Corrigendum:Risk Perceptions in UK Climate Change and Energy Policy Narratives [Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, (2014), 10.1080/1523908X.2014.906301];Risk Perceptions in UK Climate Change and Energy Policy Narratives

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 84-107

  Shin, Haeran ^a   Choi, Byung Doo ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Daegu University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

agenda setting; environmental policy narratives; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920665754     PISSN: 1523908X     EISSN: 15227200     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.951541     Document Type: Erratum

References (78)

1. Atkinson, R. (2000). Narratives of policy: The construction of urban problems and urban policy in the official discourse of British government 1968–1998. Critical Social Policy, 63(2), 211–232. doi: 10.1177/026101830002000202
2. Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/13669870802488883
3. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57, 641–651
4. BBC Climate Change Poll—February. 2010. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/05_02_10climatechange.pdf
5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage
6. Bickerstaff, K. (2004). Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environment International, 30(6), 827–840. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001
7. Boholm, Å., & Löfstedt, R. (1999). Issues of risk, trust and knowledge: The Hallandsås Tunnel case. Ambio, 28(6), 556–561.
8. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959–970
9. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
10. Cameron, D. (2010, May 14). [PM's speech at DECC]. HM Government.
11. Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457–1469
12. Ciampi, M. (2013). ‘Water divide’ in the global risk society. International Review of Sociology, 23(1), 243–260. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2013.771468
13. Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129–151. doi: 10.1177/1075547004270234
14. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. (2002). Survey of public attitudes to quality of life and to the environment –2001. London: Author.
15. Department for Trade and Industry. (2003). Energy white paper: Our energy future—creating a low carbon economy.
16. Department for Trade and Industry. (2006). The energy challenge energy review report 2006. London: Author
17. Department for Trade and Industry. (2007). Meeting the energy challenge: An energy White Paper. London: Author
18. van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse and Society, 6(2), 243–289
19. Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90, 22–23. doi: 10.1029/2009EO030002
20. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press
21. Dowding, K. (2006). Three-dimensional power: A discussion of Steven Lukes’ power: A radical view. Political Studies Review, 4, 136–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2006.000100.x
22. Downing, P., & Ballantyne, J. (2007). Tipping point or turning point? Ipsos Mori's Social Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/IPSOS_MORI_turning-point-or-tipping-point.pdf
23. Ereaut, G., & Segnit, N. (2006). Warm words. How are we telling the climate story and how can we tell it better? London: IPPR.
24. Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does narrative matter? Narrative analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339638
25. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Frewer, L. (1999). Risk perception, social trust, and public participation in strategic decision making: Implications for emerging technologies. Ambio, 28(6), 569–574.
27. Gardner, K., & Lewis, D. (2000). Dominant paradigms overturned or ‘business as usual’? Development discourse and the white paper on international development. Critique of Anthropology, 20(1), 15–29. doi: 10.1177/0308275X0002000106
28. Gray, L. (2009). ‘Climategate Scandal’ risks a deal at Copenhagen. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6469714/Climategate-scandalrisks-a-deal-at-Copenhagen-says-Stern.htmlsaysStern
29. Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. J., & Whatmore, S. (Eds.). (2009). The dictionary of human geography (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
30. Grube, D. (2012). Prime ministers and political narratives for policy change: Towards a heuristic. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 569–586. doi: 10.1332/030557312X13351982118318
31. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental narrative: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
32. Hargreaves, I., Lewis, J., & Speers, T. (2003). Towards a better map: Science, the public and the media. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
33. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Jackson, T. (2010). Environmental policy under New Labour. Local Economy, 25(5–6), 510–522. doi: 10.1080/02690942.2010.525990
35. Jameson, F. (1989). The political unconscious. Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge
36. Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception reliability. Engineering & System Safety, 59(1), 91–99. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00129-4
37. Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2010). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus (Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 77). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1549444
38. Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72
39. Lofstedt, R. E. (2011). Risk versus hazard—how to regulate in the 21st century. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2/2011, 149–168.
40. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
41. Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73–95
42. Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H., & Owens, S. (2009). Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 27(1), 90–109. doi: 10.1068/c0797j
43. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
44. MacGillivray, B. H. (2013). Heuristics structure and pervade formal risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 34(4), 771–787.
45. Margolis, H. (1996). Dealing with risk: Why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues. London: University of Chicago Press
46. Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York: Cambridge University Press
47. Nelkin, D. (1989). Communicating technological risk: The social construction of risk perception. Annual Review of Public Health, 10(1), 95–113
48. Norton, A., & Leaman, J. (2004). The day after tomorrow: Public opinion on climate change. London: MORI Social Research Institute
49. O'Neill, S., & Boykoff, M. T. (2010). The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. In L. Whitmarsh, S. O'Neill, & I. Lorenzoni (Eds.), Engaging the public with climate change: Communication and behaviour change (pp. 233–251). London: Earthscan.
50. O'Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). ‘Fear won't do it’: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355–379. doi: 10.1177/1075547008329201
51. Otway, H., & Thomas, K. (1982). Reflections on risk perception and policy 1, 2. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 69–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01368.x
52. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. New York, NY: Academic Press.
53. Pidgeon, N. F., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk perception. In Royal Society (Ed.), Risk: Analysis, perception and management: Report of a royal society study group (pp. 89–134). London: The Royal Society
54. Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement?’ Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 191–210
55. Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W. (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 69–85. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
56. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2003). Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: Main findings of a British survey of five risk cases. Norwich: University of East Anglia and MORI.
57. Quick, O. (2006). Outing medical errors: Questions of trust and responsibility. Medical Law Review, 14, 22–43. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwi042
58. Rayner, S. (1992). Cultural theory and risk analysis. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 83–115). Westport, CT and London: Praeger
59. Renn, O. (1998). The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59(1), 49–62. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00119-1
60. Renn, O., & Schweizer, P. J. (2009). Inclusive risk governance: Concepts and application to environmental policy making. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 174–185. doi: 10.1002/eet.507
61. Rosa, E. A. (1998). Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 15–44
62. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
63. Segnit, N., & Ereaut, G. (2007). Warm words II: How the climate story is evolving and the lessons we can learn for encouraging public action. London: IPPR. Retrieved from www.ippr.org.uk
64. Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 535–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
65. Sjöberg, L. (2000). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–12
66. Sjöberg, L. (2002). The allegedly simple structure of experts’ risk perception: An urban legend in risk research. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(4), 443–459. doi: 10.1177/016224302236176
67. Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B. M. (2008). Risk perception by politicians and the public. Energy & Environment, 19(3), 455–483. doi: 10.1260/095830508784641408
68. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 2(2), 83–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x
69. Stone, C. (1982). Social stratification, nondecision-making, and the study of community power. American Politics Quarterly, 10(3), 275–302. doi: 10.1177/1532673X8201000301
70. Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Precautions against what? The availability heuristic and cross-cultural risk perception. Alabama Law Review, 57, 75–101.
71. Upham, P., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Purdam, K., Darnton, A., McLachlan, C., & Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Public attitudes to environmental change: A selective review of theory and practice. A research synthesis for the living with environmental change programme. Research Councils UK. Retrieved from http://www.lwec.org.uk/
72. Whitmarsh, L. (2009). What's in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 401–420. doi: 10.1177/0963662506073088
73. Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
74. Wiener, J. B. (1997). Risk in the republic. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 8, 1–21.
75. Wilson, E. (2006). Adapting to climate change at the local level: The spatial planning response. Local Environment, 11(6), 609–625. doi: 10.1080/13549830600853635
76. Winzer, C. (2011). Conceptualizing energy security (EPRG Working Paper 1123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Wynne, B. (1992). Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111–127
78. Zehr, S. C. (2000). Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 85–103. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301