The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Process Analysis: The case of smoking control in Japan

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 28-44

  Sato, Hajime ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL POLICY;

JAPAN;

EID: 0032816107     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01951.x     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Aberbach, J. D., Putnam, R. D., & Rockman, B. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in Western democracies. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1966). Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
3. Altman, J. A., & Petkus, E. (1994). Toward a stakeholder-based policy process: An application of the social marketing perspective to environmental policy development. Policy Sciences, 27, 37-51.
4. Anderson, C. W. (1978). The logic of public problems: Evaluation in comparative policy research. In D. E. Ashford (Ed.), Comparing public policies: New concepts and methods (pp. 19-41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Anderson, J. (1979). Public policy making. New York, NY: Praeger.
6. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning. New York, NY: Wiley.
7. Axelrod, R. (1973). Bureaucratic decision making in the military assistance program. In M. Halperin & A. Kanter (Eds.), Readings in American foreign policy (pp. 211-270). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
8. Bagott, R. (1989). Regulatory reform in Britain: The changing face of self-regulation. Public Administration, 67, 435-454.
9. Bauer, R. A., Pool, I. S., & Dexter, L. A. (1963). American business and public policy: The politics of foreign trade. New York, NY: Atherton.
10. Braithwaite, J., & Fisse, B. (1987). Self regulation and the costs of corporate crime. In C. D. Shearing & P. C. Stenning (Eds.), Private policing (pp. 221-246). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Campbell, J. C. (1992). How policies change: The Japanese government and the aging society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Cerexbe, P. (1988). Advertising self regulation: The clayton's codes. Consuming Interests, 38, 16-20.
13. Cobb, R., Ross, J., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda-building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70, 126-138.
14. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
15. Connolly, W. (1984). Legitimacy and the state. New York, NY: New York University Press.
16. Crenson, M. A. (1971). The unpolitics of air pollution. Baltimore, MD: Johns-Hopkins University Press.
17. Doggan, M. (1975). The mandarins of western Europe. New York, NY: Wiley.
18. Doig, J. W., & Hargrove, E. C. (1990). Leadership and innovation: Entrepreneurs in government (abridged ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. Dunleavy, P. (1981). The politics of mass housing in Britain: 1945-75. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Dye, T.R. (1981). Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
21. Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago, IL: Markham.
22. Elder, C. E., & Cobb, R. W. (1983). The political uses of symbols. New York, NY: Longman.
23. Farrar, E., DeSanctis, J. E., & Cohen, D. K. (1980, November). The lawn party: The evolution of federal programs in local settings. Phi Delta Kappa, 62 (3), 167-171.
24. Freedman, J. O. (1978). Crisis and legitimacy: The administrative process and American government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Fritschler, A. L. (1989). Smoking and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Hall, P. M. (1973). A symbolic interactionist analysis of policies. In A. Effrat (Ed.), Perspectives in political sociology (pp. 35-75). New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
27. Hayes, L. D. (1994). Introduction to Japanese politics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marlowe.
28. Heap, S. H. (1989). Rationality in economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
29. Heclo, H. (1974). Social policy in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
31. Heintz, T. (1988). Advocacy coalitions and the OCS leasing debate: A case study in policy evolution. Policy Sciences, 21, 213-238.
32. Inoguchi, T. (1983). Gendai nihon seiji keizai no kozu. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimpo Sha.
33. Japan Women's Christian Temperance Union. (1980). Kin-en undo no rekishi. Tokyo: Japan Christian Women's Temperance Union.
34. Japan Public Monopoly Corporation. (1964a). Tabako senbaishi, (vol. 2). Tokyo: JPMC.
35. Japan Public Monopoly Corporation. (1964b). Tabako senbaishi, (vol. 3). Tokyo: JPMC.
36. Jenkins-Smith, H. (1990). Democratic politics and policy analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. Jenkins-Smith, H. (1991, June). Alternative theories of the policy process: Reflections on research strategy for the study of nuclear waste policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 157-166.
38. Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. (1993). The dynamics of policy-oriented learning. In P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 149-176). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1994). Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14, 175-203.
40. Johnson, C. (1975). Japan: Who governs? An essay on official bureaucracy. Journal of Japanese Studies, 2, 1-28.
41. Jones, C. O. (1975). Clean air. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
42. Jones, C. O. (1978). An introduction to the study of public policy (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury.
43. Jordan, A. G., & Richardson, J. J. (1983). Policy communities: British and European style. Policy Studies Journal, 11, 603-615.
