From model-based perceptual decision-making to spatial interference control

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages 72-77

  van Maanen, Leendert ^a   Turner, Brandon ^b   Forstmann, Birte U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ANTERIOR INSULA; BOLD SIGNAL; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; NETHERLANDS; NEUROSCIENCE; NOISE; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REVIEW; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS;

EID: 84920093439     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23521546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.10.010     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Forstmann B.U., Wagenmakers E.-J., Eichele T., Brown S.D., Serences J.T. Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and cognitive models: opposites attract?. Trends Cogn Sci 2011, 6:272-279.
2. Model-based cognitive neuroscience: An introduction 2015, Springer, http://www.springer.com/biomed/neuroscience/book/978-1-4939-2235-2. B.U. Forstmann, E.J. Wagenmakers (Eds.).
3. Mulder M., Van Maanen L., Forstmann B.U. Perceptual decision neurosciences-a model-based review. Neuroscience 2014, 872-884.
4. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput 2008, 20:873-922. 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420.
5. Dambacher M., Hübner R. Time pressure affects the efficiency of perceptual processing in decisions under conflict. Psychol Res 2014, 10.1007/s00426-014-0542-z.
6. Hübner R., Steinhauser M., Lehle C. A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychol Rev 2010, 117:759-784. 10.1037/a0019471.
7. Servant M., Montagnini A., Burle B. Conflict tasks and the diffusion framework: insight in model constraints based on psychological laws. Cogn Psychol 2014, 72:162-195. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.03.002.
8. White C.N., Ratcliff R., Starns J.J. Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cogn Psychol 2011, 63:210-238. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001.
9. White C.N., Brown S., Ratcliff R. A test of Bayesian observer models of processing in the Eriksen flanker task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012, 38:489-497. 10.1037/a0026065.
10. Wiecki T.V., Frank M.J. A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia. Psychol Rev 2013, 120:329-355. 10.1037/a0031542.
11. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1990, 97:253-270.
12. Ridderinkhof K.R. Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action, Vol. XIX of Attention & Performance 2002, 494-519. Oxford UP.
13. Pratte M.S., Rouder J.N., Morey R.D., Feng C. Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010, 72:2013-2025. 10.3758/APP.72.7.2013.
14. Schwarz W., Miller J. Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychon Bull Rev 2012, 19:555-574. 10.3758/s13423-012-0254-6.
15. Domenech P., Dreher J.-C. Decision threshold modulation in the human brain. J Neurosci 2010, 30:14305-14317. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2371-10.2010.
16. Liu T., Pleskac T.J. Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. J Neurophysiol 2011, 106:2383-2398. 10.1152/jn.00413.2011.
17. Philiastides M.G., Sajda P. EEG-informed fMRI reveals spatiotemporal characteristics of perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 2007, 27:13082-13091. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3540-07.2007.
18. Ho T.C., Brown S., Serences J.T. Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex. J Neurosci 2009, 29:8675-8687. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5984-08.2009.
19. Rowe J.B., Hughes L., Nimmo-Smith I. Action selection: a race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas. Neuroimage 2010, 51:888-896. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.045.
20. White C.N., Congdon E., Mumford J.A., Karlsgodt K.H., Sabb F.W., Freimer N.B., London E.D., Cannon T.D., Bilder R.M., Poldrack R.A. Decomposing decision components in the stop-signal task: a model-based approach to individual differences in inhibitory control. J Cogn Neurosci 2014, 26:1601-1614.
21. Forstmann B.U., Dutilh G., Brown S., Neumann J., von Cramon D.Y., Ridderinkhof K.R., Wagenmakers E.-J. Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:17538-17542.
22. Mansfield E.L., Karayanidis F., Jamadar S., Heathcote A., Forstmann B.U. Adjustments of response threshold during task switching: a model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2011, 31:14688-14692. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2390-11.2011.
23. Mulder M., Wagenmakers E.-J., Ratcliff R., Boekel W., Forstmann B.U. Bias in the brain: a diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. J Neurosci 2012, 32:2335-2343. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4156-11.2012.
24. Van Maanen L., Brown S.D., Eichele T., Wagenmakers E.J., Ho T.C., Serences J.T., Forstmann B.U. Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. J Neurosci 2011, 31:17488-17495.
