatón-Báguena M.J., Álvarez-Blanco S., Vincent-Vela M.C. Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA by means of saline solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 125:1-10.
41. Corbatón-Báguena M.J., Álvarez-Blanco S., Vincent-Vela M.C. Salt cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by whey model solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 132:226-233.
42. Matzinos P., Álvarez R. Effect of ionic strength on rinsing and alkaline cleaning of ultrafiltration inorganic membranes fouled with whey proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208:23-30.
43. Chung T.-S., Qin J.-J., Huan A., Toh K.-C. Visualization of the effect of die shear rate on the outer surface morphology of ultrafiltration membranes by AFM. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196:251-266.
44. Rahimpour A., Madaeni S.S. Improvement of performance and surface properties of nano-porous polyethersulfone (PES) membrane using hydrophilic monomers as additives in the casting solution. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:371-379.
45. 3 nanoparticles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 128:45-57.
46. Evans P.J., Bird M.R., Pihlajamäki A., Nyström M. The influence of hydrophobicity, roughness and charge upon ultrafiltration membranes for black tea liquor clarification. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:250-262.
47. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. Proteins 2003, vol. 1. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. 3rd ed. P.F. Fox, P.L.H. McSweeney (Eds.).
48. Mills O.E., Creamer L.K.A. Conformational change in bovine β-lactoglobulin at low pH. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1975, 379:618-626.
49. Brião V.B., Tavares C.R.G. Pore blocking mechanism for the recovery of milk solids from dairy wastewater by ultrafiltration. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2012, 29:393-407.