44. Kawanaka, N. (1974). Nihon ni okeru seisaku kettei no seiji katei. In K. Tanimura (Ed.), Gendai gyosei to kanryo sei (pp. 3-46). Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppan Kai.
45. Kawasaki, T. (1993). Policy ideas and change in Japanese bureaucratic politics: The ministry of finance in international monetary crisis, 1969-1971. Journal of Public Policy, 13, 111-133.
46. King, O. J., & Roberts, N. C. R. (1987). Policy entrepreneurs: Catalysts for policy innovation. Journal of State Government, 60, 172-179.
47. Kingdon, J. W. (1973). Congressmen's voting decisions. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
48. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
49. Lasswell, H. (1954). Key symbols, signs and icons. In L. Bryson & L. Finkelstein (Eds.), Symbols and values: An initial study (pp. 199-204). New York, NY: The Free Press.
50. Levine, A. G. (1982). Love Canal: Science, politics and people. Lexington, MA: Heath.
51. Light, P. C. (1982). The president's agenda. Baltimore, MD: John-Hopkins University Press.
52. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 14, 79-88.
53. Lindblom, C. E. (1980). The policy making process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54. Lindblom, C. E., & Woodhouse, E. J. (1993). The policy-making process (3rd ed.). Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56. Milward, H. B., & Wamsley, G. (1984). Policy subsystems, networks, and the tools of public management. In R. Eyestone (Ed.), Public policy formation and implementation (pp. 123-154). New York, NY: JAI Press.
57. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (1993). Kitsuen to kenko. Tokyo: Kenko Tairyokuzukuri Jigyo Zaidan.
58. Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 420-434.
59. Moe, T. (1990). Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 6, 213-253.
60. Muramatsu, M., & Krauss, E. S. (1983). Bureaucratic politics and politicians in policymaking: The case of Japan. American Political Science Review, 78 (1), 126-146.
61. Nagai, Y. (1960). Atsuryoku seiji no nihon-teki kozo. In Nihon Seiji Gakkai (Ed.), Nihon no atsuryoku dantai (pp. 18-19). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
62. Nakamura, R. (1987). The textbook policy process and implementation research. Policy Studies Review, 1, 142-154.
63. Nakata, Y., & Watanabe B. (1980). Ken-en no jidai. Tokyo: Nami Shobo.
64. Nelson, B. (1984). Making an issue of child abuse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
66. Pempel, T. J. (1982). Policy and politics in Japan: Creative conservatism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
67. Peters, B. G. (1993). American public policy: Promise and performance. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
68. Pharr, S. J., & Krauss, E. S. (1996). Media and politics in Japan. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
69. Portney, K. E. (1986). Approaching public policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
70. Reich, M. R. (1991). Toxic politics: Responding to chemical disasters. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall. London: Unwin and Hyman.
72. Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
73. Rogers, H. R., & Bullock, C. S. (1972). Law and social change. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
74. Sabatier, P. (1978). The acquisition and utilization of technical information by administrative agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 369-417.
75. Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up models of policy implementation: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 21-48.
76. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129-168.
77. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
78. Sato, S. (1984, November). Jiminto choki seiken no kaibo. Chuo Koron, 99 (11), 66-100.
79. Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28, 243-270.
80. Scholz, J., Twombly, J., & Headrick, B. (1991). Street-level political controls over federal bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 829-850.
81. Sharpe, L. J. (1984). Intergovernmental policy-making: The limits of subnational autonomy. In F. Kaufman, V. Ostrom, & G. Majone (Eds.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector (pp. 159-182). Berlin: de Gruyter.
82. Smith, J. A. (1991). The idea brokers: Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elites. New York,NY: The Free Press.
83. Snare, C. E. (1995/1996). Windows of opportunity: When and how can the policy analyst influence the policymaker during the policy process. Policy Studies Review, 14, 407-430.
84. Starling, G. (1988). Strategies for policy making. Chicago, IL: Dorsey.
85. Stockwin, J. A. A. (1982). Japan: Divided politics in a growth economy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
86. Thompson, F. J. (1981). Health policy and the bureaucracy: Politics and implementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. Thompson, F. J. (1984). Implementation of health policy: Politics and bureaucracy. In T. J. Litman & L. S. Robins (Eds.), Health politics and policy (pp. 145-168). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
88. Van Meter, D. S., & Vailtorn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process. Administration and Society, 6, 447-462.
89. Walker, J. W. (1981). The diffusion of knowledge, policy communities, and agenda setting: The relationship of knowledge and power. In J. Tropman, M. Dluhy, & R. Lind (Eds.), New strategic perspectives on social policy (pp. 75-96). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
90. Weiss, C. H. (1970). The politicization of evaluation research. Journal of Social Issues, 26, 57-68.
91. Weiss, J. A. (1989). The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22, 97-121.