Evolution of the performance measurement system in the Logistics Department of a broadcasting company: An action research

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 160, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-12

  Gutierrez, Debora M ^a   Scavarda, Luiz F ^a   Fiorencio, Luiza ^a   Martins, Roberto A ^b  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Action research; Broadcasting company; Empirical study; Life cycle; Logistics; Longitudinal study; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; ARTIFICIAL LIFE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE; LOGISTICS; MANAGERS;

ACTION RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; LOGISTICS DEPARTMENT; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; ORGANISATIONAL CAPABILITIES; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY;

BROADCASTING;

EID: 84920507912     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Beamon, B., 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 55 (3), 281-294.
2. Bititci, U., Garengo, P., Dörfler, V., Nudurupati, S., 2012. Performance measurement: challenges for tomorrow. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 14 (3), 305-327.
3. Bititci, U., Mendibil, K., Nudurupati, S., Turner, T., Garengo, P., 2004. The interplay between performance measurement, organizational culture and management styles. Meas. Bus. Excel. 8 (3), 28-41.
4. Bititci, U., Nudurupati, S., 2002. Driving continuous improvement. Manuf. Eng. 81 (5), 230-235.
5. Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., 2000. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 20 (7), 754-771.
6. Bourne, M., Neely, A., Platts, K., Mills, J., 2002. The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: perceptions of participating managers. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22 (11), 1288-1310.
7. Braz, R.G.F., Scavarda, L.F., Martins, R.A., 2011. Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: an action research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 133 (2), 751-760.
8. Bryman, A., 1989. Research Methods and Organization Studies. Unwin Hyman, London.
9. Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D., 2002. Action research for operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22 (2), 220-240.
10. Davies, G.B., 1982. Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Syst. J. 21 (1), 4-30.
11. De Toni, A., Tonchia, S., 2001. Performance measurement systems - models, characteristics and measures. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21 (1-2), 46-71.
12. De Waal, A., Counet, H., 2009. Lessons learned from performance management system implementations. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 58 (4), 367-390.
13. Eccles, R.G., 1991. The performance measurement manifesto. Harv. Bus. Rev. 69 (1), 131-137.
14. Folan, P., Browne, J., 2005. A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Comput. Ind. 56 (7), 663-680.
15. Fortuin, L., 1988. Performance indicators: why, where and how? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 34 (1), 1-9.
16. Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., Bourne, M., 2012. Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Manag. Acc. Res. 23 (2), 79-119.
17. Garengo, P., Nudurupati, S., Bititci, U., 2007. Understanding the relationship between PMS and MIS in SMEs: an organizational life cycle perspective. Comput. Ind. 58 (7), 677-686.
18. Globerson, S., 1985. Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization. Int. J. Prod. Res. 23 (4), 639-646.
19. Goold, M., Quinn, J.J., 1990. The paradox of strategic controls. Strateg. Manag. J. 11 (1), 43-57.
20. Gosselin, M., 2005. An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 54 (5/6), 419-437.
21. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., Mcgaughey, R.E., 2004. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87 (3), 333-347.
22. Healy, M., Perry, C., 2000. Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm, Qualitative Market Research. An International Journal 3 (3), 118-126.
23. Henri, J.-F., 2010. The periodic review of performance indicators: an empirical investigation of the dynamism of performance measurement systems. Eur. Acc. Rev. 19 (1), 73-96.
24. Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F., 1998. Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. J. Manag. Acc. Res. 10, 205-238.
25. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1993. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 71 (5), 134-147.
26. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard - Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press, Boston (322 pp.).
27. Kennerly, M., Neely, A., 2002. A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22 (11), 213-229.
28. Kennerly, M., Neely, A., 2003. Measuring performance in changing business environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 23 (2), 1222-1245.
29. Korhonen, T., Laine, T., Suomala, P., 2013. Understanding performance measurement dynamism: a case study. J. Manag. Gov. 17 (1), 35-58.
30. Lima, E.P., Costa, S.E.G., Angelis, J.J., Munik, J., 2013. Performance measurement systems: a consensual analysis of their roles. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146 (2), 524-542.
31. Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., Wouters, M., 2004. Designing a performance measurement system design: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156 (2), 267-286.
32. Najmi, M., Etebari, M., Emami, S., 2012. A framework to review Performance Prism. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 32 (10), 1124-1146.
33. Neely, A., 1998. Measuring Business Performance. The Economist and Profile Books, London (224 pp.).
34. Neely, A., 1999. The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 19 (2), 205-228.
35. Neely, A.D., Al-Najjar, M., 2006. Moving from measurement to insight: the true role of performance measurement. Calif. Manag. Rev. 48 (3), 101-114.
36. Neely, A.D., Bourne, M., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., 2002. Getting the Measure of Your Business. Cambrigde University Press, U.K. (143 pp.).
37. Neely, A., Gregory, M., Platts, K., 2005. Performance measurement system design - a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25 (12), 1228-1263.
38. Neely, A., Mills, J., Gregory, M., Platts, K., 1995. Performance measurement system design - a literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 15 (4), 80-116.
39. Neely, A.D., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M., Richards, H., 1996. Performance measurement system design: should process based approaches be adopted? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 46-47, 423-431.
40. Neely, A.D., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., Bourne, M., 1997. Designing performance measures: a structured approach. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 17 (11), 1131-1152.
41. Nudurupati, S.S., 2003. Management and Business Implications of IT-supported Performance Measurement (Ph.D. thesis). University of Strathclyde, UK.
42. Nudurupati, S.S., Bititci, U.S., Kumar, V., Chan, F.T.S., 2011. State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60 (2), 279-290.
43. Platts, K.W., Gregory, M.J., 1990. Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 10 (9), 5-26.
44. Platts, K.W., 1993. A process approach to researching manufacturing strategy. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 13 (8), 4-17.
45. Platts, K.W., 1994. Characteristics of methodologies for manufacturing strategy formulation. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 7 (2), 93-99.
46. Rompho, N., Boon-Itt, S., 2012. Measuring the success of a performance measurement system in Thai firms. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 61 (5), 548-562.
47. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T., 2002. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
48. Schmidberger, S., Bals, L., Hartmann, E., Jahns, C., 2009. Ground handling services at European hub airports: development of a performance measurement system for benchmarking. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 117 (1), 104-116.
49. Sink, D.S., 1985. Productivity Management: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
50. Sink, D.S., 1991. The role of measurement in achieving world class quality and productivity management. Ind. Eng. 21 (6), 23-28.
51. Taylor, A., Taylor, M., 2013. Antecedents of effective performance measurement system implementation: an empirical study of UK manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 (18), 5485-5498.
52. Thompson, F.C., 2004. Generalising results of an action research project in one work place to other situations: Principles and practice. European Journal of Marketing 38 (3/4), 401-417.
53. van Helden, G.J., Johnsen, A˚., Vakkuri, J., 2012. The life-cycle approach to performance management: implications for public management and evaluation. Evaluation 18 (2), 159-175.
54. Westbrook, R., 1995. Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 15 (12), 6-20.
55. Wisner, J.D., Fawcett, S.E., 1991. Link firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurement. Prod. Inventory Manag. J. 32 (3), 5-11.
56. Wouters, M., Sportel, M., 2005. The role of existing measures in developing and implementing performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25 (11), 1062-1082.
57. Wouters, M., Wilderom, C., 2008. Developing performance measurement systems as enabling formalization: a longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Acc. Organ. Soc. 33 (4-5), 488-516.