Definition of landscape character areas and types in Side region, Antalya-Turkey with regard to land use planning

Land Use Policy

Volumn 44, Issue , 2015, Pages 90-100

  Atik, Meryem ^a   Işikli, Rabia Canay ^a   Ortaçeşme, Veli ^a   Yildirim, Emrah ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Antalya Side; Land use planning in Turkey; Landscape; Landscape character assessment (LCA)

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LEGISLATION; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; POLICY APPROACH; SPATIAL PLANNING;

ANTALYA [TURKEY]; MEDITERRANEAN REGION; TURKEY;

EID: 84921308128     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Atik M., Işikli R.C., Erdoğan R. Kültürel Peyzajlar ve Tanimlanmasindaki Farkli Yaklaşimlar. YAPI Mimarlik Tasarim Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi 2009, 331:98-102.
2. Atik M., Işikli R.C., Yildirim E. Kentsel ve Kirsal Peyzajlarin Tanimlanmasinda Peyzaj Karakter Analizi Yöntem Yaklaşimi. Peyzaj Mimarliği 4 2010, 509-519. Bildiriler kitabi, Selçuk-Izmir, Turkey.
3. Atik M., Ortaçeşme V. Peyzaj Karakter Analizi Yöntemi ile Antalya Side Bölgesi Kültürel Peyzajlarinin Karakter Analizi. TÜBITAK Araştirma Projesi 108Y345 2010, 96.
4. Brabyn L. Solutions for characterizing natural landscapes in New Zealand using geographical information systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 76:23-34.
5. Brabyn L. Classifying landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34(3):299-321.
6. Brown G., Brabyn L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107(3):317-331.
7. Caspersen O.H. Public participation in strengthening cultural heritage: the role of landscape character assessment in Denmark. Geogr. Tidsskr. - Dan. J. Geogr. 2009, 109(1):33-45.
8. Council of Europe The European Landscape Convention (STE no. 176) 2000, Available from: http://www.coe.int (accessed 06.04.10).
9. Çepel N. Ekoloji Terimleri Sözlüğü, I.Ü. Yayin No: 3048, O.F. Yayin No: 324 1990, 356. Istanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayinlari, Istanbul.
10. European Commission Natura 2000 in the Mediterranean Region 2009, European Commission Environment Directorate General, Available from: http://ec.europa.eu (accessed 11.06.13).
11. Fagerholm N., Käyhkö N., Van Eetvelde V. Landscape characterization integrating expert and local spatial knowledge of land and forest resources. Environ. Manag. 2013, 52:660-682.
12. Farina A. Landscape Ecology in Action 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
13. Groot J.C.J., Jellema A., Rossing A.H. Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 32:112-119.
14. Harita Genel Komutanliği Türkiye 1/250.000 ölçekli Topoğrafik Haritalari, No NJ 36-13 1995.
15. Heritage Council Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) in Ireland: Baseline Audit and Evaluation. Final Report to the Heritage Council 2006, Heritage Council, Kilkenny, Ireland.
16. Höchtl F., Terkenli T., Plieninger T. Editorial: the European Mediterranean region in the focus of landscape research. Die Erde 2007, 138(1):1-6.
17. Işikli R.C. Antalya Side Bölgesi Kültürel Peyzajlarinin "Peyzaj Karakter Analizi" Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi 2010, 167. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Akdeniz Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarliği Anabilim Dali, Antalya, Türkiye.
18. James P., Gittins J.W. Local landscape character assessment: an evaluation of community-led schemes in Cheshire. Landsc. Res. 2007, 32(4):423-442.
19. Jellema A., Stobbelaar D.J., Groot J.C.J., Rossing W.A.H. Landscape character assessment using region growing techniques in geographical information systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:S161-S174.
20. Jessel B. Elements, characteristics and character - information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2006, 6:153-167.
21. Kim K., Pauleit S. Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: the case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(1):264-274.
22. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Jeoloji Haritalari, Antalya-M10-M11, L10, L11 Paftalari 1997.
