Demarcation in science education: Toward an enhanced view of scientific method

Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Controversy

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3-19

  Duschl, Richard A ^a   Grandy, Richard E ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920846717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Ackerman, R. J. (1985). Data, Instruments, and Theory: A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Chapman, M. (2006). God or gorilla: A Darwin descendant at the Dover Monkey Trial. Harper's Magazine, February, 54-63.
3. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Touchstone.
4. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young People's Images of Science. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
5. Duschl, R. (2004). Assessment of inquiry. In J. M. Atkin & J. C. Coffey (Eds.) Everyday Assessment in the Science Classroom. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
6. Duschl, R., & Grandy, R., (Eds.) (2008a). Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Instruction. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SensePublishers.
7. Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2008b). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.) Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Instruction. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SensePublishers.
8. Eflin, J., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 107-116.
9. Giere, R. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Giere, R. (1999). Science without Laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and Reality: An Introduction to Philosophy of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Grandy, R. E., & Duschl, R. A. (2008). Consensus: Expanding the scientific method and school science. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.) Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Instruction. Rotterdam, Netherlands: SensePub-lishers.
13. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources from learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 53-91.
14. Kelly, G. J., & Duschl, R. (2002). Toward a research agenda for epistemological studies in science education. Invited paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), April 2002, New Orleans, LA.
15. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929.
16. Lederman, N., Abd-el-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science questionnaire: Towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
17. Longino, H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The Nature of Science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.) The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 41-52). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Standards in Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (www.nap.edu).
20. Osborne, J. F., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "Ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
21. Pickering, A. (1990). Knowledge, practice and mere construction. In Deconstructing Quarks, Special Issue of Social Studies of Science, 20(4), 682-729.
22. Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students' preconceptions about the epi-stemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559-580.
24. Smith, C., & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among three aspects of first-year college students' epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747-785.
25. Solomon, M. (2001). Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth, and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 28-47.
27. Windschitl, M. (2004). Caught in the cycle of reproducing folk theories of "Inquiry": How pre-service teachers continue the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.
28. Zammito, J. H. (2004). A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.