Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 937-949

  Park, No Wook ^a  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Landslide; Maximum entropy; Prediction; Validation

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; ENTROPY; FORECASTING; LANDSLIDES; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; MAPPING; MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING; MAXIMUM ENTROPY MODELING; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING; VALIDATION;

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;

EID: 84921068719     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3442-z     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106
2. Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 44:120–135
3. Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998) Generalised linear modeling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci 24:373–385
4. Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modeling. Ecol Model 157:101–118
5. Ballabio C, Sterlacchini S (2012) Support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: the Staffora river basin case study, Italy. Math Geosci 44:47–70
6. Carranza EJM, Hale M (2003) Evidential belief functions for data-driven geologically constrained mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Ore Geol Rev 22:117–132
7. Chae BG, Cho YC, Song YS, Kim KS, Lee CO, Lee BJ, Kim MI (2009) Development of landslide prediction technology and damage mitigation countermeasures. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Korea (in Korean)
8. Choi J, Oh HJ, Won JS, Lee S (2010) Validation of an artificial neural network model for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Earth Sci 60:473–483
9. Chung CF, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65:1389–1399
10. Chung CF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472
11. Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42:213–228
12. Elith J, Graham CH (2009) Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for different performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32:1–12
13. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderon RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151
14. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of Maxent for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57
15. Ercanoglue M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730
16. Felicísimo A, Cuartero A, Remondo J, Quiros E (2012) Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides 9:175–189
17. Franklin J (2009) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New York
18. Ghosh S, Carranza EJM (2010) Spatial analysis of mutual fault/fracture and slope controls on rock sliding in Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Geomorphology 122:1–24
19. Greco R, Sorriso-Valvo M, Catalano E (2007) Logistic regression analysis in the evaluation of mass movements susceptibility: the Aspromonte case study, Calabria, Italy. Eng Geol 89:47–66
20. Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100
21. Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106:620–630
22. Kim OJ, Lee DS, Lee HY (1977) Explanatory text of the geological map of Boeun sheet. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Korea (in Korean)
23. Kim KS, Kim WY, Chae BG, Cho YC (2000) Engineering geologic characteristics of landslide induced by rainfall -Boeun, Chungcheong Buk-Do-. J Eng Geol 10:163–174 (in Korean)
24. Kim KD, Lee S, Oh HJ, Choi JK, Won JS (2006) Assessment of ground subsidence hazard near an abandoned underground coal mine using GIS. Environ Geol 50:1183–1191
25. Leathwick JR, Elith J, Francis MP, Hastie T, Taylor P (2006) Variation in demersal fish species richness in the oceans surrounding New Zealand: an analysis using boosted regression trees. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 321:267–281
26. Lee S (2005) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26:1477–1491
27. Lee S (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network in the Gangneung area, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 28:4763–4783
28. Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113
29. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50:847–855
30. Lee S, Choi J, Min K (2004) Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing at Boun, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 25:2037–2052
31. Lee S, Hwang J, Park I (2012) Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to landslide susceptibility mapping in Jinbu, Korea. Catena 100:15–30
32. Lehmann A, Overton JM, Leathwick JR (2002) GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecol Model 157:189–207
33. Park NW (2011) Application of Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence to GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Earth Sci 62:367–376
34. Park NW, Chi KH, Chung CF, Kwon BD (2003) GIS-based data-driven geological data integration using fuzzy logic: theory and application. Econ Environ Geol 36:243–255 (in Korean)
35. Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175
36. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259
37. Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, Leathwick J, Ferrier S (2009) Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol Appl 19:181–197
38. Pineda E, Lobo JM (2009) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. J Anim Ecol 78:182–190
39. Porwal AK, Carranza EJM, Hale M (2004) A hybrid neuro-fuzzy model for mineral potential mapping. Math Geol 36:803–826
40. Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Liaw A (2006) Newer classification and regression tree technique: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9:181–199
41. Sivia DS, Skilling J (2006) Data analysis: a Bayesian tutorial. Oxford University Press, New York
42. Tinoco BA, Astudillo PX, Latta SC, Graham CH (2009) Distribution, ecology and conservation of an endangered Andean hummingbird: the Violet-throated Metaltail (Metallura baroni). Bird Conserv Int 19:63–76
43. Van Der Wal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, Williams SE (2009) Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Model 220:589–594
44. Vorpahl P, Elsenbeer H, Märker M, Schröder B (2012) How can statistical models help to determine driving factors on landslides? Ecol Model 239:27–39
45. Ward DF (2007) Modelling the potential geographic distribution of invasive ant species in New Zealand. Biol Invasions 9:723–735
46. Wollan AK, Bakkestuen Y, Kauserud H, Gulden G, Halvorsen R (2008) Modelling and predicting fingal distribution patterns using herbarium data. J Biogeogr 35:2298–2310
47. Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 101:572–582