Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions

Omega (United Kingdom)

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 201-212

  Schmitt, Amanda J ^a   Sun, Siyuan Anthony ^b   Snyder, Lawrence V ^c   Shen, Zuo Jun Max ^b  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH   (United States)

^c Lehigh University   (United States)

Author keywords

Inventory control; Risk; Supply chain disruptions

Indexed keywords

COSTS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SUPPLY CHAINS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

CENTRALISATION; COST VARIANCE; DECENTRALISATION; DECENTRALISED; DETERMINISTICS; INVENTORY SYSTEMS; RISK DIVERSIFICATION; RISK POOLING; STOCHASTICS; SUPPLY-CHAIN DISRUPTIONS;

INVENTORY CONTROL;

EID: 84921279023     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alptekinoglu A., Banerjee A., Paul A., Jain N. Inventory pooling to deliver differentiated service. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2013, 15(1):33-44.
2. Atan Z, Snyder LV. Inventory strategie stomanage supply disruptions. In: Supply chain disruptions. Springer; 2012. p. 115-39.
3. Axsäter S Inventory control 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. 1st ed.
4. Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR, Yang ZB. Decentralized supply Risk management. In: Handbook of integrated risk management in globals Upply chains. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 389-424.
5. Babich V., Burnetas A.N, Ritchken P.H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufactur- ing & Service Operations Management 2007, 9(2):123-146.
6. Berk E., Arreola-Risa A. Note on "future supply uncertainty in EOQ models". Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 1994, 41(1):129-132.
7. Berman O., Krass D., Mahdi T.M. On the benefits of risk pooling in inventory management. Production and Operations Management 2011, 20(1):57-71.
8. Chen X., Sim M., Simchi-Levi D., Sun P. Risk aversionin inventory management. Operations Research 2007, 55(5):828-842.
9. Chopra S, Reinhardt G, Mohan U. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risk sina supply chain. Naval Research Logistics 2007, 54(5):544-555.
10. Corbett C.J, Rajaram K. Ageneralization of the inventory pooling effect to nonnormal dependent demand. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2006, 8(4):351-358.
11. Dada M, Petruzzi N, Schwarz L. A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2007, 9(1):9-32.
12. Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C, Schlesinger H. The risk-averse (andprudent) newsboy. Management Science 1995, 41(5):786-794.
13. Ellis SC, Shockley J, Henry RM. Making sense of supply disruption risk research: a conceptual frame work grounded in enactment theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2011, 47(2):65-96.
14. Eppen GD. Note: effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location news boy problem. Management Science 1979, 25(5):498-501.
15. Hopp WJ, Liu Z. Protecting supply chain networks against catastrophic failures. Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston,IL; 2006.
16. Parlar M, Berkin D. Future supply un certainty in EOQ models. Naval Research Logistics (NRL) 1991, 38(1):107-121.
17. Paterson C, Kiesmüller G, Teunter R, Glazebrook K. Inventory models with lateral transshipments: areview. European Journal of Opera- tional Research 2011, 210(2):125-136.
18. Qi L. Acontinuous - review inventory model with random disruptions at the primary supplier. European Journal of Operational Research 2013, 225(1):59-74.
19. Sawik T. Selection of supply portfolio under disruptionrisks. Omega 2011, 39(2):194-208.
20. Sawik T. Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 2013, 41(2):259-269.
21. Schmitt AJ, Snyder LV. In finite-horizon models for inventory controlunder yield uncertainty and disruptions. Computers and Operations Research 2012, 39:850-862.
22. Schmitt AJ, Snyder LV Shen ZJM. Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: properties and approximations. European Journal of Operational Research 2010, 206(2):313-328.
23. Snyder LV. A tight approximation for acontinuous-review inventory model with supplier disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, forthcoming.
24. Snyder LV, Tomlin B. Inventory management with advanced warning of disruptions. Working paper, Bethlehem, PA: P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University; 2008.
25. Lawrence VS, Zuo-Jun MS. Supply and demand uncertainty in multi-echelon supply chains.Working Paper 2006, Lehigh University.
26. Snyder LV, Max SZ-J Fundamentals of supply chain theory 2011, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
27. Snyder LV, Atan Z, Peng P, Rong Y, Schmitt AJ, Sinsoysal B. OR/M Smodels for supply chain disruptions: areview. SSRN eLibrary 2010.
28. Tang SY, Kouvelis P. Supplier diversification strategies in the presence of yield uncertainty and buyer competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2011, 13(4):439-451.
29. Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science 2006, 52(5):639-657.
30. Tomlin B. Disruption-management strategies for short life-cycleproducts. Naval Research Logistics 2009, 56:318-347.
31. Tomlin B, Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dul sourcing in unreliable news vendor networks. Manufacturing & Service Operations Man- agement 2005, 7(1):37-57.
32. Van Meighem JA. Risk mitigation in news vendor networks: resource diversi- fication, flexibility, sharing and hedging. Management Science 2007, 53(8):1269-1288.
33. Wang Y, Gilland W, Tomlin B. Mitigating supply risk: dual sourcing or process improvement?. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2010, 12(3):489-510.
34. Yang H, Schrage L. Conditions that cause risk pooling to increase inventory. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192(3):837-851.
35. Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR. Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Science 2009, 55(2):192-209.
36. Yang BZ, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR. Using a dual- sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing & Service Opera- tions Management 2012, 14(2):202-217.
37. Yano CA, Lee HL. Lot sizing with random yields: areview. Operations Research 1995, 43(2):311-334.
38. Yu H, Zeng A Z, Zhao L. Single or dual sourcing: decision- making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. Omega 2009, 37(4):788-800.
39. Zipkin PH. Foundations of inventory management 2000, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, MA. 1st ed.