Governing GMOs: The (counter) movement for mandatory and voluntary Non-GMO labels

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 9456-9476

  Bain, Carmen ^a   Dandachi, Tamera ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Food retailers; GMO labels; Governance; Political consumerism; Social movements; Transparency

Indexed keywords

AGROINDUSTRY; FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION; FOOD INDUSTRY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; RETAILING; SOCIAL MOVEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84921058813     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6129456     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. The term GMO (genetically modified organism) has become the common signification for genetically engineered (GE) foods. Although the terms are not technically the same, they will be used interchangeably in this paper to express the growing movement against corporate agriculture and the use of genetic engineering within agriculture.
2. Tracy, T. GMO labeling faces ballot test in Oregon, Colorado. Available online: http://online.wsj.com/articles/gmo-labeling-faces-ballot-test-in-oregon-colorado-1414961328 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
3. In addition, there was a ballot initiative in Oregon in 2002 (Measure 27) to mandate GM labels, which was defeated. In 2005, Alaska had passed a law that would mandate labeling of GM fish sold in the state. However, GM fish have yet to be approved by the FDA.
4. Kaste, M. So what happens if the movement to label GMOs succeeds. NPR: 2013. Available online: http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/10/16/235525984/so-what-happens-if-the-movement-tolabel-gmos-succeeds (accessed on 10 November 2014).
5. National Academy of Sciences. Webcast archive: First meeting. Available online: http://nas-sites.org/ge-crops/2014/09/24/webcast-archive-first-meeting/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
6. Price, J. National Academy of Sciences. Available online: http://gmoanswers.com/studies/top-10-consumer-questions (accessed on 10 November 2014).
7. Schurman, R.; Munro, W. Fighting for the Future of Food; University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2010.
8. Wohlers, A.E. Regulating genetically modified food. Polit. Life Sci. 2010, 29, 17-39.
9. Caswell, J. Labeling policy for GMOs: To each his own? AgBioForum 2000, 3, 53-57.
10. Eenennaam, A.; Chassy, B.; Kalaitzandonakes, N.; Redick, T. The potential impacts of mandatory labeling for genetically engineered food in the United States. Available online: http://www.castscience.org/file.cfm/media/products/digitalproducts/CAST_Issue_Paper_54_web_ optimized_29B2AB16AD687.pdf (accessed on 4 December 2014).
11. Klintman, M. Arguments surrounding organic and genetically modified food labelling: A few comparisons. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2002, 4, 247-259.
12. Sand, P.H. Labelling genetically modified food: The right to know. Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law 2006, 15, 185-192.
13. Wohlers, A.E. Labeling of genetically modified food. Polit. Life Sci. 2013, 32, 73-84.
14. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CPI). Straight Talk on Genetically Engineered Foods; CPI: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
15. Fernandez-Cornejo, J.; Wechsler, S.J.; Livingston, M.; Mitchell, L. Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. Available online: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economicresearch-report/err162.aspx (accessed on 4 December 2014).
16. Gasparro, A. The GMO fight ripples down the food chain. Available online: http://online.wsj.com/articles/the-gmo-fight-ripples-down-the-food-chain-1407465378 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
17. Boström, M.; Klintman, M. Eco-Standards, Product Labelling and Green Consumerism; Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, UK, 2008.
18. Roff, R. Shopping for change? Neoliberalizing activism and the limits to eating non-GMO. Agric. Hum. Values 2007, 24, 511-522.
19. Busch, L. The private governance of food: Equitable exchange or bizarre bazaar? Agric. Hum. Values 2011, 28, 345-352.
20. Raynolds, L.T.; Long, M.A.; Murray, D.L. Regulating corporate responsibility in the American market: A comparative analysis of voluntary certifications. Compet. Chang. 2014, 18, 91-110.
21. Bain, C.; Ransom, E.; Higgins, V. Private agri-food standards: Contestation, hybridity and the politics of standards. Int. J. Food Agric. 2013, 20, 1-10.
22. Fuchs, D.; Kalfagianni, A. Private Food Governance and Implications for Social Sustainability and Democratic Legitimacy. In Corporate Social Responsibility and Regulatory Governance; Utting, P., Marques, J.C., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, UK, 2010; pp. 225-247.
23. Henson, S. Private agrifood governance: Conclusions, observations and provocations. Agric. Hum. Values 2011, 28, 443-451.
24. Consumers Union. Mission. Available online: https://consumersunion.org/about/mission/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
25. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. About IATP. Available online: http://www.iatp.org/about (accessed on 10 November 2014).
26. Organic Consumers Union. Millions against Monsanto. Available online: http://www.organicconsumers.org/monsanto/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
27. DeLind, L.B. Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agric. Hum. Values 2011, 28, 273-283.
28. Hatanaka, M.; Bain, C.; Busch, L. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy 2005, 30, 354-369.
29. Flora, C.; Bain, C.; Call, C. Sustainability standards and their implications for agroecology. In Integrating Agriculture, Conservation, and Ecotourism: Societal Influences; Campbell, B., Lopez Ortiz, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 163-225.
