Clarifying, Operationalising, and Evaluating Supported Decision Making Models

Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 46-50

  Carney, Terry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920569987     PISSN: 23297018     EISSN: 23297026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2014.902727     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. ACT Disability, Aged and Carer Advocacy Service. (2013). Spectrums of support: A report on a project exploring supported decision making for people with disabilities in the ACT. Canberra: ACT Disability, Aged and Carer Advocacy Service.
2. Boundy, M., & Fleischner, B., (2013). Supported decision making instead of guardianship: An international overview. Washington: TASC [Training & Advocacy Support Center], National Disability Rights Network.
3. Brayley, J., (2012, October). The future of supported and substitute decision making. Paper presented at the World Congress of Adult Guardianship, Melbourne, Victoria.
4. Browning, M., (2010). Report by Michelle Browning, 2010 Churchill Fellow, to investigate new models of guardianship and the emerging practice of supported decision making. Canberra: Winston Churchill Memorial Trust Australia.
5. Browning, M., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J., (2014). Supported decision making: Understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice. Research & Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 1(1). doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.902726.
6. Carney, T., (2012). Participation and service access rights for people with intellectual disability: A role for law? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38(1), 59–69.
7. Carney, T., & Beaupert, F., (2013). Public and private Bricolage-Challenges balancing law, services & civil society in advancing CRPD supported decision making. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36(1), 175–201.
8. Fyson, R., & Cromby, J., (2013). Human rights and intellectual disabilities in an era of “choice”. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(12), 1164–1172.
9. Johns, A. F., (2012). Person-centered planning in guardianship: A little hope for the future. Utah Law Review, 2012(3), 1541–1573.
10. Kohn, N. A., & Blumenthal, J. A., (2014). A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7(1), S40–S43.
11. Kohn, N. A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Campbell, A. T., (2013). Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Review, 117(4), 1111–1157.
12. Mason, S. A., (2013). Foreword. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36(1), 170–174.
13. Power, A., Lord, J., & deFranco, A., (2013). Active citizenship and disability: Implementing the personalisation of support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Then, S.-N., (2013). Evolution and innovation in guardianship laws: Assisted decision-making. Sydney Law Review, 35(1), 133–166.
15. United Nations Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2006). Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml on 8 May 2014.
16. VLRC. (2012). Guardianship: Final report. Melbourne: Victorian Law Reform Commission.
17. Wallace, M., (2012). Evaluation of the supported decision making project. Adelaide: Office of the Public Advocate, SA.