So Far So Good: Next Steps in Community Forestry

Promise, Trust and Evolution: Managing the Commons of South Asia

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Kanel, Keshav Raj ^a  

^a Forest Department   (Nepal)

Author keywords

Development; Future of community forestry; Globalization; Nepal resources; Second generation reforms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920751360     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213832.003.0017     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Adhikari, B. (2003). 'Property Rights and Natural Resources: Socio-economic Heterogeneity and Distributional Implications of Common Property Resource Management'. Working Paper No 1.03, South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE), Kathmandu, Nepal.
2. Agrawal, A., and Ostrom, E. (2001). 'Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal'. Politics and Society, 29: 485-514.
3. Agrawal, A., Britt, C., and Kanel, K. (1999). Decentralization in Nepal: A Comparative Analysis. Oakland, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
4. Bampton, J., Vickers, B., Rana, B., and Statz, J. (2004). 'Community Forestry in the Terai', in K. R. Kanel, P. Mathema, B. R. Kandel, D. R. Niraula, A. R. Sharma, and M. Gautam (eds.), Twenty Five Years of Community Forestry: Contributing to Millennium Development Goals. Kathmandu, Nepal: Community Forestry Division, Department of Forests, 317-32.
5. Bandyopadhyay, S., Shyamsunder, P., and Kanel, K. (2005). 'Forestry User Groups in Nepal: Can Institutional Change Lead to Economic Development?' Paper presented at Nepal Poverty Assessment Seminar organized by National Planning Commission Secretariat, His Majesty's Government of Nepal (HMG), Asian Development Bank, the World Bank, and Department For International Development in Kathmandu, Kathmandu, Nepal, 12 May.
6. Baral, J. C., and Subedi, B. R. (2000). 'Some Community Forest Issues in the Terai, Nepal: Where do We Go from Here?'. Forest, Trees and People Newsletter, 42: 20-5.
7. Birner, R. and Wittmer, H. (2000). 'Co-management of Natural Resources: A Transaction Cost Economic Approach to Determine the 'Efficient Boundary of the State'. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the International Society of the New Institutional Economics (ISNIE) in Tuebingen, Germany.
8. Branney, P., and Yadav, K. P. (1998). Changes in Community Forest Condition and Management 1994-1998: Analysis of Information from the Forest Resources Assessment Study and Socio-economic Study in the Koshi Hills. Project report G/NUKCFP/32. Kathmandu, Nepal: Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project.
9. DANIDA (Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and HMG (His Majesty's Government of Nepal) (2004). 'Programme Completion Report'. Natural Resource Management Sector Assistance Programme (NARMSAP)-February 1998-July 2005, DANIDA and HMG, Nepal.
10. Department of Forests (2005). Forest Cover Change Analysis of the Terai Districts (1990/91-2000/01). Report. Kathmandu, Nepal: His Majesty's Government, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Department of Forests.
11. Gautam, A. P., Webb, E. L., Shivakoti, G. P., and Zoebisch, M. A. (2003). 'Land Use Dynamics and Landscape Change Pattern in a Mountain Watershed in Nepal'. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 99: 83-96.
12. Gilmour, D. A., and Fisher, R. J. (1991). Villagers, Forests and Foresters. Kathmandu, Nepal: Sahayogi Press.
13. Jackson, W. J., Tamrakar, R. M., Hunt, S., and Shepherd, K. R. (1998). 'Land Use Changes in Two Middle Hills Districts of Nepal'. Mountain Research and Development, 18/3: 193-212.
14. Kanel, K. R. (2001). 'Forests, Collective Action, and Policy Instruments in Nepal: Aligning Decentralization with Fiscal Responsibility', in K. Suryanata, G. Dolcemascolo, R. Fisher, and J. Fox (eds.), Enabling Policy Frameworks for Successful Community-Based Resource Management. Proceedings from the Ninth Workshop on Community-Based Management of Forestlands (5 February-2 March 2001). Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Centre, 70-82.
15. Kanel, K. R. and Niraula, D. R. (2004). 'Can Rural Livelihood be Improved in Nepal through Community Forestry?' Banko Janakari 14/1: 19-26.
16. Kanel, K. R. Karmacharya, M. B., and Karna, B. K. (2003). 'Who Benefits from Institutional Reforms: Case Studies from Four Community Forests', in Keshav R. Kanel, Mukunda B. Karmacharya, and Birendra K. Karna (eds.), Human -Institutional Natural Resources Interactions: Understanding the Interface between Social and Natural Resource Systems. Proceedings of a Seminar held in Pokhara, Nepal, Kathmandu: Rising Son Printers, 66-82.
17. Livelihood and Forestry Programme (LFP) (2003). Hill Livelihoods Baseline Study, Part 1: Main Report of Quantitative Findings with Supplementary Qualitative Information, Part II: Report of Qualitative Findings. Report. Nepal: Livelihoods and Forestry Programme (LFP) in collaboration with TANGO International, Inc., USA, and Development Vision.
18. Pokharel, B. K., and Amatya, D. (2000). Community Forest Management Issues in the Terai. Issue Paper 9. Kathmandu, Nepal: Joint Technical Review Committee on Community Forestry, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation.
19. Rana, B. (2004). 'Understanding Conflicts between Government Resource Users: A Multi-criteria Analysis of Community Forestry Performance in Saptari District, Nepal'. M. Sc. thesis. International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, the Netherlands.
20. Richards, M., Kanel, K., Maharjan, M., and Davis, J. (1999). Towards Participatory Economic Analysis by Forest User Groups in Nepal. London: ODI, Portland House, Stag Place.
21. Scherr, S. J., White, A., and Kaimowitz, D. (2004). A New Agenda for Forest Conservation and Poverty Reduction: Making Markets Work for Low-Income Producers. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
22. Shrestha, K. (2005). 'Evaluation of Ongoing Performance of Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy and Governance (SAMARPAN) Project'. Report. Submitted to CARE, Nepal.
23. World Bank (1978). Nepal Staff Project Report and Appraisal of the Community Forestry Development and Training Project Document. Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.