Oilfield produced water treatment by ceramic membranes: Preliminary process cost estimation

Desalination

Volumn 360, Issue , 2015, Pages 81-86

  Weschenfelder, S E ^a,b   Mello, A C C ^a,b   Borges, C P ^b   Campos, J C ^b  

^a PETROBRAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Cost estimation; Process; Produced water; Treatment

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MATERIALS; COST ESTIMATING; COSTS; EFFLUENTS; OIL FIELDS; OIL SHALE; PROCESSING; RECOVERY; WATER TREATMENT;

COST ESTIMATIONS; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; OILFIELD PRODUCED WATERS; PRODUCED WATER; SEPARATION EFFICIENCY; TREATMENT; WATER RECOVERY RATES;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES;

CERAMICS; COST ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE; OIL FIELD; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84921044525     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Silahi S.H.D., Leiknes T. Cleaning strategies in ceramic microfiltration membranes fouled by oil and particulate matter in produced water. Desalination 2009, 236:160-169.
2. Igunnu E.T., Chen G.Z. Produced water treatment technologies. Int. J. Low Carbon Technol. 2012, 1-21.
3. Brasil N.I., Araújo M.A.A., De Souza E.C.M. Processamento primário de petróleo e gás 2011, 299. LTC, Rio de Janeiro.
4. Zhong J., Sun X., Wang C. Treatment of oily wastewater produced from refinery processes using flocculation and ceramic membrane filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 32.
5. Çakmakçe M., Kayaalp N., Koyuncu I. Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes. Desalination 2008, 222.
6. Ebrahimi M., Willershausen D., Ashaghi K.S., Engel L., Placido L., Mund P., Bolduan P., Czermak P. Investigations on the use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced water treatment. Desalination 2010, 250.
7. Fakhru'l-Razi A., Pendashteh A.R., Chuah A.L., Radiah A.B.D., Madaeni S.S., Zurina Z.A. Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:530-551.
8. Souza A.L.S., Furtado C.J.A. Reinjeção de água produzida na Petrobras: perspectivas e desafios. Bol. Téc. Prod. Petról. Rio J. 2006, 1(n.2).
9. Li L., Lee R. Purification of produced water by ceramic membranes: material screening, process design and economics. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44(15):3455-3484.
10. 3 MF membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142:235-243.
11. Wang P., Xu N., Shi J. A pilot study of the treatment of waste rolling emulsion using zirconia microfiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 173:159-166.
12. Kwan S.M., Yeung K.L. Zeolit micro-fuel cell. Chem. Commun. 2008, 31:3631-3633.
13. Hua F.L., Tsang Y.F., Wang Y.J., Chan S.Y., Chua H., Sin S.N. Performance study of ceramic microfiltration membrane for oil wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 128:169-175.
14. Srijaroonrat P., Julien E., Aurelle Y. Unstable secondary oil/water emulsion treatment using ultrafiltration: fouling control by backflushing. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 159:11-20.
15. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, Technomic, Pennsylvania.
16. Singh N., Cheryan M. Process design and economic analysis of a ceramic membrane system for microfiltration of corn starch hydrolysate. J. Food Eng. 1998, 38:57-67.
17. Salehi E., Madaeni S.S., Laki S. Aplicabilility of ceramic membrane filters in pretreatment of coke-contaminated petrochemical wastewater: economic feasibility study. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40:4805-4810.
18. Krawczyk H., Jonsson A.S. The influence of feed flow channel diameter on frictional pressure drop, membrane performance and process cost in full-scale tubular ceramic membranes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2014, 92.
19. Sanciolo P., Gray S. Outcomes of Membrane Research: Impacts on the Australian and International Water Industry 2014, Water Research Australia.
20. Guerra K., Pellegrino J. Investigation of low-pressure membrane performance, cleaning, and economics using a techno-economic modeling approach. Science and Technology Program Report 2012, 174.
21. Loh H.P., Lyons J., White C.W. Process Equipment Cost Estimation Final Report 2002, NETL, US Department of Energy, USA.
22. Zhang H., Shong Z., Xing W. Application of ceramic membranes in the treatment of oilfield-produced water: effects of polyacrylamide and inorganic salts. Desalination 2013, 309.
23. Sterling M.C., Ojo T., Autenrieth R.L., Bonner J.S., Page C.A., Ernest A.N.S. Coalescence kinetics of dispersed crude oil in a laboratory reactor. Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar 1999, vol. 2:741-754. Environment Canada.
24. Schulz C.K. Tratamento de efluentes oleosos utilizando processos de separação por membrana 2005, (Doctoral dissertation), Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro.
25. Mohammadi T., Kazemimoghadam M., Saadabadi M. Modeling of membrane fouling and decline in reverse osmosis during separation of oil in water emulsions. Desalination 2003, 157:369-375.
26. Mohammadi T., Pak A., Karbassian M., Golshan M. Effect of operating conditions on microfiltration of an oil-water emulsion by a kaolin membrane. Desalination 2004, 168:201-205.
27. Abadi S.R.H., Sebzari M.R., Hemati M., Rekabdar F., Mohammadi T. Ceramic membrane performance in microfiltration of oily wastewater. Desalination 2011, 265.
28. Ebrahimi M., Lavi G., Schmidts T., Runkel F., Czermak P. Development and production of oil-in-water vehicles sub-micron emulsion using tubular ceramic membranes. Desalination 2008, 224:40-45.
29. Mohammadi M., Kazemi M., Madaeni S.S. Hydrodynamic factors affecting flux and fouling during reverse osmosis of seawater. Desalination 2002, 151:239-245.