When implicit fails: Explicit but not implicit attitudes predict choices of decided and undecided voters

Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-7

  Berthet, V ^a   Barthelemy L ^a   Kop, J L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Implicit Association Test; Implicit attitudes; Undecided voters; Voting intention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921028468     PISSN: 11629088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ReferencesBybee, C. R., McLeod, J. M., Luetscher, W. D., & Garramone, G. (1981). Mass commu-nication and voter volatility. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 69-90.
2. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino, & E. T.Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of socialbehavior (pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODEmodel as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimentalsocial psychology (Vol. 23) (pp. 79-109). New York: Academic Press.
4. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research:Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
5. Friese, M., Bluemke, M., & Wanke, M. (2007). Predicting voting behavior with implicitattitude measures-The 2002 German parliamentary election. Experimental Psy-chology, 54, 247-255.
6. Friese, M., Smith, C. T., Plischke, T., Bluemke, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2012). Do implicitattitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters? PLoSONE, 7, e44130.
7. Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., & Gawronski, B. (2008). Automatic mental associations predictfuture choices of undecided decision-makers. Science, 321, 1100-1102.
8. Gawronski, B., & Galdi, S. (2011). Using implicit measures to read the minds of unde-cided voters. In M. Cadinu, S. Galdi, & A. Maass (Eds.), Social perception, cognition,and language in honour of Arcuri (pp. 203-216). Padova: CLEUP.
9. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
10. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual dif-ferences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
11. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using theimplicit association test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
12. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understandingand using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of predictive validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
13. Greenwald, A. G., Smith, C. T., Sriram, N., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Raceattitude measures predicted vote in the 2008 US Presidential Election. Analysesof Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 241-253.
14. Karpinski, A., Steinman, R. B., & Hilton, J. L. (2005). Attitude importance as a mod-erator of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 949-962.
15. Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicitevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584.
16. Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., & Hawkins, C. B. (2010). Implicit political cognition. InB. Gawronski, & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition (pp.548-564). New York, NY: Guilford.
17. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: Theperspective of the MODE model. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Bri'nol (Eds.),Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19-63). New York, NY:Psychology Press.
18. Roccato, M., & Zogmaister, C. (2010). Predicting the vote through implicit and explicitattitudes: A field research. Political Psychology, 31, 249-274.