Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning

NeuroReport

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 45-49

  Martínez Velázquez, Eduardo S ^a   Ramos Loyo, Julieta ^a   González Garrido, Andrés A ^a   Sequeira, Henrique ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

adolescence; feedback related negativity; gambling; probabilistic learning; reward

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEEDBACK RELATED NEGATIVITY; GAMBLING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LEARNING; MALE; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REWARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; PROBABILITY LEARNING; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REWARD;

EID: 84920775332     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000291     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Steinberg L. Risk-taking in adolescence: new perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2007; 16:55-59.
2. Tamnes CK, Walhovd KB, Torstveit M, Sells VT, Fjell AM. Performance monitoring in children and adolescents: a review of developmental changes in the error-related negativity and brain maturation. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2013; 6:1-13.
3. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002; 295:2279-2282.
4. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Schurger A, Cohen JD. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14:741-747.
5. Galvan A, Hare TA, Parra CE, Penn J, Voss H, Glover G, Casey BJ. Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. J Neurosci 2006; 26:6885-6892.
6. San Martín R. Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6:304-320.
7. Holroyd CB, Coles MG. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002; 109:679-709.
8. Grose-Fifer J, Migliaccio R, Zottoli TM. Feedback processing in adolescence: an event-related potential study of age and gender differences. Dev Neurosci 2014; 36 (3-4):228-238.
9. Zottoli TM, Grose-Fifer J. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in adolescents. Psychophysiology 2012; 49:413-420.
10. Santesso DL, Dzyundzyak A, Segalowitz SJ. Age, sex and individual differences in punishment sensitivity: factors influencing the feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology 2011; 48:1481-1489.
11. Yi F, Chen H, Wang X, Shi H, Yi J, Zhu X, Yao S. Amplitude and latency of feedback-related negativity: aging and sex differences. Neuroreport 2012; 23:963-969.
12. Walsh MM, Anderson JR. Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012; 36:1870-1884.
13. Hämmerer D, Li SC, Müller V, Lindenberger U. Life span differences in electrophysiological correlates of monitoring gains and losses during probabilistic reinforcement learning. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23:579-592.
14. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. WAIS III. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós. Press; 2002.
15. Brown TE. Brown attention deficit disorder scales for adolescents and adults. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation Press; 1996.
16. Torrubia R, Ávila C, Caseras X, Molto J. The sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. J Individ Differ 2001; 31:837-862.
17. Eppinger B, Kray J, Mock B, Mecklinger A. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46:521-539.
18. Bellebaum C, Daum I. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27:1823-1835.
19. Walsh MM, Anderson JR. Modulation of the feedback-related negativity by instruction and experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:19048-19053.
20. Crowley MJ,Wu J, Hommer RE, South M, Molfese PJ, Fearon RM, Mayes LC. A developmental study of the feedback-related negativity from 10-17 years: age and sex effects for reward versus non-reward. Dev Neuropsychol 2013; 38:595-612.
21. Van Leijenhorst L, Zanolie K, van Meel CS, Westenberg PM, Rombouts SA, Crone EA. What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20:61-69.
22. Holroyd CB, Pakzad-Vaezi KL, Krigolson OE. The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. Psychophysiology 2008; 45:688-697.
23. Yang Q, Gu R, Tang P, Luo YJ. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses? Psychophysiology 2013; 50:1094-1103.