Hybrid revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1277-1283

  Gasior, Mariusz ^a   Zembala, Michael Oscar ^a   Tajstra, Mateusz ^a   Filipiak, Krzysztof ^a   Gierlotka, Marek ^a   Hrapkowicz, Tomasz ^a   Hawranek, Micha ^a   Polonski, Lech ^a   Zembala, Marian ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

Author keywords

CABG; Hybrid revascularization; Multivessel coronary artery disease; PCI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DEATH; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYBRID CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVESSEL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY STENOSIS; HEMORRHAGE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MORTALITY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PILOT STUDY; POLAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POLAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84920507563     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2010;31:2501-55.
2. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60: e44-164.
3. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.
4. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-years results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialist Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344: 563-70.
5. Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, et al. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107:657-62.
6. Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294: 2446-54.
7. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;291:1841-9.
8. Balacumaraswami LM, Taggart DP. Intraoperative imaging techniques to assess coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2251-7.
9. Mauri L, Orav EJ, Kuntz RE. Late loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparison. Circulation 2005;111: 3435-42.
10. Zembala M, Tajstra M, Zembala MO, et al. Prospective randomised pilOt study evaLuating the safety and efficacy of hybrid revascularisation in MultI-vessel coronary artery DisEaSe (POLMIDES): study design. Kardiol Pol 2011;69:460-6.
11. Holzhey DM, Cornely JP, Rastan AJ, Davierwala P, Mohr FW. Review of a 13-year single-center experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass as the primary surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Heart Surg Forum 2012;15:E61-8.
12. Hu S, Li Q, Gao P, et al. Simultaneous hybrid revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:432-9.
13. Zhao DX, Leacche M, Balaguer JM, et al. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization: results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53: 232-41.
14. Leacche M, Byrne JG, Solenkova NS, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery versus hybrid coronary revascularization stratified by SYNTAX and EuroSCORE. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145: 1004-12.
15. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360: 961-72.
16. Reicher B, Poston RS, Mehra MR, et al. Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes. Am Heart J 2008;155:661-7.