How to dance? The tango of stakeholder involvement in marine governance research

Marine Policy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2014, Pages 347-352

  Kraan, Marloes ^a   Hendriksen, Astrid ^a   van Hoof, Luc ^a   van Leeuwen, Judith ^a   Jouanneau, Charlène ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Joint knowledge production; Marine governance research; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE POLICY; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 84907596029     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Gray T, Hatchard J. A complicated relationship: stakeholder participation and the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management. Mar Policy 2008, 32:158-168.
2. Gray T., Hatchard J. The 2002 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy's system of governance-rhetoric or reality?. Mar Policy 2003, 27:545-554.
3. Hendriksen A, Tukahirwa JT, Oosterveer PJM, Mol APJ. Participatory decision-making for sanitation improvements in unplanned urban settlements in East Africa. J Environ Dev 2012, 21(1):98-119.
4. Dunn E. The role of environmental NGOs in fisheries governance. Participation in fisheries governance (reviews: methods and technologies in fish biology and fisheries 2005, 4:209-218. (In:).
5. Bulkeley H, Mol APJ. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ Values 2003, 12:143-154.
6. Beierle TC. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Anal 2002, 22:739-749.
7. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan Assoc 1969, 35:216-224.
8. Reed MS. Stakeholder participation for environmental management. A literature review. Biol Conserv 2008, 141:1417-1431.
9. Jonsson A, Andersson L, Alkan-Olsson JB, Arnheimer B. How participatory can participatory modeling be? Degrees of influence of stakeholder and expert perspectives in six dimensions of participatory modeling. Water Sci Technol 2007, 56(1):207-214.
10. Raakjær J, Vedsmand T Fisheries Co-Management: an alternative strategy in fisheries-cases from Denmark. Reinventing the Commons, In: Proceedings of the fifth annual conference of the international association for the study of common property. Bodoe, Norway, May 24-28, 1995.
11. Raakjær J, Vedsmand T. User participation and institutional change in fisheries management: a viable alternative to the failures of 'top-down' driven control?. Ocean Coast Manag 1999, 42:19-37.
12. Fish for life: interactive governance for fisheries 2005, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam. J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.).
13. Fung A, Wright E. Deepening democracy: innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics Soc 2001, 29(1):5-41.
14. Commission of the European Communities, Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), 2008.
15. Reed MS, Fraser EDG, Morse S, Dougill AJ. Integrating methods for developing sustainability indicators that can facilitate learning and action. Ecol Soc 2005, 10:1.
16. Fortuin KPJ, Bush SR. Educating students to cross boundaries between disciplines and cultures and between theory and practice. Int J Sustain Higher Educ 2010, 11(1):19-35.
17. Huitema D, Turnhout E. Working at the science-policy interface: a discursive analysis of boundary work at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Environ Polit 2009, 18:576-594.
18. Bryman A Social research methods 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
19. Van Leeuwen J, Van Hoof L, Van Tatenhove J. Institutional ambiguity in implementing the European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):636-643.
20. Ounanian K, Delaney A, Raakjær J, Ramirez-Monsalve P. On unequal footing: 'stakeholders' perspectives on the Marine Strategy Framework Directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management. Mar Policy 2012, 36(3):658-666.
21. Van Leeuwen J., Raakjær J., Van Hoof L., Van Tatenhove J., Long R., Ounanian K. Implementing the Marine Strategy Framework Directive: a policy perspective on regulatory, institutional and stakeholder impediments to effective implementation. Mar Policy 2014, 50:325-330.
22. Verweij MC, Van Densen WLT, Mol APJ. The tower of Babel: different perceptions and controversies on change and status of North Sea fish stocks in multi-stakeholder settings. Mar Policy 2010, 34(3):522-533.
23. Van Hoof L., Hendriksen A., Bloomfield HJ. Sometimes you can't make it on your own: drivers and scenarios for regional cooperation in implementing the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 2014, 50:339-346.
24. Hendriksen A., Jouanneau C., Koss R., Raakjær J. Fishing for opinions: stakeholder views on MSFD implementation in European Seas. Mar Policy 2014, 50:353-363.
25. Van Tatenhove J., Raakjær J., Van Leeuwen J., Van Hoof L. Regional cooperation for European seas: governance models in support of the implementation of the MSFD. Mar. Policy 2014, 50:364-372.
26. Hordijk M, Baud I. The role of research and knowledge generation in collective action and urban governance: how can researchers act as catalysts?. Habitat Int 2006, 30:668-689.