30. Bartley, T.; Child, C. Shaming the corporation the social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2014, 79, 653-679.
31. Busch, L.; Bain, C. New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociol. 2004, 69, 321-346.
32. Giovannucci, D.; Ponte, S. Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy 2005, 30, 284-301.
33. Henson, S.; Reardon, T. Private agri-food standards: Implications for food policy and the agri-food system. Food Policy 2005, 30, 241-253.
34. Chkanikova, O.; Lehner, M. Private eco-brands and green market development: Towards new forms of sustainability governance in food retailing. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.055.
35. Allaire, G. Applying economic sociology to understand the meaning of "quality" in food markets. Agric. Econ. 2010, 41, 167-180.
36. Loureiro, M.L.; Hine, S. Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic, and GMO-free products. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2002, 34, 477-488.
37. Tully, S.; Winer, R. Are people willing to pay more for socially responsible products: A meta-analysis. Available online: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2240535 (accessed on 4 December 2014).
38. Loureiro, M.L.; Lotade, J. Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecol. Econ. 2005, 53, 129-138.
39. Barrientos, S.; Dolan, C. Ethical Sourcing in the Global Food System; Earthscan: London, UK, 2006.
40. Klintman, M.; Boström, M. Political consumerism and the transition towards a more sustainable food regime. Looking behind and beyond the organic shelf. In Food Practices in Transition: Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in the Age of Reflexive Modernity; Spaargaren, G., Loeber, A., Oosterveer, P., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 107-130.
41. Mol, A.P.J. Transparency and value chain sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.012.
42. Levidow, L.; Murphy, J.; Carr, S. Recasting "substantial equivalence": Transatlantic governance of gm food. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2007, 32, 26-64.
43. Jasanoff, S. Between risk and precaution-reassessing the future of GM crops. J. Risk Res. 2000, 3, 277-282.
44. Food and Drug Administration. Genetically Engineered Foods. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/testimony/ucm115032.htm (accessed on 10 November 2014).
45. Harmon, A.; Pollack, A. Battle brewing over labeling of genetically modified food. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/25/science/dispute-over-labeling-of-geneticallymodified-food.html?_r=0 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
46. Sjerven, J. U.S.D.A. approves 'non-bioengineered' label. Available online: http://www.nxtbook.com/sosland/fbn/2013_07_02/index.php?startid=44 (accessed on 4 December 2014).
47. Strom, S. US approves a label for meat from animals fed a diet free of gene-modified products. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/business/us-approves-a-label-for-meatfrom-animals-fed-a-diet-free-of-gene-modified-products.html?_r=0 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
48. D'Ambrosio, D. Labels sought for genetically modified food. Available online: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/06/12/labels-being-sought-for-geneticallymodified-food/2417459/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
49. Grobe, D.; Raab, C. Voters' response to labeling genetically engineered foods: Oregon's experience. J. Consum. Aff. 2004, 38, 320-331.
50. Hoban, T.J. American consumers' awareness and acceptance of biotechnology. In NABC Report 13: Genetically Modified Food and the Consumer; Eaglesham, A., Pueppke, S.G., Hardy, R.W.F., Eds.; 2001; pp. 51-68.
51. Tims, D. Dr. Bronner's betting big on Oregon's pro-GMO labeling campaign. Available online: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/09/dr_bronners_betting_big_on_ore.html (accessed on 10 November 2014).
52. Gasparro, A.; Bunge, J. Food industry wins round in GMO-labeling fight. Available online: http://online.wsj.com/articles/colorado-voters-defeat-proposal-to-require-gmo-labeling-of-foods-1415206857 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
53. #102, Consumers organization. Personal communication, 2013.
54. Boyd, V. Vermont appears on verge of passing GMO labeling law. Available online: http://www.thegrower.com/news/Vermont-appears-on-verge-of-passing-GMO-labeling-law-256555221.html (accessed on 10 November 2014).
55. #111, Environmental organization. Personal communication, 2014.
56. CSPI is not in favor of GMO labeling advocating instead that consumers purchase certified USDA organic if they wish to avoid GMOs
57. Oregon Right to Know. Why label GMO foods. Available online: http://oregonrighttoknow.org/why-label-gmos-or-ge-food/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
58. #116, Agriculture policy organization. Personal communication, 2014.
59. #107, Biotech company. Personal communication, 2013.
60. Remsen, N. Trade groups sue VT over GMO labeling law. Available online: http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/12/gma-sues-vt-gmo-law/10389209/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
61. #104, Government biotechnology official. Personal communication, 2013.