23. Manavoğlu E. Şehir ve Bölge Planlama 2012, 159. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Peyzaj Mimarliği Bölümü Ders Kitabi.
24. Mansel A.M. Side Kilavuzu TC Milli Egitim Bakanligi Eski Eserler ve Muzeler Genel Mudurlugu Yayinlarindan Seri 1, Sayi 21 1967, Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, Ankara.
25. Peker Say N., Çolakkadioğlu D., Özyurt S. Sea of Urban Development Plans in Türkiye. IAIA10 Conference Proceedings: The Role of Impact Assessment in Transitioning to the Green Economy, 30th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment 2010, 6.
26. Planning Department Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong - Technical Report 2. Technical Report by the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China 2008, Available from: http://www.pland.gov.hk (accessed 11.06.13).
27. Resmi Gazete Imar Kanunu. Kanun Numarasi 3194, Tertip: 5 (24), 378, 18749 Sayi ve 5/9/1985 tarihli Resmi Gazete 1985.
28. Spirn A.W. The language of landscape. 2002. Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader 1998, 265. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. S. Swaffield (Ed.).
29. Stephenson J., Bauchop H., Petchey P. Bannockburn Heritage Landscape Study. Science for Conservation 244 2004, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand, Available from: http://www.doc.govt.nz (accessed 02.11.11).
30. Swaffield S.R. Landscape as a way of knowing the world. The Cultured Landscape: Designing the Environment in the 21st Century 2005, 3-24. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. S. Harvey, K. Fieldhouse (Eds.).
31. Swanwick C. Landscape Character Assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland 2002, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham/Scottish National Heritage, Edinburgh.
32. Swanwick C. The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: an overview. Countryside Planning: New Approaches to Management and Conservation 2004, 109-124. Earthscan, London. K. Bishop, A. Phillips (Eds.).
33. Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 265:562-575.
34. Taylor K. Cultural landscapes and Asia: reconciling international and Southeast Asian regional values. Landsc. Res. 2009, 34(1):7-31.
35. Tarim ve Köy Işleri Bakanliği Antalya Ili Büyük Toprak Gruplari ve Toprak Yetenek Siniflari Haritasi 1993.
36. Turner S.C. Devon Historic Landscape Characterisation 2005, Devon County Council Historic Environment Service/English Heritage, Exeter.
37. TDK Türk Dil Kurumu Türkçe Sözlük 2005, 2243. Türk Dil Kurumu 4. Akşam Sanat Okulu Matbaasi, Ankara.
38. Van Eetvelde V., Antrop M. A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91:160-170.
39. Vogiatzakis I.N., Griffiths G.H., Melis M.T., Marini A., Careddu M.B. Landscape typology in the Mediterranean context: a tool for habitat restoration. J. Mediterr. Ecol. 2006, 7(1-4):23-30.
40. Wascher D.M. European Landscape Character Areas. Typologies, Cartography and Indicators for the Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes 2005, Landscape Europe, Oxford.
41. Wascher D.M. Landscape Character Assessment - Steps towards Sustainable Development. Panel: 'Sürdürülebilir Alan Kullanim Planlanmasi ve Tasarimi için Temel Olan Peyzaj Karakter Analizi ve Değerlendirmesi' 2009, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara.
42. Will H. Cultural landscape history - possibilities for protection, participating institutions, and investigation methods in England. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 2005, 37(11):336-341.
43. Yavuz A., Feraşet I., Aydin T. Coğrafi Terimler Sözlüğü Bitirme Tezi 2009, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü, Available from: http://www.cografya.sakarya.edu.tr/cts.php (accessed 10.06.10).
44. Yilmaz K.T. Incorporating vegetation analysis into ecological characterization of landscapes: the Turkish case. Fitosociologia 2011, 48(2):83-92.
45. Yücel M., Aslanboğa I., Korkut A. Peyzaj Mimarliği Terimleri Sözlüğü, Yayin No: 2008/4 2008, TMMOB Peyzaj Mimarlari Odasi, Ankara.