Amplitude and latency of feedback-related negativity: Aging and sex differences

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 963-969

  Yi, Fei ^a   Chen, Haiyan ^a   Wang, Xiang ^a   Shi, Huqing ^a   Yi, Jinyao ^a   Zhu, Xiongzhao ^a   Yao, Shuqiao ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

age; feedback related negativity; gambling; middle and late adolescents; sex

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; BUSS PERRY AGGRESSION QUESTIONNAIRE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK RELATED NEGATIVITY; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPULSIVENESS; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867176026     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328359d1c4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Zottoli TM, Grose-Fifer J. The feedback-related negativity (FRN) in adolescents. Psychophysiology 2011; 49:413-420.
2. Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9: 788-798. (Pubitemid 28025194)
3. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002; 295: 2279-2282. (Pubitemid 34258845)
4. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Schurger A, Cohen JD. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14:741-747. (Pubitemid 38856949)
5. Martin CA, Kelly TH, Rayens MK, Brogli BR, Brenzel A, Smith WJ. Sensation seeking, puberty, and nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana use in adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41:1495-1502. (Pubitemid 44698527)
6. Casey BJ, Rebecca MJ, Hare TA. The adolescent brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1124:111-126. (Pubitemid 351506787)
7. Cauffman E, Shulman EP. Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task. Dev Psychol 2010; 46:193-207.
8. Onoda K, Abe S, Yamaguchi S. Feedback-related negativity is correlated with unplanned impulsivity. Neuroreport 2010; 21:736-739.
9. Kamarajan C, Rangaswamy M, Tang Y, Chorlian DB, Pandey AK, Roopesh BN. Dysfunctional reward processing in male alcoholics: an ERP study during a gambling task. J Psychiatr Res 2010; 44: 576-590.
10. Van Meel CS, Oosterlaan J, Heslenfeld DJ, Sergeant JA. Telling good from bad news: ADHD differentially affects processing of positive and negative feedback during guessing. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 1946-1954. (Pubitemid 41317411)
11. Eppinger B, Mock B, Kray J. Developmental differences in learning and error processing: evidence from ERPs. Psychophysiology 2009; 46: 1043-1053.
12. Hammerrer D, Li S, Muller V, Lindenberger U. Life span differences in electrophysiological correlates of monitoring gains and losses during probabilistic reinforcement learning. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23: 579-592.
13. Steinberg L, Cauffman E. Maturity of judgment in adolescence: psychosocial factors in adolescents decision making. Law Hum Behav 1996; 20: 249-272. (Pubitemid 26256115)
14. Wang XT, Daniel JK, Andreas W. Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evol Hum Behav 2009; 30:77-84.
15. Crowley MJ, Wu J, Crutcher C, Bailey CA, Lejuez CW, Mayes LC. Risk-taking and the feedback negativity response to loss among at-risk adolescents. Dev Neurosci 2009; 31:137-148.
16. Santesso DL, Dzyundzyak A, Segalowitz SJ. Age, sex and individual differences in punishment sensitivity: factors influencing the feedback-related negativity. Psychophysiology 2011; 48:1-8.
17. Van Elst LT, Hesslinger B, Thiel T, Geiger E, Haegele K, Lemieux L, et al. Frontolimbic brain abnormalities in patients with borderline personality disorder: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:163-171. (Pubitemid 36859776)
18. Von Borries AKL, Brazil IA, Bulten BH. Neural correlates of error-related learning deficits in individuals with psychopathy. Psychol Med 2010; 40:1559-1568.
19. Holroyd CB, Krigolson OE. Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology 2007; 44: 913-917. (Pubitemid 47609608)
20. Wild-Wall N, Willemssen R, Falkenstein M. Feedback-related processes during a time-production task in young and older adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120:407-413.
21. Wenji Y. The study of reliability and validity of the aggression questionnaire (revised edition) [Unpublished master's thesis]. Guangzhou, Guangdong: Jinan University; 2007 (in Chinese).
22. Larsona MJ, Southa M, Clayson PE. Sex differences in error-related performance monitoring. Neuroreport 2011; 22:44-48.
23. Li CR, Huang C, Constable RT, Sinha R. Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task. Neuroimage 2006; 32:1918-1929. (Pubitemid 44332288)
24. Holroyd CB, Coles MGH. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002; 109:679-709.
25. Amiez C, Joseph JP, Procyk E. Reward encoding in the monkey anterior cingulate cortex. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16:1040-1055. (Pubitemid 43992453)