62. Loureiro, M.L.; Hine, S. Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policies. Food Policy 2004, 5, 467-483.
63. This number is based on a 2014 study conducted by Lesser and Lynch that addresses the costs of producing GM food in the state of New York. The study presents cost estimates for three different options that firms would have in complying with a mandatory labeling law: Labeling, substituting non-GMO ingredients, or substituting organic. The study presents various cost ranges based on aggregates of these with higher costs being associated with purchasing a higher percentage of organic products.
64. ECONorthwest. GE foods labeling cost study findings. Available online: https://consumersunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/GMO_labeling_cost_findings_Exe_Summ.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2014).
65. MacVean, M. Company says no more GMO ingredients in Smart Balance spreads. Available online: http://articles.latimes.com/2014/mar/04/news/la-dd-smart-balance-20140304 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
66. Hughlett, M. Target rolling out organic, natural grocery brand. Available online: http://www.startribune.com/business/210659481.html (accessed on 10 November 2014).
67. Hale, T. How 10 retailers are pushing private label's potential. Available online: http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/news/2014/how-10-retailers-arepushing-private-labels-potential.html (accessed on 10 November 2014).
68. Peckenpaugh, D. Top 35 private label retailers. Available online: http://www.privatelabelbuyer.com/articles/87669-top-35-private-label-retailers (accessed on 10 November 2014).
69. Davis, S. How Target, Walgreens and Home Depot have forever changed the private label game. Available online: http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottdavis/2013/05/23/how-target-walgreens-andhome-depot-have-forever-changed-the-private-label-game/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
70. Peckenpaugh, D. PLbuyer names Whole Foods 2014 retailer of the year. Available online: http://www.privatelabelbuyer.com/articles/87767-plbuyer-names-whole-foods-2014-retailer-ofthe-year (accessed on 10 November 2014).
71. Trader Joe's. Trader Joe's products are sourced from non-GMO ingredients. Available online: http://www.traderjoes.com/about/customer-updates-responses.asp?i=4 (accessed on 10 November 2014).
72. Greenfeld, K. GMO-free private label leads the pack. Available online: http://supermarketnews.com/blog/gmo-free-private-label-leads-pack (accessed on 10 November 2014).
73. Schultz, H. GMO labeling push will propel organic market, Organic Monitor says. Available online: http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/GMO-labeling-push-will-propel-organic-market-Organic-Monitor-says (accessed on 10 November 2014).
74. Gillespie, J.; Nehring, R.; Hallahan, C.; Sandretto, R. Adoption of recombinant bovine somatotropin and farm profitability: Does farm size matter? AgBioForum 2010, 13, 251-262.
75. Wong, V. Grocers line up-early-against biotech salmon. What about Wal-Mart? Available online: http://notinmyfood.org/article/grocers-line-up-early-against-biotech-salmon-what-about-wal-mart (accessed on 4 December 2014).
76. Ben & Jerry's. Our non-GMO standards. 2014. Available online: http://www.benjerry.com/values/issues-we-care-about/support-gmo-labeling/our-non-gmo-standards (accessed on 10 November 2014).
77. Hughes, C. Chipotle GMO labels: Setting precedent for fast food industry? Available online: http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/chipotle-gmo-labels-fast-food/2013/06/18/id/510489/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
78. Whole Foods Market. GMO: Your right to know. Available online: http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/gmo-your-right-know (accessed on 5 August 2014).
79. General Mills. National labeling-not state-by-state. Available online: http://www.generalmills.com/en/ChannelG/Issues/national_labeling_2014.aspx (accessed on 4 December 2014).
80. Horovitz, B. Cheerios drops genetically modified ingredients. Available online: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/01/02/cheerios-gmos-cereals/4295739/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
81. Buss, D. Americans still aren't buying GMO-free gospel. Just ask General Mills. Available online: http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalebuss/2014/02/20/americans-still-arent-buying-gmo-gospel-askgeneral-mills/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
82. Non-GMO Project. The "Non-GMO Project Verified" seal. Available online: www.nongmoproject.org/learn-more/understanding-our-seal/(accessed on 10 November 2014).
83. Davison, J. GM plants: Science, politics and economic regulations. Plant Sci. 2014, 178, 94-98.
84. McEvoy, M. Organic 101: Can GMOs be used in organic products? Available online: http://blogs.usda.gov/2013/05/17/organic-101-can-gmos-be-used-in-organic-products/(accessed on 4 December 2014).
85. Roseboro, K. Experts say GMO labels needed, not national non-GMO labeling standard. Available online: http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/september-2014/experts-say-gmo-labels-needednot-non-gmo-labeling.php (accessed on 4 December 2014).
86. Foley, J. GMOs, silver bullets and the trap of reductionist thinking. Available online: http://ensia.com/voices/gmos-silver-bullets-and-the-trap-of-reductionist-thinking/(accessed on 4 December 2014).