Content-specific evidence accumulation in inferior temporal cortex during perceptual decision-making

NeuroImage

Volumn 109, Issue , 2015, Pages 35-49

  Tremel, Joshua J ^a,b   Wheeler, Mark E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision time; Diffusion model; Evidence accumulation; FMRI; Perceptual decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE ACCUMULATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR TEMPORAL CORTEX; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTUAL DECISION MAKING; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; FACIAL RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME FACTOR; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACIAL RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REACTION TIME; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921308143     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.072     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bowman N.E., Kording K.P., Gottfried J.A. Temporal integration of olfactory perceptual evidence in human orbitofrontal cortex. Neuron 2012, 75:916-927.
2. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 2004, 33:261-304.
3. Carlson T., Grol M.J., Verstraten F.A. Dynamics of visual recognition revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage 2006, 32:892-905.
4. Cavanagh J.F., Wiecki T.V., Cohen M.X., Figueroa C.M., Samanta J., Sherman S.J., Frank M.J. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14:1462-1467.
5. Cisek P. Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: a computational model. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:9761-9770.
6. Cisek P., Puskas G.A., El-Murr S. Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:11560-11571.
7. Dale A.M. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 8:109-114.
8. Dale A.M., Buckner R.L. Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1997, 5:329-340.
9. Ditterich J. Stochastic models of decisions about motion direction: behavior and physiology. Neural Netw. 2006, 19:981-1012.
10. Ditterich J., Mazurek M.E., Shadlen M.N. Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:891-898.
11. Drugowitsch J., Moreno-Bote R., Churchland A.K., Shadlen M.N., Pouget A. The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:3612-3628.
12. Dunovan K.E., Tremel J.J., Wheeler M.E. Prior probability and feature predictability interactively bias perceptual decisions. Neuropsychologia 2014, 61:210-221.
13. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
14. Friston K.J., Tononi G., Reeke G.N., Sporns O., Edelman G.M. Value-dependent selection in the brain: simulation in a synthetic neural model. Neuroscience 1994, 59:229-243.
15. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vis. Res. 1997, 37:1673-1682.
16. Gluth S., Rieskamp J., Buchel C. Deciding when to decide: time-variant sequential sampling models explain the emergence of value-based decisions in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:10686-10698.
17. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:10-16.
18. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30.
19. Grinband J., Hirsch J., Ferrera V.P. A neural representation of categorization uncertainty in the human brain. Neuron 2006, 49:757-763.
20. Hanes D.P., Schall J.D. Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science (New York, N Y) 1996, 274:427-430.
21. Haxby J.V., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Maisog J.M., Pietrini P., Grady C.L. The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J. Neurosci. 1994, 14:6336-6353.
22. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Bandettini P.A., Ungerleider L.G. A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Nature 2004, 431.
23. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Ungerleider L.G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9.
24. Huettel S.A., Song A.W., McCarthy G. Decisions under uncertainty: probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:3304-3311.
25. Hwang E.J., Andersen R.A. Brain control of movement execution onset using local field potentials in posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:14363-14370.
26. James T.W., Humphrey G.K., Gati J.S., Menon R.S., Goodale M.A. The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:1017-1024.
27. Johnson J.S., Olshausen B.A. Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. J. Vis. 2003, 3:499-512.
28. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
29. Kayser A.S., Erickson D.T., Buchsbaum B.R., D'Esposito M. Neural representations of relevant and irrelevant features in perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:15778-15789.
30. Kim J.N., Shadlen M.N. Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:176-185.
31. Miezin F.M., Maccotta L., Ollinger J.M., Petersen S.E., Buckner R.L. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. NeuroImage 2000, 11:735-759.
32. Ojemann J.G., Akbudak E., Snyder A.Z., McKinstry R.C., Raichle M.E., Conturo T.E. Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. NeuroImage 1997, 6:156-167.
33. Ollinger J.M., Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. NeuroImage 2001, 13:218-229.
34. Peirce J.W. PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. J. Neurosci. Methods 2007, 162:8-13.
35. Peirce J.W. Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front. Neuroinform. 2008, 2:10.
36. Philiastides M.G., Sajda P. Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:509-518.
37. Philiastides M.G., Sajda P. EEG-informed fMRI reveals spatiotemporal characteristics of perceptual decision making. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:13082-13091.
38. Ploran E.J., Nelson S.M., Velanova K., Donaldson D.I., Petersen S.E., Wheeler M.E. Evidence Accumulation and the Moment of Recognition: Dissociating Perceptual Recognition Processes Using fMRI. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27.
39. Ploran E.J., Tremel J.J., Nelson S.M., Wheeler M.E. High quality but limited quantity perceptual evidence produces neural accumulation in frontal and parietal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:2650-2662.
40. Ratcliff R. A Theory of Memory Retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 1978, 85.
41. Ratcliff R. A Comparison of Macaque Behavior and Superior Colliculus Neuronal Activity to Predictions From Models of Two-Choice Decisions. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90.
42. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 2008, 20:873-922.
43. Ratcliff R., Cherian A., Segraves M. A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:1392-1407.
44. Ratcliff R., Hasegawa Y.T., Hasegawa R.P., Smith P.L., Segraves M.A. Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:1756-1774.
45. Ratcliff R., Philiastides M.G., Sajda P. Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:6539-6544.
46. Reddi B.A., Carpenter R.H. The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:827-830.
47. Roitman J.D., Shadlen M.N. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:9475-9489.
48. Rorie A.E., Gao J., McClelland J.L., Newsome W.T. Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the macaque monkey. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9308.
49. Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 86:1916-1936.
50. Simen P. Evidence Accumulator or Decision Threshold - Which Cortical Mechanism are We Observing?. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:183.
51. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:161-168.
52. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 116:283-317.
53. Snyder A.Z. Difference image versus ratio image error function forms in PET-PET realignment. Quantification of brain function using PET 1996, Academic, San Diego. D. Bailey, T. Jones (Eds.).
54. Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N.G., Carlin B.R., van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat Methodol. 2002, 64:583-616.
55. Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N.G., Carlin B.P., van der Linde A. The deviance information criterion: 12years on. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat Methodol. 2014, 76:485-493.
56. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging 1988, Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, New York.
57. Thura D., Beauregard-Racine J., Fradet C.W., Cisek P. Decision making by urgency gating: theory and experimental support. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:2912-2930.
58. Tosoni A., Galati G., Romani G.L., Corbetta M. Sensory-motor mechanisms in human parietal cortex underlie arbitrary visual decisions. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1446-1453.
59. Townsend J.T., Fific M. Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory. Percept. Psychophys. 2004, 66:953-962.
60. Townsend J.T., Wenger M.J. The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2004, 11:391-418.
61. Usher M., McClelland J.L. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:550-592.
62. van Vugt M.K., Simen P., Nystrom L.E., Holmes P., Cohen J.D. EEG oscillations reveal neural correlates of evidence accumulation. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6:106.
63. Wheeler M.E., Petersen S.E., Nelson S.M., Ploran E.J., Velanova K. Dissociating early and late error signals in perceptual recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:2211-2225.
64. Wiecki T.V., Sofer I., Frank M.J. HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Python. Front. Neuroinform. 2013, 7:14.
65. Zhang J., Rowe J.B. Dissociable mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff during visual perceptual learning are revealed by a hierarchical drift-diffusion model. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8:69.