Ensuring the success of IPBES: Between interface, market place and parliament

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1662, 2015, Pages 1-6

  Vohland, Katrin ^a   Nadim, Tahani ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTION AND BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Ecosystem service; Global governance; IPBES; Option value

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; CAPACITY BUILDING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; POLICY MAKING; STAKEHOLDER;

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 84920937865     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005 Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
2. Hotes S, Opgenoorth L. 2014 Trust and control at the science-policy interface in IPBES. BioScience 64, 277-278. (doi:10.1093/biosci/biu019)
3. Hulme M et al. 2011 Science-policy interface: beyond assessments. Science 333, 697-698. (doi:10.1126/science.333.6043.697)
4. Opgenoorth L, Hotes S, Mooney H. 2014 IPBES: biodiversity panel should play by rules. Nature 506, 159. (doi:10.1038/506159a)
5. Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B. 2012 Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 488, 454-455. (doi:10. 1038/488454a)
6. Turnhout E, Neves K, Lijster de EB. 2014 ‘Measurementality’ in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environ. Plann. A 46, 581-597. (doi:10.1068?a4629)
7. Gupta A. 2008 Transparency under scrutiny: information discourse in global environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Politics 8, 1-7. (doi:10. 1162/glep.2008.8.2.1)
8. Rothman DS, Bers CV, Bakkes J, Pahl-Wostl C on behalf of The Integrated Assessment Society. 2009 How to make global assessments more effective: lessons from the assessment community. Cosust 1, 214-218. (10.1016/j.cosust.2009.09.002)
9. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. 2003 Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8086-8091. (10.1073/pnas.1231332100)
10. Mitchell R, Clark W, Cash D, Dickson N (eds). 2006 Global environmental assessments: information and influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Shapin S. 1995 Cordelia’s love: credibility and the social studies of science. Persp. Sci. 3, 255-275.
12. Baumgärtner S. 2007 The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services. Nat. Resour. Model. 20, 87-127. (doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2007.tb00202.x)
13. Mc Neely JA, Miller KR, Reid WV, Mittermeier RA, Werner TB. 1990 Conserving the World’s biological diversity. In International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, pp. 1-193. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-US, and the World Bank.
14. Jasanoff S, Martello M (eds). 2004 Earthly politics: local and global in environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Stirling A. 2010 Keep it complex. Nature 468, 1029-1031. (doi:10.1038/4681029a)
16. Hirsch E. 2004 Boundaries of creation: the work of credibility in science and ceremony. In Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia (eds E Hirsch, M Strathern), pp. 176-192. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
17. Vohland K, Mlambo M, Horta LD, Jonsson B, Paulsch A, Martinez SI. 2011 How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES? Environ. Sci. Policy 14, 1188-1194. (doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.005)
18. St Clair AL. 2006 The World Bank as a transnational expertised institution. Glob. Gov. 12, 77-95.
19. Koetz T, Bridgewater P, Hove S, Siebenhüner B. 2008 The role of the subsidiary body on scientific, technical and technological advice to the convention on biological diversity as science-policy interface. Environ. Sci. Policy 11, 505-516. (doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.001)
20. Faith DP, Magallón S, Hendry AP, Conti E, Yahara T, Donoghue MJ. 2010 Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2, 1-9. (doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.04.002)
21. Opgenoorth L, Faith DP. 2014 The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), up and walking. Front. Biogeogr. 5, 207-211.
22. Beck S et al. 2014 Towards a reflexive turn in governing global environmental expertise: the case of the IPCC and IPBES. GAIA 23, 80-87. (doi:10. 14512/gaia.23.2.4)
23. Stengers I. 2005 Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cult. Stud. Rev. 11, 183-196.