Geometric Information for Event Segmentation

Understanding Events: From Perception to Action

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Shipley, Thomas F ^a   Maguire, Mandy J ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Event perception; Meaning; Object motion; Perceptual processes; Social graces

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920117112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0018     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72, 708-717.
2. Braine, M. D. S. (1990). The "natural logic" approach to reasoning. In W. F. Overton (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives (pp. 133-157). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Braine, M. D. S., Reiser, B. J., & Rumain, B. (1984). Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional logic. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 18. Advances in research and theory (pp. 313-371). New York: Academic Press.
4. Brunswik, E., & Kamiya, J. (1953). Ecological cue-validity of "proximity" and of other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 20-32.
5. Clark, E. V. (2001). Emergent categories in first language acquisition. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 379-405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Engel, S. A., & Rubin, J. M. (1986). Detecting visual motion boundaries. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Motion: Representation and Analysis (pp. 107-111). Washington, DC:IEEE Computer Society.
7. Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
8. Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
10. Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
11. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical perspectives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12. Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal continuity and perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13, 287-305.
13. Mandler, J. M. (2006). Actions organize the infant's world. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 111-133). New York:Oxford University Press.
14. Mann, R., & Jepson, A. (2002). Detection and classification of motion boundaries. Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 764-769).
15. Mann, R., Jepson, A., & Siskind, J. M. (1997). The computational perception of scene dyntamics. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65(2), 113-128.
16. Markman, E. M. (1991). The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 72-106). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Marr, D., & Vaina, L. (1982). Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 214, 501-524.
18. Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
19. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
20. Quine, W. V. (1996). Events and reification. In R. Castati & A. C. Varzi (Eds.), Events (pp. 107-116). Aldershot, England: Dartmouth. Reprinted from E. LePore & B. P. McLaughlin (Eds.) (1985), Actions and events: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 162-171). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
21. Rubin, J. M., & Richards, W. A. (1985). Boundaries of visual motion. Artificial Intelligence Memo, 835.
22. Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
23. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (2003). Boundary completion in illusory contours:Interpolation or extrapolation? Perception, 32(8), 985-1000.
24. Shipley, T. F., Maguire, M. J., & Brumberg, J. (2004). Segmentation of event paths. Journal of Vision, 4(8), 562.
25. Singh, M., & Hoffman, D. D. (2001) Parts-based representations of visual shape and implications for visual cognition. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 401-459). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
26. Singh, M., Seyranian, G., & Hoffman, D. (1999). Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 636-660.
27. Siskind, J. M. (2001). Grounding the lexical semantics of verbs in visual perception using force dynamics and event logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15, 31-90.
28. Slobin, D. I. (2001). Form-function relations: How do children find out what they are? In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 406-449). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 157-192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Talmy, L. (2000) Towards a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Yin, C., Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (2000). Surface integration influences depth discrimination. Vision Research, 40, 1969-1978.
33. Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 979-1008.
34. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273-293.
35. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.