How scenario-based learning can engender reflective practice in distance education

Finding Your Online Voice Stories told by Experienced Online Educators

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 53-72

  Naidu, Som ^a   Menon, Mohan ^b   Karunanayaka, Chandra Gunawardena ^c   Lekamge, Dayalatha ^c   Karunanayaka, Shironica ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b Technology and Knowledge Management   (Canada)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF SRI LANKA   (Sri Lanka)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920690010     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203825167     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Amundsen, C. L., & Bernard, R. M. (1989). Institutional support for peer contact in distance education: An empirical investigation. Distance Education, 18(2), 85–109.
2. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
3. Bernard, R. M., & Amundsen, C. L. (1989). Antecedents to dropout in distance education: Does one model fit all? Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 25–46.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1) 32–42.
5. Collis, B., & Moonen, J., The contributing student: Learners as co-developers of learning resources for reuse in Web environments. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies. Amsterdam: Springer.
6. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.
7. ESP 2240 Study Guide. (2004). The teacher educator as a teaching and learning specialist. Sri Lanka: The Open University of Sri Lanka, Department of Education.
8. Evensen, D. H., & Hmelo, C. E., (2000). Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Karunanayaka, S., Lekamge, D., Gunawardena, C., Naidu, S., & Menon, M. (2005). MATE (International) Program: A novel approach to developing global partnerships in teacher education. Paper presented at the Asian Roundtable on Open and Distance Learning for attainment of Millennium Development Goals, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. MATE-International. (2004). Program handbook: Master of Arts in Teacher Education (International), Sri Lanka: The Open University of Sri Lanka, Department of Education.
12. McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
13. Naidu, S. (2006). E-Learning: A Guidebook of principles, procedures and practices, 2nd edition. New Delhi, India: Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia (CEMCA), and the Commonwealth of Learning.
14. Naidu, S. (2004). Learning design as an indicator of quality in teacher education. In K. Rama & M. Menon (Eds.), Innovations in teacher education—International practices for quality assurance (pp. 65–76). Bangalore, India: NAAC.
15. Naidu, S., Menon, M., Gunawardena, C., Lekamge, D., & Karunanayaka, S. (2005). Quality teaching and learning in the Master of Arts in Teacher Education program at the Open University of Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
16. Naidu, S., & Oliver, M. (1996). Computer supported collaborative problem-based learning (CSC-PBL): An instructional design architecture for virtual learning in nursing education. Journal of Distance Education, 11 (2), 1–22.
17. Naidu, S., & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 27(5), 329–354.
18. Naidu, S., Oliver, M., & Koronios, A. (1999). Approaching clinical decision-making in nursing practice with interactive multimedia and case-based reasoning. The Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning [Online]. Retrieved on November 3, 2005, from http://imej.wfu.edu/
19. Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of Learning Sciences: Special Issue on Scaffolding, 13(3), 423–451.
20. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of Learning Sciences: Special Issue on Scaffolding, 13(3), 337–386.
21. Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of supporting and problematizing student work. The Journal of Learning Sciences: Special Issue on Scaffolding, 13(3), 273–304.
22. Schank, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
23. Schank, R. C. (1997). Virtual learning: A revolutionary approach to building a highly skilled workforce. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C., (1995). Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Schank, R.C., Fano, A., Jona, M., &Bell, B. (1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305–345.
26. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.
27. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.
28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.