Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations

New Media and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 24-40

  Chen, Gina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

Affiliation; blogging; Facebook; gender; need theory; self disclosure; social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921271647     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444813504269     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bane CMH,Cornish M,Erspamer N, et al.Self-disclosure through weblogs and perceptions of online and “real-life” friendship among female bloggers.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2010;13:131-139
2. Baumeister RF,Leary MR.The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human need.Psychological Bulletin. 1995;117 (3): 497-529
3. Bimber B.Measuring the gender gap on the Internet.Social Science Quarterly. 2000;81 (3): 1-11
4. BlogHer (2012) Women and social media in 2012. Available at: http://www.blogher.com/files/2012socialmediafinalv2-120314103327-phpapp02.pdf
5. Bonds-Raacke J,Raacke J.MySpace and Facebook: identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites.Individual Differences Research. 2010;8 (1): 27-33
6. boyd d,Ellison NB.Social networking sites: definition, history, and scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;13 (1): 210-230
7. boyd d,Golder S,Lotan G.Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter.Presented at the proceedings of the HICSS-43 IEEE; 2010Kauai, HI; 2010.
8. BrennerJ (2012) Pew Internet: social networking (full detail). 13November. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx
9. Cattell RB.The scree test of the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1966;1 (2): 245-276
10. Chen GM.Tweet this: a uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others.Computers in Human Behavior. 2011;27:755-762
11. Chen GM.Why do women write personal blogs? Satisfying needs for self-disclosure and affiliation tell part of the story.Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28:171-180
12. Chen GM.Don’t call me that: a techno-feminist critique of the term mommy blogger.Mass Communication and Society. 2013;16 (4): 510-532
13. Christofides E,Muise A,Desmarais S.Information disclosure and control on Facebook: are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes?.CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009;12 (3): 341-345
14. Women & Everyday Uses of the Internet: Agency & Identity. Consalvo MPaasonen S, ed. New York: Peter Lang Publishing; 2002:
15. Detenber BH,Wijaya M,Goh H.Blogging and online friendships: the role of self-disclosure and perceived reciprocity.Paper presented to the Communication and Technology Division of the International Communication Association; 2008Montreal, QC, Canada; 2008.
16. eBizMBA.com (2010) Top 20 most popular social networking websites. 30January. Available at: http://ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites
17. Granovetter MS.The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78 (6): 1360-1380
18. Gruzd A,Wellman B,Takhteyev Y.Imaging Twitter as an imagined community.American Behavioral Scientist. 2011;55 (10): 1294-1318
19. HamptonKNGouletLSRainieL. (2011) Social networking sites and our lives. 16June. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx
20. Herring SCCyberReader. Vitanza V, ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1996:144-154.
21. Herring SC,Johnson DA,DiBenedetto TLanguage and Gender: A Reader. Coates J, ed. Oxford: Blackwell, pp; 1998:197-210.
22. HerringSCKouperIScheidtLAWrightE (2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. In: GurakLAntonijevicSJohnsonLRatcliffCReymanJ (eds.) Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community and culture weblogs. Retrieved from blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/women_and_children.html
23. Hill CA.Affiliation motivation: people who need people … but in different ways.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;52 (5): 1008-1018
24. Hughes DJ,Rowe M,Batey M, et al.A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality of predictors of social media use.Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28:561-569
25. Java A,Finin T,Song X, et al.Why we Twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities.Paper presented at the Joint WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD workshop’07; 2007San Jose, CA; 2007.
26. JesellaK (2008) Blogging’s glass ceiling. The New York Times, 27July. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/fashion/27blogher.html
27. Johnson PR,Yang S.Uses and gratification of Twitter: an examination of user motives and satisfaction of Twitter use.Paper presented to the Communication Technology Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication; 2009Boston, MA; 2009.
28. Kim JH,Kim M,Nam Y.An analysis of self-construals, motivations, Facebook use, and user satisfaction.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2010;26 (11–12): 1077-1099
29. Ko H,Kuo F.Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure?.CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009;12 (1): 75-79
30. Ledbetter AM,Mazer JP,DeGroot JM, et al.Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness.Communication Research. 2011;38 (1): 27-53
31. LenhartAPurcellKSmithA. (2012) Social media & movie Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://pewresearch.org
32. Li D,Walejko G.Splogs and abandoned blogs: the periods of sampling bloggers and blogs.Information, Communication, & Society. 2008;11 (2): 279-296
33. Li Y,Lin G.Exploring the extrinsic and intrinsic motivations in blogging: results of a survey of Hong Kong University.China Media Research. 2012;8 (1): 54-63
34. Liao H,Liu S,Pi S.Modeling motivations for blogging: an expectancy theory analysis.Social Behavior and Personality. 2011;39 (2): 251-264
35. Marwick AE,boyd d.I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse and the imagined audience.New Media & Society. 2010;13 (1): 114-133
36. Maslow AHMotivations and Personality. (1987) Motivations and Personality. 3rd ed.New York: Harper & Row.New York: Harper & Row; 1987:
37. Nardi BA,Schiano DJ,Gumbrecht M, et al.Why we blog.Communications of the ACM. 2004;47 (2): 41-46
38. Pedersen S,Macafee C.Gender differences in British blogging.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;12:1472-1492
39. Punyanunt-Carter NM.An analysis of college students’ self-disclosure behaviors on the Internet.College Student Journal. 2006;40 (2): 329-331
40. Ridings CM,Gefen D.Virtual community attraction: why people hang out online.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2004;10 (1):
41. Rui H,Whinston A.Information or attention? An empirical study of user contribution to Twitter.Information Systems and e-Business Management. 2010;10 (3): 309-324
42. Ryan RM,Deci ELHandbook of Personality: Theory and Research. John OPRobbins RWPervin LA, ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008:654-678.
43. Tabachnick BG,Fidell LSUsing Multivariate Statistics. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed.New York: Pearson.New York: Pearson; 2007:
44. Thelwall M.Social networks, gender, and friending: an analysis of MySpace member profiles.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008;59 (8): 1321-1330
45. Utz S,Tanis M,Vermeulen I.It is all about being popular: the effects of need for popularity on social network site use.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012;15 (1): 37-42
46. Wackwitz LA,Rakow LFWomen in Communication. (2007) Got theory? In: CreedonPJCramerJ (eds) Women in Communication. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 257–271.Creedon PJCramer J, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:257-271.
47. Wheeless LR.A follow-up student of the relationship among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity.Human Communication Research. 1978;4 (2): 143-157
48. Zappavigna M.Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter.New Media & Society. 2011;13 (5): 788-806