The Moral Evil Demons

Disagreement

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wedgwood, Ralph ^a  

^a MERTON COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intuitions; Moral disagreement; Moral relativism; Rationality; Self trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921258569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.003.0010     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Boyd, Richard (1988). "How to Be a Moral Realist," in Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 181-228.
2. Christensen, David (2007). "Epistemology of Disagreement: the Good News," Philosophical Review, 116: 187-217.
3. Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Elga, Adam (2007). "Reflection and Disagreement," Noûs, 41/3: 478-502.
5. Feldman, Richard (2006). "Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement," in Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 216-36.
6. Frances, Bryan (2008). "Live Skeptical Hypotheses," in John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 225-45.
7. Fricker, Elizabeth (1995). "Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony," Mind, 104: 393-411.
8. Gibbard, Allan (1990). Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Harman, Gilbert, and Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1995). Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Jeffrey, Richard (1983). The Logic of Decision., 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Jones, Karen (1999). "Second-Hand Moral Knowledge," Journal of Philosophy, 96/2: 55-78.
12. Kalderon, Mark (2005). Moral Fictionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Kelly, Thomas (2005). "The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement," in John Hawthorne and Tamar Gendler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, i. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167-96.
14. Lehrer, Keith (1976). "When Rational Disagreement is Impossible," Noûs, 10: 327-32.
15. Miller, Richard W. (1992). Moral Differences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Pettit, Philip (2006). "When to Defer to Majority Testimony-and When Not," Analysis, 66: 179-87.
17. Plantinga, Alvin (2000). "Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism," in Philip L. Quinn and Kevin Meeker (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 172-92.
18. Reid, Thomas (1764). An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh: Kincaid and Bell.
19. Rosen, Gideon (2001). "Nominalism, Naturalism, Epistemic Relativism," Philosophical Perspectives, 15: 69-91.
20. Sidgwick, Henry (1907). The Methods of Ethics, 7th edn. London: Macmillan.
21. Sidgwick, Henry (2000). Essays on Ethics and Method, ed. Marcus G. Singer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Van Inwagen, Peter (1996). "It is Wrong, Everywhere, Always, and for Anyone, to Believe Anything upon Insufficient Evidence," in Jeff Jordan and Daniel Howard-Snyder (eds.), Faith, Freedom and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 137-53.
23. Weatherson, Brian (2007). "Disagreeing about Disagreement." TS, January. .
24. Wedgwood, Ralph (2002a). "The Aim of Belief," Philosophical Perspectives, 16: 267-97.
25. Wedgwood, Ralph (2002b). "Internalism Explained," Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65: 349-69.
26. Wedgwood, Ralph (2006). "The Internal and External Components of Cognition," in Robert Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Oxford: Blackwell, 307-25.
27. Wedgwood, Ralph (2007). The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Williamson, Timothy (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Wright, Crispin (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.