Relationship between long-range diffusion and diffusion in the ZIF-8 and polymer phases of a mixed-matrix membrane by high field NMR diffusometry

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 477, Issue , 2015, Pages 123-130

  Mueller, Robert ^a   Zhang, Suihua ^a   Zhang, Chen ^b   Lively, Ryan ^b   Vasenkov, Sergey ^a  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion; Gas separations; Mixed matrix membranes; PFG NMR; ZIF 8

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; ETHYLENE; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

GAS SEPARATIONS; HIGH MAGNETIC FIELDS; LONG-RANGE DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENT; MIXED MATRIX MEMBRANES; PFG-NMR; PULSED FIELD GRADIENTS; ZIF-8;

GAS PERMEABLE MEMBRANES;

CARBON 13; ETHYLENE; POLYMER; SORBIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; DYNAMICS; MAGNETIC FIELD; MEMBRANE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED FIELD GRADIENT NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; THICKNESS;

EID: 84920972666     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Koros W.J., Lively R.P. Water and beyond: expanding the spectrum of large-scale energy efficient separation processes. AlChE J. 2012, 58:2624-2633.
2. Baker R.W. Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41:1393-1411.
3. Jeazet H.B.T., Staudt C., Janiak C. Metal-organic frameworks in mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41:14003-14027.
4. Yao J.F., Wang H.T. Zeolitic imidazolate framework composite membranes and thin films: synthesis and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43:4470-4493.
5. Huang A., Wang N., Kong C., Caro J. Organosilica-functionalized zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-90 membrane with high gas-separation performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51:10551-10555.
6. Basu S., Khan A.L., Cano-Odena A., Liu C.Q., Vankelecom I.F.J. Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39:750-768.
7. Bernardo P., Drioli E., Golemme G. Membrane gas separation: a review/state of the art. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:4638-4663.
8. Noble R.D. Perspectives on mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:393-397.
9. Chung T.S., Jiang L.Y., Li Y., Kulprathipanja S. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32:483-507.
10. Dong G.X., Li H.Y., Chen V.K. Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1:4610-4630.
11. Goh P.S., Ismail A.F., Sanip S.M., Ng B.C., Aziz M. Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81:243-264.
12. Zornoza B., Tellez C., Coronas J., Gascon J., Kapteijn F. Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 166:67-78.
13. 2 separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2011, 46:1250-1261.
14. Funk C.V., Lloyd D.R. Zeolite-filled microporous mixed matrix (ZeoTIPS) membranes: prediction of gas separation performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:224-231.
15. Dorosti F., Omidkhah M.R., Pedram M.Z., Moghadam F. Fabrication and characterization of polysulfone/polyimide-zeolite mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171:1469-1476.
16. 4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413:48-61.
17. Askari M., Chung T.S. Natural gas purification and olefin/paraffin separation using thermal cross-linkable co-polyimide/ZIF-8 mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:173-183.
18. 4 permeation in high zeolite 4A loading mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:197-203.
19. Vu D.Q., Koros W.J., Miller S.J. Mixed matrix membranes using carbon molecular sieves-I. Preparation and experimental results. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:311-334.
20. Zhang C., Dai Y., Johnson J.R., Karvan O., Koros W.J. High performance ZIF-8/6FDA-DAM mixed matrix membrane for propylene/propane separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389:34-42.
21. Ploegmakers J., Japip S., Nijmeijer K. Mixed matrix membranes containing MOFs for ethylene/ethane separation part A: membrane preparation and characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428:445-453.
22. 2 separation: a fully atomistic simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116:19268-19277.
23. Aroon M.A., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T., Montazer-Rahmati M.M. Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75:229-242.
24. Hoang V.T., Kaliaguine S. Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: a review. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113:4980-5028.
25. Petropoulos J.H., Papadokostaki K.G., Minelli M., Doghieri F. On the role of diffusivity ratio and partition coefficient in diffusional molecular transport in binary composite materials, with special reference to the Maxwell equation. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 456:162-166.
26. Kärger J., Ruthven D.M., Theodorou D.N. Diffusion in Nanoporous Materials 2012, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
27. Mueller R., Kanungo R., Kiyono-Shimobe M., Koros W.J., Vasenkov S. Diffusion of ethane and ethylene in carbon molecular sieve membranes by pulsed field gradient NMR. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 181:228-232.
28. Mueller R., Kanungo R., Kiyono-Shimobe M., Koros W.J., Vasenkov S. Diffusion of methane and carbon dioxide in carbon molecular sieve membranes by multinuclear pulsed field gradient NMR. Langmuir 2012, 28:10296-10303.
29. Zhang C., Zhang K., Xu L.R., Labreche Y., Kraftschik B., Koros W.J. Highly scalable ZIF-based mixed-matrix hollow fiber membranes for advanced hydrocarbon separations. AlChE J. 2014, 60:2625-2635.
30. 2 transport in polysulfone membranes containing zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as determined by permeation and PFG NMR techniques. Macromolecules 2010, 43:316-325.
31. Zhang C., Gee J.A., Sholl D.S., Lively R.P. Crystal-size-dependent structural transitions in nanoporous crystals: adsorption-induced transitions in ZIF-8. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118:20727-20733.
32. Dvoyashkin M., Zang J., Yucelen G.I., Katihar A., Nair S., Sholl D.S., Bowers C.R., Vasenkov S. Diffusion of tetrafluoromethane in single-walled aluminosilicate nanotubes: pulsed field gradient NMR and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116:21350-21355.
33. Cotts R.M., Hoch M.J., Sun T., Markert J.T. Pulsed field gradient stimulated echo methods for improved NMR diffusion measurements in heterogeneous systems. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 83:252-266.
34. Gibbs S.J., Johnson C.S., PFG A. NMR experiment for accurate diffusion and flow studies in the presence of eddy currents. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 93:395-402.
35. Gottlieb H.E., Kotlyar V., Nudelman A. NMR chemical shifts of common laboratory solvents as trace impurities. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62:7512-7515.
36. Geier O., Snurr R.Q., Stallmach F., Karger J. Boundary effects of molecular diffusion in nanoporous materials: a pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance study. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120:367-373.
37. Chmelik C., Freude D., Bux H., Haase J. Ethene/ethane mixture diffusion in the MOF sieve ZIF-8 studied by MAS PFG NMR diffusometry. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 147:135-141.
38. Latour L.L., Mitra P.P., Kleinberg R.L., Sotak C.H. Time-dependent diffusion coefficient of fluids in porous media as a probe of surface-to-volume ratio. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1993, 101:342-346.