Safety and Self-Sufficiency: Rhetoric and reality in the lives of welfare recipients

The Promise of Welfare Reform: Political Rhetoric and the Reality of Poverty in the Twenty-First Century

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 183-192

  Brush, Lisa D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920567440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203820254     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Bachman, R. & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
2. Bell, H. (2003). Cycles within cycles: Domestic violence, welfare, and low-wage work. Violence Against Women 9: 1245-1262.
3. Brandwein, R. (1999). Family violence, women, and welfare. In R. Brandwein (ed.), Battered women, children, and welfare reform: The ties that bind (pp. 3-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Browne, A., Salomon, A., & Bassuk, S. S. (1999). The impact of recent partner violence on poor women’s capacity to maintain work. Violence Against Women 5: 393-426.
5. Brush, L. D. (2002). Work-related abuse: A replication, new items, and persistent questions. Violence and Victims 17: 743-757.
6. Brush, L. D. (2003a). Impacts of welfare reform. Race, Gender and Class 10: 137-192.
7. Brush, L. D. (2003b). “That’s why I’m on Prozac”: Battered women, traumatic stress, and education in the context of welfare reform. In V. Adair&S. Dahlberg (eds.), Reclaiming class: Women, welfare, and the promise of higher education in America (pp. 215-239). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
8. Brush, L. D. (2004). Battering and the poverty trap. Journal of Poverty 8: 23-43.
9. Davis, M. (1999). The economics of abuse: How violence perpetuates women’s poverty. In R. Brandwein (ed.), Battered women, children, and welfare reform: The ties that bind (pp. 17-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Fox, J. A. & Zawitz, M. W. (2001). Homicide trends in the United States: Intimate homicide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11. Fraser, N. & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency—Tracing a keyword of the United States welfare-state. SIGNS 19: 309-336.
12. Hardesty, J. L. (2002). Separation assault in the context of postdivorce parenting—An integrative review of the literature. Violence Against Women 8: 597-625.
13. Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Hobson, B. (1990). No exit, no voice: Women’s economic dependency and the welfare state. Acta Sociologica 33: 235-250.
16. Howard, J. & Hollander, J. (2000). Gendered situations, gendered selves. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
17. Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence:Asubstantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women 8: 1332-1363.
18. Kingfisher, C. P. (1996). Women in the American welfare trap. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
19. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Lloyd, S., & Taluc, N. (1999). The effects of male violence on female employment. Violence Against Women 5: 370-392.
21. Meisel, J., Chandler, D. & Rienzi, B. M. (2003). Domestic violence prevalence and effects of employment on two California TANF populations. Violence Against Women 9: 1191-1212.
22. Misra, J., Moller, S., & Karides, M. (2003). Envisioning dependency: Media depictions of welfare in the 20th century. Social Problems 50: 482-504.
23. Monson, R. (1997). State-ing sex and gender: Collecting information from mothers and fathers in paternity cases. Gender & Society 11: 279-295.
24. Purvin, D. M. (2003). Weaving a tangled safety net: The intergenerational legacy of domestic violence and poverty. Violence Against Women 9: 1263-1277.
25. Raphael, J. (1999). Keeping women poor: How domestic violence prevents women from leaving welfare and entering the world of work. In R. Brandwein (ed.), Battered women, children, and welfare reform: The ties that bind (pp. 31-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Raphael, J. (2000). Saving Bernice: Battered women, welfare, and poverty. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
27. Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered black women. New York: Routledge.
28. Riger, S. & Staggs, S. L. (2004). Welfare reform, domestic violence, and employment: What do we know and what do we need to know? Violence Against Women 10: 961-990.
29. Scott, E. K., London, A. S., & Myers, N. A. (2002). Dangerous dependencies: The intersection of welfare reform and domestic violence. Gender&Society 16: 878-897.
30. Sev’er, A. (2002). Fleeing the house of horrors: Women who have left abusive partners. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
31. Tolman, R. M., Danziger, S. K., & Rosen, D. (2002). Domestic violence and economic well-being of current and former welfare recipients. Joint Center for Poverty Research Working Paper 304.
32. United States Congress. (1994). Violence Against Women Act. Title IV of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. P.L. 103-322.
33. United States Congress. (2000). Violence Against Women Act of 2000. P.L. 106-386.