An exploratory study to test the impact on three "bolt-On" items to the EQ-5D

Value in Health

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 52-60

  Yang, Yaling ^a   Rowen, Donna ^b   Brazier, John ^b   Tsuchiya, Aki ^b,c   Young, Tracey ^b   Longworth, Louise ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bolt on; EQ 5D; health state valuation; hearing; tiredness vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROQOL FIVE DIMENSIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; VISION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADOLESCENT; EUROPE; HEARING DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; VISION DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; EUROPE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84920795095     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J.E. Brazier, and R. Fitzpatrick Measures of health-related quality of life in an imperfect world: a comment on Dowie Health Econ 11 2002 17 19
2. J.E. Brazier, D. Rowen, and I. Mavranezouli Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome) Health Technol Assess 16 2012 1 114
3. R. Brooks EuroQol: the current state of play Health Policy 37 1996 53 72
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2008 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence London, UK
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence London, UK
6. J. Tosh, J. Brazier, P. Evans, and L. Longworth A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders Value Health 15 2012 118 127
7. D. Papaioannou, J. Brazier, and G. Parry How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review Value Health 14 2011 907 920
8. J. Brazier, J. Connell, and D. Papaioannou A systemetic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures Health Technol Assess 18 2014 1 188
9. M. Herdman, C. Gudex, and A. Lloyd Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Qual Life Res 20 2011 1727 1736
10. P.F. Krabbe, M.E. Stouthard, M.L. Essink-Bot, and G.J. Bonsel The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 293 301
11. Y. Yang, J. Brazier, and A. Tsuchiya Effect of adding a sleep dimension to the EQ-5D descriptive system: a "bolt-on" experiment Med Decis Making 34 2014 42 53
12. Gudex C. Are we lacking a dimension of energy in the EuroQol instrument? Paper presented at: the 8th Pleanary Meeting of the EuroQol Group, Lund, Sweden, 1991.
13. Y. Yang, L. Longworth, and J. Brazier An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment Qual Life Res 22 2013 2813 2828
14. Wailoo A, Davis S, Tosh J. The Incorporation of Health Benefits in Cost-Utility Analysis Using the EQ-5D: A Report by the NICE DSU. 2010. Available from: http://www.nicedsu.org.uk/. [Accessed November 5, 2014].
15. P. Dolan Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states Med Care 35 1997 1095 1108
16. P. Dolan, C. Gudex, P. Kind, and A. Williams The time trade-off method: results from a general population study Health Econ 5 1996 141 154
17. Department of Health. Health Survey for England. 2006. Available from: http://wwwicnhsuk/pubs/hse06cvdandriskfactors). 2006. [Accessed September 18, 2010].
18. AFD. Names and Numbers software 2012. Available from: www.afd.co.uk. [Accessed January 15, 2011].
19. C G Time Trade-Off User Manual: Props and Self-Completion Methods 1994 Centre for Health Economics, University of York York, UK
20. J. Brazier, D. Rowen, and A. Tsuchiya The impact of adding an extra dimension to a preference-based measure Soc Sci Med 73 2011 245 253
21. A. Tsuchiya, J. Brazier, and J. Roberts Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets J Health Econ 25 2006 334 346