Total Interpretive Structural Modeling (TISM) of the Enablers of a Flexible Control System for Industry

Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 63-85

  Jayalakshmi, B ^a,b   Pramod, V R ^b  

^a KARPAGAM UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b NSS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (India)

Author keywords

Enablers; Flexible control system; ICT; Interaction matrix; Interpretive logic knowledge base; TISM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921023450     PISSN: 09722696     EISSN: 09740198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40171-014-0080-y     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Attri, P., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: An overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences,2(2), 3–8.
2. Bidarian, S., Bidarian, S., & Davoudi, A. M. (2011). A model for application of ICT in the process of teaching and learning. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences,29, 1032–1041.
3. Bohm, C. (2013). Cultural flexibility in ICT projects: A new perspective on managing diversity in project teams. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,14(2), 115–122.
4. Dubey, R. S., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Identification of flexible manufacturing system dimensions and their interrelationship using total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,15(2), 131–143.
5. Faizal, M. N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). Supply chain risk mitigation: Modeling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal,12(4), 535–552.
6. Farris, D. R., & Sage, A. P. (1975). On the use of interpretive structural modelling for worth assessment. Computers and Electrical Engineering,2(2/3), 149–174.
7. Hollenstein, H. (2004). Determinants of the adoption of ICT: An empirical analysis based on firm-level data for the Swiss business sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15(3), 315–342. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://freewimaxinfo.com/point-to-point-wireless-networks.html.
8. Kumar, S., Luthra, S., & Haleem, A. (2013). Customer involvement in greening the supply chain: An interpretive structural modeling methodology. Journal of Industrial Engineering International,9(6), 1–13.
9. Lepmets, M., Mesquida, A. L., Cater-Steel, A., Mas, A., & Ras, E. (2014). The evaluation of the IT service quality measurement framework in industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,15(1), 39–57.
10. Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management,14(6), 52–59.
11. Nasim, S. (2011). Total interpretive structural modeling of continuity and change forces in e-government. Journal of Enterprise Transformation,1(2), 147–168.
12. Pramod, V. R., & Banwet, D. K. (2010). Interpretive structural modeling for understanding the inhibitors of a telecom service supply chain. In IEOM (Dhaka, Bangladesh), 9–10 January 2010.
13. Prasad, U. C., & Suri, R. K. (2011). Modeling of continuity and change forces in private higher technical education using total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,12(3–4), 31–40.
14. Sandbhor, S. S., & Botre, R. P. (2014). Applying total interpretive structural modeling to study factors affecting construction labour productivity. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building,14(1), 20–31.
15. Saxena, J. P., Sushil, & Vrat, P. (2006). Policy and strategy formulation: An application of flexible systems methodology. New Delhi: Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, GIFT Publishing.
16. Sharma, B. P., Singh, M. D., & Neha, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing barriers: An approach of interpretive structural modeling. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management,10(3), 35–52.
17. Singh, A. N., Picot, A., Kranz, J., Gupta, M. P., & Ojha, A. (2013). Information security management (ISM) Practices: Lessons from select cases from India and Germany. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,14(4), 225–239.
18. Singh, A. K., & Sushil (2013). Modeling enablers of TQM to improve airline performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,62(3), 250–275.
19. Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil (2013). Modeling strategic performance factors for effective strategic execution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,62(6), 354–582.
20. Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., & Strauss, N. (2014). Efficient managing of complex programs with project management services. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,15(1), 25–38.
21. Sushil (2005a). Interpretive matrix: A tool to aid interpretation of management in social research. Global Journal of Flexible System Management,6(2), 27–30.
22. Sushil (2005b). A flexible strategy framework for managing continuity and change. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness,1(1), 22–32.
23. Sushil (2009). Interpretive ranking process. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 10(4), 1–10.
24. Sushil (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management,13(2), 87–106.
25. Thakkar, J., Deshmugh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., & Shankar, R. (2007). An integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling and analytic network process. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,56(1), 25–59.
26. Thompson, H. A. (2004). Wireless and Internet communications technologies for monitoring and control. Control Engineering Practice,12(6), 781–791.
27. Tripathy, S., Sahu, S., & Ray, P. K. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling for critical success factors of R&D performance in Indian manufacturing firms. Journal of Modelling in Management,8(2), 212–240.
28. Warfield, J. N. (1974a). A Science of Generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
29. Warfield, J. N. (1974b). Towards interpretation of complex structural models. IEEE Transactions: System, Man and Cybernetics,4(5), 405–417.
30. Wasuja, S., Sagar, M., & Sushil (2012). Cognitive bias in salespersons in speciality drug selling of pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing,6(4), 310–335.