Citizen-science programs: Towards transformative biodiversity governance

Environmental Development

Volumn 13, Issue , 2015, Pages 39-45

  Couvet, Denis ^a   Prevot, Anne Caroline ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity governance; Citizen science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920735950     PISSN: 22114645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bonney R., Shirk J.L., Phillips T.B., Wiggins A., Ballard H.L., Miller-Rushing A.J., Parrish J.K. Next steps for citizen science. Science 2014, 343:1436-1437.
2. Chevalier J.M., Buckles D.J. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry 2013, Routledge.
3. Conrad C.C., Hilchey K.G. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 176:273-291.
4. Cooper C.B., Dickinson J.L., Phillips T., Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12:11-21.
5. Cosquer A., Raymond R., Prévot-Julliard A.C. Observations of everyday biodiversity: a new perspective for conservation?. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17(4):2.
6. Couvet D., Devictor V., Jiguet F., Julliard R. Scientific contributions of extensive biodiversity monitoring. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334:370-377.
7. Cowan R., Gunby P. Sprayed to death: path dependence, lock-in and pest control strategies. Econ. J. 1996, 106:521-542.
8. Danielsen F., Burgess N.D., Jensen P.M., Pirhofer-Walzl K. Environmental monitoring: The scale and speed of implementation varies according to the degree of people's involvement. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:1166-1168.
9. Demeulenaere E., Goulet F. Du singulier au collectif: Agriculteurs et objets de la nature dans les réseaux d'agricultures « alternatives. Terrains Travaux 2012, 20:121-138. (2012/1).
10. Devictor V., Julliard R., Clavel J., Jiguet F., Lee A., Couvet D. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008, 17:252-261.
11. Dickinson J.L., Zuckerberg B., Bonter D.N. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2010, 41:149-172.
12. Evans C., Abrams E., Reitsma R., Roux K., Salmonsen L., Marra P.P. The neighborhood nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:589-594.
13. Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democraty. Habermas and the Public Sphere 1992, 109-142. Massachussets Institute of Technology. C. Calhoum (Ed.).
14. Geels F.W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 2002, 31:1257-1274.
15. Habermas J. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics 1971, Beacon Press.
16. Hallmann C.A., Foppen R.P.B., van Turnhout C.A.M., de Kroon H., Jongejans E. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 2014, 511:341-343.
17. Julliard R., Clavel J., Devictor V., Jiguet F., Couvet D. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:1237-1244.
18. Meinard Y., Quétier F. Experiencing biodiversity as a bridge over the science-society communication gap. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28:705-712.
19. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups 1965, Harvard University Press.
20. Owen H. Open Space Technology: A Users' Guide 1997, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
21. Pielke R.A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.
22. Reason P. Three approaches to participative inquiry. Handbook of Qualitative Research 1994, 324-339. Sage, Thousand Oaks. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
23. Snapp S.S., Blackie M.J., Gilbert R.A., Bezner-Kerr R., Kanyama-Phiri G.Y. Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:2840-2845.
24. Steel B.S., Lach D., Satyal V.A. Ideology and scientific credibility: environmental policy in the American Pacific Northwest. Public Underst. Sci. 2006, 15:481-495.
25. Turner W. Sensing biodiversity. Science 2014, 346:301-302.
26. van Wyk E., Roux D.J., Drackner M., McCool S.F. The impact of scientific information on ecosystem management: making sense of the contextual gap between information providers and decision makers. Environ. Manag. 2008, 41:779-791.
27. Wolfson D.J. Who gets what in environmental policy?. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 102:8-14.