Power sharing in fisheries co-management in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam

Marine Policy

Volumn 53, Issue , 2015, Pages 171-179

  Ho, Nga Thi Thanh ^a   Ross, Helen ^a   Coutts, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Decentralization; Legislation; Legislative framework; Policy

Indexed keywords

COMANAGEMENT; DECENTRALIZATION; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY POLICY; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; POWER RELATIONS;

TAM GIANG LAGOON; VIET NAM;

EID: 84920874471     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Berkes F. Co-management: bridging the two solitudes. Northern Perspect 1994, 22:18-20.
2. Berkes F. Adaptive co-management and complexity: exploring the many faces of co-management. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance 2007, UBS Press. D. Armitage, F. Berkes, N. Doubleday (Eds.).
3. Berkes F., George P.J., Preston R.J. Co-management: the evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternatives 1991, 18:12-18.
4. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar M.T, Kothari A, Renard Y. Sharing power. learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world IIED and IUCN/ CEESP/ CMWG, Cenesta, Tehran; 2004.
5. Carlsson L., Berkes F. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. J Environ Manage 2005, 75:65-76.
6. Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive co-management for building reslisience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manage 2004, 34:75-79.
7. Pinkerton E. Co-operative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development 1989, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
8. Zurba M., Ross H., Izurieta A., Rist P., Bock E., Berkes F. Building co-management as a process: problem solving through partnerships in Aboriginal country, Australia. Environ Manage 2012, 49.
9. McCay B.J., Jentoft S. From the bottom up: participatory issues in fisheries management. Soc Nat Resour 1996, 9(3):237-250.
10. Sen S., Nielsen J.R. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Mar Policy 1996, 20:405-418.
11. Parsons T. On the concept of political power. Proc Am Phil Soc 1963, 107:232-262.
12. Lukes S. Power: a radical view 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK. 2nd ed.
13. VeneKlasen L., Miller V., Budlender D., Clark C. A new weave of power, people, and politics: the action guide for advocacy and citizen participation. Bourton-on-Dunsmore 2007, c2007. Practical Action Pub., Warwickshire, UK. D. Budlender, C. Clark (Eds.).
14. Jentoft S. Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Mar Policy 2000, 24:141-148.
15. Njaya F., Donda S., Béné C. Analysis of power in fisheries co-management: experiences from Malawi. Soc Nat Resour 2011, 25:652-666.
16. Pomeroy R.S., Berkes F. Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Mar Policy 1997, 21:465-480.
17. Trimble M., Berkes F. Participatory research towards co-management: lessons from artisanalfisheries in coastal Uruguay. J Environ Manage 2013, 128:768-778.
18. Béné C., Belal E., Baba M.O., Ovie S., Raji A., Malasha I., et al. Power struggle, dispute and alliance over local resources: analyzing 'democratic' decentralization of natural resources through the Lenses of Africa Inland Fisheries. World Dev 2009, 37:1935-1950.
19. Sandstrom A., Rova C. Adaptive co-management networks: a comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecol Soc 2010, 15.
20. Berkes F. Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environ Conserv 2010, 37:489-500.
21. Satria A., Matsuda Y. Decentralization of fisheries management in Indonesia. Mar Policy 2004, 28:437-450.
22. Burns D., Hambleton R., Hoggett P. The politics of decentralisation: revitalising local democracy 1994, Macmillan, Basingstoke, England.
23. Truong V.T., Armitage D., Marschke M. Livelihoods and co-management in the Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam. Ocean Coastal Manage 2010, 53:327-335.
24. Truong T. The diversity of livelihoods of resource user groups in Tam Giang-Cau Hai lagoon. Buiilding co-management of common pool resources in coastal Central Vietnam 2010, (in Vietnamese), Agricultural Publising House, Ha Noi, Vietnam. T. Truong, S. Le (Eds.).
25. Huong T., Berkes F. Diversity of resource use and property rights in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam. Int J Commons 2011, 5:130-149.
26. Thanh T., Hoi N. Environmetnal-natural-ecological and resource issues of Tam Giang-Cau Hai lagoon system. Sienctific workshop on Thua Thien Hue lagoons. Hai Phong, Vietnam; 1994.
27. Thung D. Environment and resources in the Tam Giang-Cau Hai Lagoon. Integrated management of lagoon activities-IMOLA project report. People's Committee of Thua Thien Hue Province, FAO and Cooperazione Italian, Hue, Vietnam; 2007.
28. Tuyen T.V. The aquaculture expansion in Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam and its management challenges. Communities in Southeast Asia 2002, Challenges and Responses University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. H. Lansdowne, P. Dearden, W. Neilson (Eds.).
29. Armitage D., Marschke M., Tuyen T.V. Early-stage transformation of coastal marine governance in Vietnam. Mar Policy 2011, 35:703-711.
30. Yen T.K.N., Luong V.P. Participatory village and commune development planning (VDP/CDP) and its contribution to local community development in Vietnam. Commun Dev J 2008, 43.
31. Mof W.B. Vietnam fisheries and aquaculture sector study 2005, Ministry of Fisheries, Vietnam.
32. Pomeroy R., Nguyen T.K.A., Ha X.T. Small-scale marine fisheries policy in Vietnam. Mar Policy 2009, 33:419-428.
33. Ho TTN, Ross H, Coutts J. Building fisheries co-management in a developing country: Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam (in preparation).
34. Holloway J. Change the world without taking power: the meaning of revolution today 2003, Pluto Press.
35. Dahl R.A. The concept of power. Behav Sci 1957, 2:201-214.
36. Bachrach P., Morton S.B. Two faces of power. Am Polit Sci Rev 1962, 56:947-952.
37. Lukes S. Power: a radical view 1974, Macmillan, London.
38. Gaventa J. Reflections on the uses of the 'power cube' approach for analyzing the spaces, places and dynamics of civil society participation and engagement 2005, MFP Breed Network, The Netherlands.
39. Guijt I. Synthesis report of Dutch CFA programme evaluation. Assessing civil society participation as supported in-country by Cordaid, Hivos, Novib and Plan Netherlands 1999-2004: The Netherlands: MFP Breed Netwerk; 2005.
40. VeneKlasen L., Miller V. A new weave of power, people and politics: the action guide for advocacy and citizen participation 2002, World Neighbors, Oklahoma City, OK.
41. Raik D.B., Wilson A.L., Decker D.J. Power in natural resources management: an application of theory. Soc Nat Resour 2008, 21:729-739.
42. Agrawal A., Ribot J. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. J Dev Areas 1999, 33:473-502.
43. Yin R.K. Case study research: design and methods 2009, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 4th ed.
44. Nielsen J.R., Degnbol P., Viswanathan K.K., Ahmed M., Hara M., Abdullah N.M.R. Fisheries co-management-an institutional innovation? lessons from South East Asia and Southern Africa. Mar Policy 2004, 28:151-160.
45. KimDung N., Bush S., Mol A.J. Administrative co-management: the case of special-use forest conservation in Vietnam. Environ Manage 2013, 51:616-630.
46. Ribot J.C. Democratic decentralisation of natural resources 2002, World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.