25. Winkel J., Van Maanen L., Ratcliff R., Van der Schaaf M., Van Schouwenburg M., Cools R., Forstmann B.U. Bromocriptine does not alter speed-accuracy tradeoff. Front Decis Neurosci 2012, 6. Article 126.
26. Bogacz R., Gurney K. The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Comput 2007, 19:442-477. 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442.
27. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
28. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: charted territory and new frontiers. Cogn Sci 2014, 38:1249-1285. 10.1111/cogs.12126.
29. Shenhav A., Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 2013, 79:217-240. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007.
30. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001, 108:624-652.
31. Carter C.S., van Veen V. Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007, 7:367-379.
32. Aarts E., Roelofs A., van Turennout M. Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood. J Neurosci 2008, 28:4671-4678. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4400-07.2008.
33. Sohn M.-H., Albert M.V., Jung K., Carter C.S., Anderson J.R. Anticipation of conflict monitoring in the anterior cingulate cortex and the prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:10330-10334. 10.1073/pnas.0703225104.
34. Strack G., Kaufmann C., Kehrer S., Brandt S., Stürmer B. Anticipatory regulation of action control in a Simon task: behavioral, electrophysiological, and fMRI correlates. Front Psychol 2013, 4:47. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00047.
35. Carter C.S., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Botvinick M.M., Noll D., Cohen J.D. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998, 280:747-749.
36. Brown J.W., Braver T.S. Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science 2005, 307:1118-1121. 10.1126/science.1105783.
37. Magno E., Foxe J.J., Molholm S., Robertson I.H., Garavan H. The anterior cingulate and error avoidance. J Neurosci 2006, 26:4769-4773. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0369-06.2006.
38. Johnston K., Levin H.M., Koval M.J., Everling S. Top-down control-signal dynamics in anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex neurons following task switching. Neuron 2007, 53:453-462. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.023.
39. Liston C., Matalon S., Hare T.A., Davidson M.C., Casey B.J. Anterior cingulate and posterior parietal cortices are sensitive to dissociable forms of conflict in a task-switching paradigm. Neuron 2006, 50:643-653. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.015.
40. Egner T., Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:1784-1790. 10.1038/nn1594.
41. Fan J., Kolster R., Ghajar J., Suh M., Knight R.T., Sarkar R., McCandliss B.D. Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2007, 27:2272-2282. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3470-06.2007.
42. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald 3rd A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026. 10.1126/science.1089910.
43. Kerns J.G. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an fMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage 2006, 33:399-405. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.012.
44. Nee D.E., Wager T.D., Jonides J. Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007, 7:1-17.
45. Forstmann B.U., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Ridderinkhof K.R. Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20:1854-1865. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20122.
46. Forstmann B.U., Jahfari S., Scholte H.S., Wolfensteller U., van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Ridderinkhof K.R. Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model-based approach. J Neurosci 2008, 28:9790-9796. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1465-08.2008.
47. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R.A. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci 2014, 18:177-185. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003.
48. Erika-Florence M., Leech R., Hampshire A. A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4073. 10.1038/ncomms5073.
49. Berkman E.T., Kahn L.E., Merchant J.S. Training-induced changes in inhibitory control network activity. J Neurosci 2014, 34:149-157. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-13.2014.
50. Fan J., Flombaum J.I., McCandliss B.D., Thomas K.M., Posner M.I. Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage 2003, 18:42-57.
51. Liu X., Banich M.T., Jacobson B.L., Tanabe J.L. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1097-1106. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.033.
52. Peterson B.S., Kane M.J., Alexander G.M., Lacadie C., Skudlarski P., Leung H.C., May J., Gore J.C. An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002, 13:427-440.
53. Bogacz R., Wagenmakers E.J., Forstmann B.U., Nieuwenhuis S. The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends Neurosci 2010, 33:10-16.
54. Egner T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007, 7:380-390.