Developing a cell-based spatial optimization model for land-use patterns planning

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 9139-9158

  Huang, Chun Wei ^a   Lin, Yu Pin ^a   Ding, Tzung Su ^a   Anthony, Johnathen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Dynamically dimensioned search; Landscape; Scale; Spatial optimization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BIRD; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MODEL VALIDATION; OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES CONSERVATION; UPLAND REGION;

TAIWAN;

AVES;

EID: 84921020011     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6129139     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ligmann-Zielinska, A.; Church, R.L.; Jankowski, P. Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2008, 22, 601-622.
2. Lin, Y.-P.; Verburg, P.H.; Chang, C.-R.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, M.-H. Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in taiwan. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 92, 242-254.
3. Holzkämper, A.; Lausch, A.; Seppelt, R. Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements. Ecol. Model. 2006, 198, 277-292.
4. Holzkämper, A.; Seppelt, R. Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 136, 117-127.
5. Westphal, M.I.; Field, S.A.; Possingham, H.P. Optimizing landscape configuration: A case study of woodland birds in the mount lofty ranges, south australia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 81, 56-66.
6. Lin, Y.-P.; Huang, C.-W.; Ding, T.-S.; Wang, Y.-C.; Hsiao, W.-T.; Crossman, N.D.; Lengyel, S.; Lin, W.-C.; Schmeller, D.S. Conservation planning to zone protected areas under optimal landscape management for bird conservation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 60, 121-133.
7. Ball, I.; Possingham, H. Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing: A Manual. Avaliable online: http://www.marineplanning.org/pdf/marxan_manual_1_8_2.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2014).
8. Moilanen, A. Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 134, 571-579.
9. Loonen, W.; Heuberger, P.; Kuijpers-Linde, M. Spatial optimisation in land-use allocation problems. In Modelling Land-Use Change; Springer: Berlin, German, 2007; pp. 147-165.
10. Loman, J.; Schantz, T. Birds in a farmland-More species in small than in large habitat island. Conserv. Biol. 1991, 5, 176-188.
11. Loman, J. Small habitat islands are inferior breeding habitats but are used by some great tits-Competition or ignorance? Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 1467-1479.
12. Zakaria, M.; Rajpar, M.N.; Moradi, H.V.; Rosli, Z. Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge-interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of malaysia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 16, 375-392.
13. Tscharntke, T.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Kruess, A.; Thies, C. Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 2002, 12, 354-363.
14. Haenke, S.; Kovács-Hostyánszki, A.; Fründ, J.; Batáry, P.; Jauker, B.; Tscharntke, T.; Holzschuh, A. Landscape configuration of crops and hedgerows drives local syrphid fly abundance. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 51, 505-513.
15. Moilanen, A.; Possingham, H.P.; Polasky, S. A mathematical classification of conservation prioritization problems. In Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods & Computational Tools; Moilanen, A., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 28-42.
16. Tolson, B.A.; Shoemaker, C.A. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resour. Res. 2007, doi:10.1029/2005WR004723.
17. Lozano, M.; García-Martínez, C. Hybrid metaheuristics with evolutionary algorithms specializing in intensification and diversification: Overview and progress report. Comput. Oper. Res. 2010, 37, 481-497.
18. McGraigal, K.C.; Samuel, A. The gradient concept of landscape structure. In Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology; Wiens, J.A., Moss, M.R., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 112-119.
19. Tolson, B.A.; Shoemaker, C.A. Efficient prediction uncertainty approximation in the calibration of environmental simulation models. Water Resour. Res. 2008, doi:10.1029/2007WR005869.
20. Matott, L.S.; Leung, K.; Sim, J. Application of matlab and python optimizers to two case studies involving groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37, 1894-1899.
21. Lin, C.-W.; Hsu, F.-H.; Ding, T.-S. Applying a territory mapping method to census the breeding bird community composition in a montane forest of taiwan. Taiwan J. For. Sci. 2011, 26, 267-285.
22. Westphal, M.I.; Pickett, M.; Getz, W.M.; Possingham, H.P. The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations. Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13, 543-555.
23. Villard, M.A.; Metzger, J.P. Review: Beyond the fragmentation debate: A conceptual model to predict when habitat configuration really matters. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 51, 309-318.
24. Reid, J.L.; Mendenhall, C.D.; Rosales, J.A.; Zahawi, R.A.; Holl, K.D. Landscape context mediates avian habitat choice in tropical forest restoration. PLoS One 2014, 9, e90573.
25. Graham, L.L.; Page, S.E. Artificial bird perches for the regeneration of degraded tropical peat swamp forest: A restoration tool with limited potential. Restor. Ecol. 2012, 20, 631-637.
26. Pouzols, F.M.; Burgman, M.A.; Moilanen, A. Methods for allocation of habitat management, maintenance, restoration and offsetting, when conservation actions have uncertain consequences. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 153, 41-50.
27. Lindenmayer, D.; Knight, E.; Crane, M.; Montague-Drake, R.; Michael, D.; MacGregor, C. What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143, 289-301.
28. Grainger, M.J.; van Aarde, R.J.; Wassenaar, T.D. Landscape composition influences the restoration of subtropical coastal dune forest. Restor. Ecol. 2011, 19, 111-120.
29. Cole, R.J.; Holl, K.D.; Zahawi, R.A. Seed rain under tree islands planted to restore degraded lands in a tropical agricultural landscape. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20, 1255-1269.
30. Wagner, H.H.; Fortin, M.-J. Spatial analysis of landscapes: Concepts and statistics. Ecology 2005, 86, 1975-1987.
31. Buckland, S.; Cole, N.C.; Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J.; Gallagher, L.E.; Henshaw, S.M.; Besnard, A.; Tucker, R.M.; Bachraz, V.; Ruhomaun, K.; Harris, S.; et al. Ecological effects of the invasive giant madagascar day gecko on endemic mauritian geckos: Applications of binomial-mixture and species distribution models. PLoS One 2014, 9, e88798.
32. Pedrana, J.; Bernad, L.; Maceira, N.O.; Isacch, J. Human-sheldgeese conflict in agricultural landscapes: Effects of environmental and anthropogenic predictors on sheldgeese distribution in the southern pampa, argentina. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 183, 31-39.