Innovation determinants over industry life cycle

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 91, Issue , 2015, Pages 18-32

  Tavassoli, Sam ^a  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Community innovation survey (CIS4); Determinants of innovation; Industry life cycle (ILC); Innovation intensity; Innovation propensity

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEYS; INDUSTRY CONTEXTS; INDUSTRY LIFE CYCLES; INNOVATION INTENSITY; INNOVATION PROPENSITIES; INTERNAL RESOURCES; LEVEL MODEL; MICRO LEVEL;

LIFE CYCLE;

INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84920168018     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Utterback J.M., Abernathy W.J. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 1975, 3(6):639.
2. Agarwal R., Gort M. The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1996, 78(3):489.
3. Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Am. Econ. Rev. 1996, 86(3):562.
4. Klepper S. Industry life cycles. Ind. Corp. Chang. 1997, 6:145.
5. Acs Z., Audretsch D. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1987, 69(4):567.
6. Dosi G., Nelson R.R. An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. J. Evol. Econ. 1994, 4:153.
7. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Ind. Corp. Chang. 1997, 6(1):83.
8. Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
9. Malerba F. Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005, 380. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Bartel A.P., Lichtenberg F.R. The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1987, 69:1.
11. Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990, 35(1):128.
12. Crepon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. Research investment, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis. Econ. Innov. N. Technol. 1998, 7(2):115.
13. Hall B.H., Mairesse J. Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Econ. Innov. N. Technol. 2006, 15(4/5):289.
14. Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 1966, 2:190.
15. Hirsch S. Location of Industry and International Competitiveness 1967, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Karlsson C., Nyström K. Exit and entry over the product life cycle: evidence from the Swedish manufacturing industry. Small Bus. Econ. 2003, 21:135.
17. Neffke F., Svensson Henning M., Boschma R., Lundquist K., Olander L. The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries. Regional Studies 2011, 45(1):49.
18. Potter A., Watts H.D. Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle. J. Econ. Geogr. 2011, 11(3):417.
19. Mohnen P., Mairesse J., Dagenais M. Innovativity; a comparison across seven European countries. Econ. Innov. N. Technol. 2006, 15(4/5):391.
20. Comanor W.S. Market structure, product differentiation and industrial research. Q. J. Econ. 1967, 81:639.
21. Scherer F.M. Size of firm, oligopoly and research: a comment. Can. J. Econ. Polit. Sci. 1965, 31:256.
22. Patel P., Pavitt K. Patterns of Technological Activity: Their Measurement and Interpretation in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change 1995, 14. Blackwell, Oxford.
23. Janz N., Lööf H., Peters B. Innovation and productivity in German and Swedish manufacturing firms: is there a common story?. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2004, 2:184.
24. Andersson M., Lööf H. Small business innovation: firm level evidence from Sweden. J. Technol. Transfer. 2011, 10.1007/s10961-011-9216-9.
25. Pavitt K., Wald S. The Conditions for Success in Technological Innovation 1971, OECD, Paris.
26. Cohen W.M., Klepper S. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1996, 78(2):232.
27. Fritsch M., Meschede M. Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2001, 19:335.
28. Keller W. International technology diffusion. J. Econ. Lit. 2004, 42(3):752.
29. Clerides S., Lach S., Tybout J. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Q. J. Econ. 1998, 113:903.
30. Castellani D. Export behaviour and productivity growth: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Rev. World Econ. 2002, 138(4):605.
31. Andersson M., Lööf H. Learning-by-exporting revisited: the role of intensity and persistence. Scand. J. Econ. 2009, 111(4):893.
32. Acharya R., Keller W. Technology Transfer through Imports. NBER Working Paper Series 13086 2007.
33. Lööf H. Technology Spillovers and Innovation - The Importance of Domestic and foreign sources in Determinants of Innovative Behavior 2008, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
34. Lööf H., Andersson M. Imports, productivity and origin markets: the role of knowledge-intensive economies. World Econ. 2010, 33(3):458.
35. Bathelt H., Malmberg A., Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2004, 28(1):31_56.
36. Bernard A.B., Wagner J. Exports and success in German manufacturing. Rev. World Econ. 1997, 133(1):134.
37. Bernard A.B., Jensen J.B. Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?. J. Int. Econ. 1999, 47(1):1.
38. Britton J.N.H. Network structure of an industrial cluster: electronics in Toronto. Environ. Plan. A 2003, 35:983.
39. Blundell R., Griffith R., Reenen J.V. Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1999, 66:529.
40. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell J. Econ. 1979, 10(1):92.
41. OECD Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data 2005, OECD and Eurostat, Paris.
42. Gort M., Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econ. J. 1982, 92:630.
43. Klepper S., Graddy E. The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure. RAND J. Econ. 1990, 21(1):27.
44. McGahan A.M., Silverman B.S. How does innovative activity change as industries mature?. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2001, 19:1141.
45. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P. Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev. Ind. Organ. 1996, 11:253.
46. Otto A., Fornahl D. Origins of human capital in clusters: regional, industrial and academic transitions in media clusters in Germany. Emerging Clusters: Theoretical, Empirical and Political Perspectives on the Initial Stage of Cluster Evolution 2010, 99. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
47. Kleinknecht A., Van Montfort K., Brouwer E. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2002, 11(2):109.
48. Smith K. Measuring Innovation, in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation 2005, 148-179. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Lööf H., Heshmati A. On the relationship between innovation and performance: a sensitivity analysis. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2006, 15(4/5):317.
50. Mairesse J., Mohnen P. Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2010, vol. II:1129-1155. Burlington Academic Press, London.
51. Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47:153.
52. Harvey D. The Limits to Capital 1982, Blackwell, Oxford, England.
53. Andersson M., Lööf H., Johansson S. Productivity and international trade: firm level evidence from a small open economy. Rev. World Econ. 2008, 144(4):774.
54. van Beers C., Berghäll E., Poot T. R&D internationalization, R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: evidence from Finland and the Netherlands. Res. Policy 2008, 37(2).
55. Johansson B., Lööf H. Innovation activities explained by firm attributes and location. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2008, 17(6):533.
56. Freeman C., Soete L. The Economics of Industrial Innovation 1997, Oxon, Routledge. 3rd edition.
57. Christensen C.M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
58. The Economist, "The Last Kodak Moment?," January 14 2012, ([Online]. Available: http://www.economist.com/node/21542796. [Accessed 25 September 2013].).
59. Melitz M.J. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 2003, 71(6):1695.
60. Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Industry Evolution 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
61. Pouder R., John C.S. Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1996, 21(4):1192.
62. Morrison A. Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts: who they are, how they interact. Reg. Stud. 2008, 42(6):817.
63. Kuznets S. Retardation in economic growth. J. Econ. Bus. Hist. 1929, 1:534.
64. Winter S.G. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regime. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1984, 5:287.
65. Acs Z., Audretsch D. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1988, 78(4):678.
66. Leiponen A., Drejer I. What exactly are technological regimes?: intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Res. Policy 2007, 36(8):1221.
67. Srholec M., Verspagen B. The voyage of the Beagle into innovation: explorations on heterogeneity, selection, and sectors. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2012, 21(5):1221.