In-flight photogrammetric camera calibration and validation via complementary lidar

ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Volumn 100, Issue , 2015, Pages 3-13

  Gneeniss, A S ^a   Mills, J P ^a   Miller, P E ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aerial triangulation; Bundle adjustment; Calibration; Digital camera; Lidar; Registration

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; DIGITAL CAMERAS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; ROCK MECHANICS; TRIANGULATION;

AERIAL TRIANGULATION; AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION; BUNDLE ADJUSTMENTS; CAMERA CALIBRATION; GROUND CONTROL POINTS; REGISTRATION; ROBUST LEAST SQUARES; SURFACE MATCHING ALGORITHMS;

OPTICAL RADAR;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AERIAL TRIANGULATION; ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; DATA SET; LIDAR; MODEL VALIDATION; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 84920918896     PISSN: 09242716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akca D. Matching of 3D surfaces and their intensities. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2007, 62(2):112-121.
2. Alamús R., Kornus W. DMC geometry analysis and virtual image characterisation. Photogramm. Rec. 2008, 23(124):353-371.
3. Armenakis C., Gao Y., Sohn G. Co-registration of aerial photogrammetric and lidar point clouds in urban environments using automatic plane correspondence. Appl. Geomatics 2013, 5(2):155-166.
4. Baltsavias E.P. A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 1999, 54(2):83-94.
5. Brenner C., Dold C., Ripperda N. Coarse orientation of terrestrial laser scans in urban environments. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63(1):4-18.
6. Cramer M.( The DGPF test on digital airborne camera evaluation overview and test design. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinform. 2010, 2010(2):73-82.
7. Gneeniss A.S., Mills J.P., Miller P.E. Reference lidar surfaces for aerial triangulation and camera calibration. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2013, 40(B1):111-116.
8. Grenzdörffer G. Performance of medium format digital airborne cameras. Official Publ. - EuroSDR 2010, 58:233-265.
9. Haala N., Hastedt H., Wolf K., Ressl C., Baltrusch S. Digital photogrammetric camera evaluation generation of digital elevation models. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinform. 2010, 2010(2):99-115.
10. Habib A., Ghanma M., Morgan M., Al-Ruzouq R. Photogrammetric and lidar data registration using linear features. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2005, 71(6):699-707.
11. Habib A., Kersting A.P., Kim C.J. Impact of camera and system calibration on photogrammetric reconstruction using medium format digital camera. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2010, 38:6.
12. Habib A., Pullivelli A., Mitishita E., Ghanma M., Kim E.M. Stability analysis of low-cost digital cameras for aerial mapping using different georeferencing techniques. Photogramm. Rec. 2006, 21(113):29-43.
13. Heipke C., Jacobsen K., Mills J. Theme issue: "digital aerial cameras". ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 60(6):361-362.
14. Hodgson M.E., Bresnahan P. Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70(3):331-340.
15. Honkavaara E. Calibration field structures for GPS/IMU/camera-system calibration. Photogramm. J. Finland 2003, 18(2):3-15.
16. Honkavaara E., Ahokas E., Hyyppä J., Jaakkola J., Kaartinen H., Kuittinen R., Markelin L., Nurminen K. Geometric test field calibration of digital photogrammetric sensors. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 60:387-399.
17. Jacobsen K. Development of program system BLUH for bundle block adjustment in the University of Hannover. Dept. Surv. Univ. Hannover 1998, 227:157-162.
18. Jacobsen K. Direct/integrated sensor orientation-pros and cons. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2004, 35(B3):829-835.
19. Jacobsen, K., 2007. Geometry of digital frame cameras. In: ASPRS annual conference, May 7-11, Tampa, Florida USA, p. 12.
20. Jacobsen, K., 2008. BLUH bundle block adjustment. Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation, Leibniz University Hannover, Program user manual, p. 34.
21. Jacobsen K., Cramer M., Ladstadter R., Ressl C., Spreckels V. DGPF-project: evaluation of digital photogrammetric camera systems geometric performance. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinform. 2010, 2:83-97.
22. James T.D., Murray T., Barrand N.E., Barr S.L. Extracting photogrammetric ground control from lidar DEMs for change detection. Photogramm. Rec. 2006, 21(116):312-328.
23. Jaw J., Wu Y. Control patches for automatic single photo orientation. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 72(2):151.
24. Jaw, J.J., 1999. Control surface in aerial triangulation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Envirnmental Enginaeering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, p 98.
25. Kunz M., Mills J.P., Miller P.E., King M.A., Fox A.J., Marsh S. Application of surface matching for improved measurements of historic glacier volume change in the Antarctic Peninsula. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2012, 39(8):579-584.
26. Kwak T.-S., Kim Y.-I., Yu K.-Y., Lee B.-K. Registration of aerial imagery and aerial lidar data using centroids of plane roof surfaces as control information. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2006, 10(5):365-370.
27. Lim M., Mills J.P., Barr S.L., Barber D., Glendinning S., Parkin G., Hall J., Clarke B. High resolution earth imaging for transport corridor slope stability risk analysis. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2007, 36(A1):6.
28. Liu X., Zhang Z., Peterson J., Chandra S. Lidar-derived high quality ground control information and DEM for image orthorectification. GeoInformatica 2007, 11(1):37-53.
29. Maling D.H. Measurements from Maps 1989, Pergamon Press, New York, USA, p. 577.
30. McGlone J. Manual of Photogrammetry 2013, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. sixth ed.
31. Miller P., Mills J., Edwards S., Bryan P., Marsh S., Mitchell H., Hobbs P. A robust surface matching technique for coastal geohazard assessment and management. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63(5):529-542.
32. Miller P.E., Mills J.P., Barr S.L., Birkinshaw S.J., Hardy A.J., Parkin G., Hall S.J. A remote sensing approach for landslide hazard assessment on engineered slopes. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50(4):1048-1056.
33. Mills J.P., Buckley S.J., Mitchell H.L., Clarke P.J., Edwards S.J. A geomatics data integration technique for coastal change monitoring. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 2005, 30(6):651-664.
34. Mitishita E., Habib A., Centeno J., Machado A., Lay J., Wong C. Photogrammetric and lidar data integration using the centroid of a rectangular roof as a control point. Photogramm. Rec. 2008, 23(121):19-35.
35. Petrie G., Walker A.S. Airborne digital imaging technology: a new overview. Photogramm. Rec. 2007, 22(119):203-225.
36. Postolov Y., Krupnik A., McIntosh K. Registration of airborne laser data to surfaces generated by photogrammetric means. Int. Arch. Photogramm Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 1999, 32(3):95-99.
37. Rönnholm P. Registration quality - towards integration of laser scanning and photogrammetry. Official Publ. - EuroSDR 2011, (59). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
38. Sandau R. Digital Airborne Camera: Introduction and Technology 2009, Springer, p. 350.
39. Shin S.W., Habib A.F., Ghanma M., Kim C., Kim E.-M. Algorithms for multi-sensor and multi-primitive photogrammetric triangulation. ETRI J. 2007, 29(4):411-420.
40. Wang M., Tseng Y.-H. Incremental segmentation of lidar point clouds with an octree-structured voxel space. Photogramm. Rec. 2011, 26(133):32-57.
41. Wolf P.R., Ghilani C.D. Adjustment Computations: Statistics and Least Squares in Surveying and GIS 1997, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
42. Yastikli, N., Toth, C., 2007. In-situ camera and boresight calibration with lidar data. In: The fifth International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, May 29-31, Padua, Itália, p. 6.