An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2813-2828

  Yang, Yaling ^a   Longworth, Louise ^a   Brazier, John ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EQ 5D; Hearing impairments; HUI3; Responsiveness; SF 6D; Validity

Indexed keywords

HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84892817871     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0417-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008). NICEGuide to theMethods of TechnologyAppraisal.NICE, London .
2. Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA) (2003). Canada. Canada Common Drug Review Submission Guidelines for Manufacturers.
3. Scotish Medicine Consortium (SMC) (2007). Scotlant. Guidance to Manufacturers for Completion of New Product Assessment Form (NPAF). .
4. Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5(1),1.
5. Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53-72.
6. Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095-1108.
7. Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271-292.
8. Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113-128.
9. Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M. F., Kind, P., Parkin, D. et al. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727-1736.
10. Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J.,&Day, N. A. (2001). Acomparison of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 358-370.
11. Longworth, L., & Bryan, S. (2003). An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Economics, 12(12), 1061-1067.
12. Brazier, J. E., Tsuchiya, A., Roberts, J., & Busschbach, J. (2004). A comparison of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Economics, 13(9), 873-884.
13. Feeny, D., Wu, L., & Eng, K. (2004). Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and health utilities index mark 2 and mark 3 utility scores: Results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Quality of Life Research, 13(10), 1659-1670.
14. Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005).Acomparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and diseasespecific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1571-1582.
15. National Institute of Health and clinical Excellence (NICE) (2004). NICE Guide to the Methods ofTechnologyAppraisal.NICE, London.
16. Brazier, J. E., Rowen, D., Mavranezouli, I., Tsuchiya, A., Young, T., Yang, Y., et al. (2012). Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition specific measures (and other patient based measures of outcome). Health Technology Assessment, 16(32), 1366-5278.
17. Tosh, J., Brazier, J., Evans, P., & Longworth, L. (2012). A review of generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in visual disorders. Value in Health, 15(1), 118-127.
18. Papaioannou, D., Brazier, J., & Parry, G. (2011). How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review. Value Health, 14(6), 907-920.
19. Harper, R., Brazier, J. E., Waterhouse, J. C., Walters, S. J., Jones, N. M., & Howard, P. (1997). Comparison of outcome measures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in an outpatient setting. British Medical Journal, 52(10), 879.
20. Sand, P. K., Staskin, D., Miller, J., Diokno, A., Sant, G. R., Davila, G. W., et al. (1999). Effect of a urinary control insert on quality of life in incontinent women. International Urogynecology Journal, 10(2), 100-105.
21. Kobelt, G., Kirchberger, I., &MaloneLee, J. (1999). Ouality of life aspects of the overactive bladder and the effect of treatment with tolterodine. British journal of urology (Print), 83(6), 583-590.
22. Brazier, J., & Deverill, M. (1999). A checklist for judging preference based measures of health related quality of life: Learning from psychometrics. Health Economics, 8(1), 41-51.
23. Dalton, D. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Wiley, T. L., & Nondahl, D. M. (2003). The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 661.
24. Barton, G. R., Bankart, J., & Davis, A. C. (2005). A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures. International Journal of Audiology, 44(3), 157-163.
25. Pickard, A. S., Wilke, C. T., Lin, H. W., & Lloyd, A. (2007). Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics, 25(5), 365-384.
26. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press.
27. Lovett, R. E. S., Kitterick, P. T., Hewitt, C. E., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2010). Bilateral or unilateral cochlear implantation for deaf children: an observational study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95(2), 107-112.
28. Smith-Olinde, L., Grosse, S. D., Olinde, F., Martin, P. F., & Tilford, J. M. (2008). Health state preference scores for children with permanent childhood hearing loss: A comparative analysis of the QWB and HUI3. Quality of Life Research, 17(6), 943-953.
29. Bichey, B. G., Hoversland, J. M., Wynne, M. K., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2002). Changes in quality of life and the cost-utility associated with cochlear implantation in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Otology and neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 7(3), 323.
30. Grutters, J. P. C., Joore, M. A., van der Horst, F., Verschuure, H., Dreschler, W. A., & Anteunis, L. J. C. (2007). Choosing between measures: Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Quality of Life Research, 16(8), 1439-1449.
31. Joore, M., Brunenberg, D., Zank, H., van der Stel, H., Anteunis, L., Boas, G., et al. (2002). Development of a questionnaire to measure hearing-related health state preferences framed in an overall health perspective. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(03), 528-539.
32. Joore, M. A., van der Stel, H., Peters, H. J. M., Boas, G. M., & Anteunis, J. C. (2003). The cost-effectiveness of hearing-aid fitting in the Netherlands. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 129(3), 297-304.
33. Lee, H. Y., Park, E. C., Joong Kim, H., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, H. N. (2006). Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implants in Korea using different measures of utility. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 126(8), 817-823.
34. Joore, M. A. (2002). Response shift in the measurement of quality of life in hearing impaired adults after hearing aid fitting. Quality of life research: An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 11(4), 299-307.
35. Joore, M. A. B. (2003). Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired. International Journal of Audiology, 42(3), 152-160.
36. Vuorialho, A., Karinen, P., & Sorri, M. (2006). Effect of hearing aids on hearing disability and quality of life in the elderly. International Journal of Audiology, 45(7), 400-405.
37. Cheng, A. K., Rubin, H. R., Powe, N. R., Mellon, N. K., Francis, H. W., & Niparko, J. K. (2000). Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA: The journal of the American Medical Association, 284(7), 850-856.
38. Hol, M. K. S., Spath, M. A., Krabbe, P. F. M., van der Pouw, C. T. M., Snik, A. F. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J., et al. (2004). The bone-anchored hearing aid: Quality-of-life assessment. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 130(4), 394-399.
39. Vuorialho, A., Karinen, P., & Sorri, M. (2006). Counselling of hearing aid users is highly cost-effective. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 263(11), 988-995.
40. Sach, T. H., & Barton, G. R. (2007). Interpreting parental proxy reports of (health-related) quality of life for children with unilateral cochlear implants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71(3), 435-445.
41. Barton, G. R., Stacey, P. C., Fortnum, H. M., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2006). Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom. IV: Cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation (Structured abstract). Ear and Hearing, 5, 575-588.
42. Palmer, C. S., Niparko, J. K., Wyatt, J. R., Rothman, M., & de Lissovoy, G. (1999).Aprospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant. Archives of OtolaryngologyGÇ ö-Head and Neck Surgery, 125(11), 1221.
43. Damen, G. W. J. A., Beynon, A. J., Krabbe, P. F. M., Mulder, J. J. S., & Mylanus, E. A. M. (2007). Cochlear implantation and quality of life in postlingually deaf adults: Long-term follow-up. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 136(4), 597-604.
44. Yang, Y., Brazier, J. E., Tsuchiya, A., & Young, T. A. (2011). Estimating a preference-based index for a 5-dimensional health state classification for asthma derived from the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Medical Decision Making, 31(2), 281-291.
45. Rowen, D., Brazier, J. E., Young, T. A., Gaugrist, S., Craig, B. M., King, M. T., & Velikova, G. (2011). Deriving a preferencebased measure for cancer using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Value in Health, 14(5), 721-731.
46. Brazier, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2010). Preference-based conditionspecific measures of health: What happens to cross programme comparability? Health Economics, 19(2), 125-129.
47. Krabbe, P. F. M., Stouthard, M. E. A., Essink-Bot, M. L., & Bonsel, G. J. (1999). The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(4), 293-301.